Evaluation Disputes Sample Clauses

Evaluation Disputes. The City and the Union agree to establish a Joint Evaluation Committee comprised of six (6) members, three (3) members from each Party (City and Library combined). The main purpose of the Committee will include, but is not limited to: - Review and update the language within the Job Evaluation Agreement (1979) to reflect current practices. - Review/resolve outstanding reclassification value disputes (internal comparators only). - Should the Committee be unable to join consensus, Steps 4 and 5 of the grievance procedure shall apply. It is further agreed that the Committee members for each party may be adjusted depending upon the nature of the topic/issue being discussed.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation Disputes. The Board and the Union agree to establish a Joint Evaluation Committee comprised of six (6) members, three (3) members from each party (City and Library combined). The main purpose of the Committee will include, but is not limited to: - Review and update the language within the Job Evaluation Agreement (1979) to reflect current practices. - Review/resolve outstanding reclassification value disputes (internal comparators only). - Should the Committee be unable to gain consensus, Steps 4 and 5 of the grievance procedure shall apply. It is further agreed that the Committee members for each party may be adjusted depending upon the nature of the topic/issue being discussed. SCHEDULE "G" – JOINT BENEFITS REVIEW COMMITTEE – LETTER OF INTENT‌ JOINT BENEFITS REVIEW COMMITTEE LETTER OF INTENT Between: THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF BURNABY And: THE CANADIAN UNION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 23 And: THE BURNABY FIREFIGHTERS' UNION, LOCAL 323 Subject: JOINT BENEFITS REVIEW COMMITTEE This Letter of Intent outlines the terms and conditions agreed to by the Joint Benefits Review Committee regarding the redesign of Disability Income Plans and Group Life Insurance; enhancements to Dental and Extended Health Benefits; and funding of the Employee Assistance Program. The proposed effective date of the changes is 1990 December 24 (except for those changes which cannot administratively be delivered); and is subject to ratification by all parties and other necessary approvals such as the Superintendent of Insurance, the membership of the Burnaby Municipal Benefit Society and the Superannuation Commissioner. The terms, conditions and definitions of coverage, rules and procedures, handling of CPP/WCB integration, subrogation and claims procedures for Disability Income Plans (Short Term Sick Leave, Medium Term Disability and Long Term Disability) will be identified in a Plan Document agreed to by all parties. In the absence of agreement by all parties to the wording of the initial Plan Document, this Letter of Intent will be considered to be terminated. The details of the changes agreed to by the parties for the various components of the plan are as follows: DISABILITY INCOME
Sample 1Sample 2See All (4)
Evaluation Disputes. The City and the Union agree to establish a Joint Evaluation Committee comprised of six (6) members, three
Sample 1Sample 2
Evaluation Disputes. Employees who disagree with their evaluation shall be afforded the opportunity to attach a written rebuttal to the evaluation, which shall be placed in the employee’s personnel file.
Sample 1

Related to Evaluation Disputes

  • Calculation Disputes If the Defaulting Party disputes the Non-Defaulting Party’s calculation of the Settlement Amount or Termination Payment, in whole or in part, the Defaulting Party will, within two Business Days of receipt of Non-Defaulting Party’s calculation, provide to the Non- Defaulting Party a detailed written explanation of the basis for such dispute; provided, however, that the Defaulting Party must first transfer Performance Assurance to the Non-Defaulting Party in an amount equal to the full Settlement Amount or Termination Payment, as applicable. References to Defaulting Party and Non-Defaulting Party in this Section include the Potentially Defaulting Party and Potentially Non-Defaulting Party, as applicable.

  • Payment Disputes We will not exercise Our rights under Section 6.3 (Overdue Charges) or 6.4 (Suspension of Service and Acceleration) above if You are disputing the applicable charges reasonably and in good faith and are cooperating diligently to resolve the dispute.

  • Arbitration of Disputes Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the breach thereof or otherwise arising out of the Executive’s employment or the termination of that employment (including, without limitation, any claims of unlawful employment discrimination whether based on age or otherwise) shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be settled by arbitration in any forum and form agreed upon by the parties or, in the absence of such an agreement, under the auspices of the American Arbitration Association (“AAA”) in Boston, Massachusetts in accordance with the Employment Dispute Resolution Rules of the AAA, including, but not limited to, the rules and procedures applicable to the selection of arbitrators. In the event that any person or entity other than the Executive or the Company may be a party with regard to any such controversy or claim, such controversy or claim shall be submitted to arbitration subject to such other person or entity’s agreement. Judgment upon the award rendered by the arbitrator may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. This Section 8 shall be specifically enforceable. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Section 8 shall not preclude either party from pursuing a court action for the sole purpose of obtaining a temporary restraining order or a preliminary injunction in circumstances in which such relief is appropriate; provided that any other relief shall be pursued through an arbitration proceeding pursuant to this Section 8.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.