Evaluation Requirements. 10.5.1 The Unit Member’s Evaluator shall be his/her Immediate Supervisor in the FCSS program.
Evaluation Requirements. A. Each completed evaluation will result in the assignment of a teacher effectiveness rating of Accomplished, Skilled, Developing, or Ineffective. The teacher effectiveness rating shall be derived from a summative evaluation where fifty percent (50%) of the overall evaluation is based on a teacher’s performance rating as provided in this Agreement, and fifty percent (50%) of the overall evaluation is based upon student growth measures as provided for in this Agreement.
Evaluation Requirements. The School Board, pursuant to its constitutional duty to supervise the public schools in the school division, will annually receive a presentation from the Charter School which will include the Charter School’s progress toward the academic measures stated herein and an updated budget. The School Board will also review and consider the audit referenced above.
Evaluation Requirements. 6.5.1 Formal observations shall last at least thirty (30) minutes; shall be made known to the Unit Member at least two (2) working days prior to their occurrence; shall be followed by a conference with written feedback within five (5) working days of the observation.
Evaluation Requirements a. The demonstration evaluation will meet the prevailing standards of scientific evaluation and academic rigor, as appropriate and feasible for each aspect of the evaluation, including standards for the evaluation design, conduct, and interpretation and reporting of findings.
Evaluation Requirements. The demonstration evaluation will meet the prevailing standards of scientific and academic rigor, as appropriate and feasible for each aspect of the evaluation, including standards for the evaluation design, conduct, and interpretation and reporting of findings. The demonstration evaluation will use the best available data; use controls and adjustments for and reporting of the limitations of data and their effects on results; and discuss the generalizability of results. The State shall acquire an independent entity to conduct the evaluation. The evaluation design shall discuss the State’s process for obtaining an independent entity to conduct the evaluation, including a description of the qualifications the entity must possess, how the State will assure no conflict of interest, and a budget for evaluation activities. Evaluation Design. The Evaluation Design shall include the following core components to be approved by CMS: Research questions and hypotheses: This includes a statement of the specific research questions and testable hypotheses that address the goals of the demonstration. At a minimum, the research questions shall address the goals of improving access, reducing churning, improving quality of care thereby leading to enhanced health outcomes, and lowering costs. The research questions will have appropriate comparison groups and may be studied in a time series. The analyses of these research questions will provide the basis for a robust assessment of cost effectiveness. The following are among the hypotheses to be considered in development of the evaluation design and will be included in the design as appropriate: The formation of new partnerships and collaborations within the delivery system The increased acceptance of TCOC risk-based payments among MassHealth providers Improvements in the member experience of care, particularly through increased member engagement in the primary care setting or closer coordination among providers Reductions in the growth of avoidable inpatient utilization Reductions in the growth of TCOC for MassHealth’s managed care-eligible population More robust EHR and other infrastructure capabilities and interconnectivity among providers Increased coordination across silos of care (e.g., physical health, behavioral health, LTSS, social supports) Maintenance or improvement of clinical quality The enhancement of safety net providers’ capacity to serve Medicaid and uninsured patients in the Commonwealth Increased coverage of ...
Evaluation Requirements. The County utilizes the Results Based Accountability (RBA) framework and Clear Impact performance software to track program performance. The Contractor is required to implement County RBA metrics listed below. Any changes that the Contractor wishes to make to the RBA document should be discussed with the County. Process Objectives “How Much” Performance Measure Data Collection Tool By June 30th, 2020, contractor maintained Excel Tracking Sheet (rolling outreach log) will contain a minimum of 120 clients, who were provided Street # clients tracked on Excel Tracking Sheet (rolling outreach log) who were provided Street Health Services in past 60 days Excel Tracking Sheet Health Services in the past 60 days. # of unique clients who were provided Street Health Services per month By June 30th, 2020, 150 clients will have active enrollment in a medical home. # of clients who have been enrolled in or reconnected to a medical home Excel Tracking Sheet By June 30th, 2020, 175 clients will receive an outreach assessment to determine basic needs. # of clients who receive an outreach assessment to determine basic needs Alameda County Outreach Assessment Tool Excel Tracking Sheet By June 30, 2020 the Street Health team (RN/NP/PA/MD) will screen 150 unique clients for blood borne pathogens (HIV and/or HCV) # of unique clients screened for blood borne pathogens (HIV and/or HCV) EHR or other Data Tracking Tool Quality Objective “How Well” Performance Measure Data Collection Tool By June 30th, 2020, Street Health Outreach Team will have attended 80% of learning community meetings/events/activities % of learning community meetings/events/activities attended by Street Health Outreach Team Scanned ACHCH Sign-in sheets (kept by ACHCH Administration) By June 30th, 2020, 90% of uninsured clients will have been provided assistance with completing and submitting an application to SSA for medical insurance or Health PAC. % (#) of clients with active medical insurance or Health PAC % (#) of uninsured clients provided assistance with completing and submitting an application for medical insurance or Health PAC Excel Tracking Sheet By June 30th, 2020, 80% of clients will have completed an intake at a housing resource center. % (#) of clients with completed assessment at housing resource center % (#) of clients linked to housing resource center who are document ready at time of Coordinated Entry assessment/intake Excel Tracking Sheet By June 30th, 2020, 75% of clients with positive scre...
Evaluation Requirements. There shall be filed with the Human Resources Department an annual evaluation for each permanent employee evaluating their performance in their particular position for the period covered in the written evaluation. Permanent employees shall be formally evaluated annually. At the discretion of the immediate supervisor, unit members with five (5) or more years with the District may be evaluated once every two (2) years if the last two (2) evaluations have been overall outstanding.
Evaluation Requirements. A. Each employee shall be evaluated in accordance with the criteria appropriate to the employee’s position.
Evaluation Requirements. The Subgrantee acknowledges that by accepting the Grant, it is expected to engage in activities related to the evaluation of the grant. These evaluation activities enable the Subgrantee and JFNA to determine grant impact, promising practices, and potential for replication. JFNA may waive or modify, in its absolute discretion, certain evaluation requirements for certain Subgrantees. Accordingly, the Subgrantee agrees to the following requirements:
