Evaluation Conference/Cycle for Permanent Unit Members Sample Clauses

Evaluation Conference/Cycle for Permanent Unit Members. Permanent unit members with less than five (5) years of service within their current job classification shall be evaluated utilizing the Performance Appraisal Report Form in Appendix C every twelve (12) months. Permanent unit members with five (5) through eight (8) years of service within their current job classification shall be evaluated every twenty four (24) months. Permanent unit members with more than nine (9) years of service within their current job classification shall be evaluated every thirty six (36) months. Human Resources shall regularly notify the unit member’s supervisor of the unit member’s evaluation due date. Following best practices in employer/employee relations, supervisors and employees need to be continually engaged in providing constructive feedback to each other. Prior to the evaluation conference, the unit member and the supervisor will have the opportunity to complete the appropriate sections of the Performance Appraisal Report Form found in Appendix C. The Performance Appraisal Criteria & Definitions Guide is to be used to guide a constructive dialog between the supervisor and unit member during the conference. Written comments are not required by either party, however, if written comments are to be submitted, they must utilize the appropriate forms in Appendix C. The supervisor may ask the evaluee, or the evaluee may volunteer, to complete pages C-1 and C-2 of Appendix C which is the “self-evaluation.” If the evaluee elects to complete a “self-evaluation,” it shall be completed and submitted to their supervisor prior to the supervisor completing their evaluation. Following the evaluation conference, copies of each participant’s form shall be given to the unit member, supervisor and next level manager. These documents or any other written comments, if any, shall not become part of the unit member’s official personnel file. In contrast, job performance deficiencies of a serious or on-going nature shall be handled via the discipline process (Article XX).
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Evaluation Conference/Cycle for Permanent Unit Members

  • Annual Conference Vote This Disaffiliation Agreement must be “ratified by a simple majority of the members . . . present and voting” at a duly-called session of The Western North Carolina Annual Conference of The United Methodist Church, as required by Judicial Council Decision 1379 and ¶ 2529.1b(3)

  • Evaluation Conference The final evaluation conference shall occur not later than the end of the fall term. The purpose of the final evaluation conference is to discuss with the probationary employee the results of the evaluation and announce the team’s recommendation. The evaluation team shall determine what additional evaluation activity shall occur during the spring term. If the team recommends that the District not employ the professor for the following year, no evaluation activities in the spring are necessary.

  • PRE-JOB CONFERENCE Section 1. Upon written request by either Party, a pre-job conference will be held prior to the time the Employees of such Employer begin work on the project.

  • Church Conference Vote At least two-thirds (2/3) of the professing members present at a church conference of the Local Church must vote to disaffiliate from The United Methodist Church “for reasons of conscience regarding a change in the requirements and provisions of the Book of Discipline related to the practice of homosexuality or the ordination or marriage of self-avowed practicing homosexuals as resolved and adopted by the 2019 General Conference, or the actions or inactions of its annual conference related to these issues which follow.” Local Church shall provide documentation, to the satisfaction of Annual Conference, which evidences the result of the disaffiliation vote taken at the church conference. Such documentation must be certified by an authorized officer of Local Church and shall be included as an Exhibit A to this Disaffiliation Agreement.

  • JOINT CONFERENCE BOARD (a) A Joint Conference Board shall be formed which will be composed of the Board of Directors of the Boilermaker Contractors' Association of British Columbia, and Members of Local Lodge 359 as appointed by the Business Manager. The Joint Conference Board shall meet at least once during each calendar year or more periodically upon request.

  • Evaluation Cycle: Formative Assessment A) A specific purpose for evaluation is to promote student learning, growth and achievement by providing Educators with feedback for improvement. Evaluators are expected to make frequent unannounced visits to classrooms. Evaluators are expected to give targeted constructive feedback to Educators based on their observations of practice, examination of artifacts, and analysis of multiple measures of student learning, growth and achievement in relation to the Standards and Indicators of Effective Teaching Practice.

  • Evaluation Cycle Goal Setting and Development of the Educator Plan

  • Joint Job Evaluation Committee The parties entered into agreement December 17, 1992, to ensure the Joint Gender- Neutral Job Evaluation Plan remains current and operational and to that end endorsed the Joint Gender-Neutral Job Evaluation Maintenance Agreement. The parties agree that a guiding principle for the Committee is that there shall be no discrimination between male and female employees wherein a person of one sex is paid more than a person of the other sex for similar or substantially similar work.

  • Completion of Evaluation Cycle 1. The summative evaluation rating shall be based upon a preponderance of the evidence, assessed in a holistic manner, that is aligned to the Ohio Educator Standards. Only evidence gathered during the walkthroughs and formal observations that are conducted for the current school year may be used.

  • STATEWIDE ACHIEVEMENT TESTING When CONTRACTOR is an NPS, per implementation of Senate Bill 484, CONTRACTOR shall administer all Statewide assessments within the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (“CAASP”), Desired Results Developmental Profile (“DRDP”), California Alternative Assessment (“CAA”), achievement and abilities tests (using LEA-authorized assessment instruments), the Fitness Gram with the exception of the English Language Proficiency Assessments for California (“ELPAC”) to be completed by the LEA, and as appropriate to the student, and mandated by XXX xxxxxxxx to LEA and state and federal guidelines. CONTRACTOR is subject to the alternative accountability system developed pursuant to Education Code section 52052, in the same manner as public schools. Each LEA student placed with CONTRACTOR by the LEA shall be tested by qualified staff of CONTRACTOR in accordance with that accountability program. XXX shall provide test administration training to CONTRACTOR’S qualified staff. CONTRACTOR shall attend LEA test training and comply with completion of all coding requirements as required by XXX.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.