Evaluation Framework. The document created and approved by the ODE that establishes the Standards-Based evaluation of teachers in accordance with Ohio Rev. Code § 3319.111(A).
Evaluation Framework. Project approach
Evaluation Framework. Project approach This Framework will be implemented by all jurisdictions (including the Commonwealth), collectively drawing on the agreed evaluation questions and indicators as appropriate to the Parties to the agreement. Each Party agrees to provide qualitative and quantitative data (as appropriate to the Parties) to report on the relevant indicators by 1 October 2018, to enable data compilation and analysis and the drafting of a report to the COAG Health Council. The report is intended to inform future activities that will continue to build the evidence base for joint action on coordinated care. The Evaluation Framework is based on a pre/post design. For some indicators, baseline data will be able to be collected at the commencement of the activity (for example, routinely collected data), while for other indicators, the data collected at the 12 month point will form the baseline for comparison at the end point. All Parties will participate in the development of, and agree on, the report to the COAG Health Council which will outline the progress against each of the evaluation questions, based on compilation and analysis of the qualitative and quantitative data provided by individual jurisdictions. The Evaluation Framework includes: key evaluation questions; a number of agreed indicators, as appropriate to each Party, for each core and priority area; and reporting on activities through the bilateral agreements to support the Stage 1 roll out of the HCH model. The report to the COAG Health Council will include, but is not limited to: an overview of the current health system on coordinated care, at the commencement of the bilateral agreement; qualitative sections on each core and priority area; and an assessment against each of the key evaluation questions, drawing on implementation reports and the qualitative and quantitative data collected by jurisdictions. In applying the Evaluation Framework against activities, the following principles will apply: The Framework has been developed at a national level and it is acknowledged that not all dimensions or indicators will be relevant to all jurisdictions and therefore reporting will vary for each jurisdiction. Core and priority activities for all Parties will be assessed against the Framework; The evaluation questions and indicators enable joint reflection and support consistent data collection across jurisdictions and aggregated data analysis and reporting; All Parties will ensure appropriate privacy, ethics, c...
Evaluation Framework. The means the standards-based framework adopted by the State Board of Education for the evaluation of school counselors in accordance with R.C. 3319.113.
Evaluation Framework. An evaluation framework should be established, inter alia, to:
Evaluation Framework. The document created and approved by the State Board of Education in accordance with section 3319.111(A) of the O.R.C. that establishes the standards- based framework for the evaluation of teachers developed under section 3319.112 and 3319.114 of the O.R.C.
Evaluation Framework. Each teacher (including teachers who are in the RESA Program) will be evaluated according to the Ohio Teacher Evaluation System Framework, which is aligned with the “Standards for the Teaching Profession” adopted by ORC. Each teacher will be evaluated using the multiple factors set forth in the State Board of Education’s teacher evaluation framework. Using the multiple factors set forth in the Framework, the teacher’s Final Holistic Rating will be based upon a combination of informal and formal observations and supporting evidence using the Teacher Performance Evaluation Rubric.
Evaluation Framework. The WPREU was created in May 2012 to build on existing evaluation work, create an evaluation toolkit, establish a consistent approach to monitoring and evaluation of WP activities across the University, and deliver institution-specific WP related research. WPREU is implementing and developing an evaluation framework across a number of areas. Currently, we are: creating an institution-specific map and typology of WP activities to inform the further development of the evaluation framework; developing an evaluation toolkit (section 6.1.2); delivering a number of detailed evaluation projects (section 6.1.3); putting arrangements in place to track the progression of former participants (section 6.1.4); implementing a regular practitioner feedback cycle to ensure that WP practice across the university is informed by evaluation outcomes.
Evaluation Framework. The document approved by the Ohio Department of Education (ODE) in accordance with HB 64 passed in July 2015 directing the State Board of Education to develop a standard-based state framework for evaluation of school counselors. This framework, which is aligned to the Ohio Standards for School Counselors, was adopted by the SBOE in April 2016.
Evaluation Framework. Contractor shall use qualitative research methods to assist with informing the responses to the following questions from the pilot evaluation framework: • How well was the expansion pilot adopted by target staff, practices, and institutions? • Was the program implemented as planned? Were there any adaptations made? • What impact did the pilot have on the Administrative Entities tasked with administering the Blueprint for Health Programs/Community Health Teams? • What impact did the pilot have on Patient Centered Medical Homes? • What impact did the program have on other Mental Health, Substance Use Disorder, and Social Service Providers? • What impact did the pilot have on patients, families, caregivers, and their local communities? Were any Vermonters not previously engaged with a Patient Centered Medical Home able to benefit from any of these services?
