Evaluation Appeals. 6-5-1 During the post-conference observation, the employee has the right to review and rebut any evidence the administrator used in the administrator’s findings. If the rebuttal provides clear and convincing evidence to the contrary, as agreed upon by the administrator and teacher, the evaluation must be changed to reflect the evidence.
Evaluation Appeals. RNs may request a review of their evaluations by filing a Date Accepted Accepted by ONA / / 28 written appeal with the Vice President of Patient Care (or designee). ONA St. Xxxxxxx Hospital Date of Proposal: / / 1 If desired, the nurse may present the appeal personally with an ONA representative in 2 attendance. The nurse may provide a written response which shall be attached to the 3 evaluation. 5 The decision of the Vice president of Patient Care will be final and binding and not 6 subject to the grievance procedure. 8 Appeals, to be timely, must be submitted by January 1 of the following year. The Vice 9 President of Patient Care will consider all appeals on the second Monday and Tuesday 10 of January and will issue a decision on all appeals by January 15.
Evaluation Appeals. The Board shall pre-schedule four (4) evaluation appeal hearings on an annual basis. An independent note- taker will be selected as a non-participating member of the Appeal Committee. The Board and AEL shall equally share the cost of the note-taker. INDEX Accumulated Leave, 11 Acting Status, 11 Adoption Leave, 18 Advertising the Vacancy, 22 Advice, 6, 26 AEL Membership, 6 AEL's Obligation Regarding Performance of Duties, 6 Annual Leave, 16 Application, 22 Assault Leave, 18 Authority and Responsibility, 23 Authority for Assignment, 24 Authority of the Board, 3 Awarding of Degree, 17 Bank Deposit of Payroll Checks, 11 Benefits During Sabbatical Leave, 15 Bereavement, 17 Board Data for Negotiations Proposals, 6 Board Information, 26 Board Meetings, Agenda and Minutes, 5 Board Meetings, Recognition, 6 Calendar Committee, 6 Citizenship Rights, 7 Contract Renewal, 19 Controversial Issues, 6 Court Summons, 17 Curriculum Development, 8 Definition of "Board" and "AEL", 3 Definition of "Items", 3 Definition of "Unit II Employee", 3 Doctoral Degree Stipend, 9 Duty Days, 19 Effect of Agreement on Other Policies, 4 Effective Dates of Items and Agreement, 4 Emergency Closing, 24 Evaluation Appeals, 27 Evaluation and Rating of Unit II, 21 Evaluation of Applicants by Committee, 23 Exchange of Communications, 5 Experience Credit, 14 Facilities Planning, 6 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) Leave, 18 Grievance Records, 26 Grievance Time Limit, 26 Grievance, Definitions, 25 Grievance, Procedure, 25 Healthcare, 11 Hearings Release Time, 26 Identical Data, 8 Illness in Immediate Family, 13 Injury on the Job, 17 Interview Committee, 22 Involuntary Reassignment, 11 Jury Duty, 17 Leave for President, 5 Leaves of Absence, 15 Liability Insurance, 13 Lost Time, 11 National Board Certification Stipend, 9 Nomination of Candidate(s), 23 Non-Discrimination, 6 Non-Discrimination by AEL, 4 Non-Restraint/Employees' Rights, 6 Notification of Applicants, 23 Notification of Assignment, 24 Other Leaves, 16 Other Personnel Policies, 24 Parties to the Agreement, 3 Payroll Deduction - Insurance Programs, 5 Payroll Deduction Unit II Dues, 5 Performance Pay, 9 Period of Leave, 15 Personal Business Leave, 17 Personal Property Damages, 8 Personnel File, 6 Planning Assistance, 21 Political Rights, 7 Position Changes, 10 Positions to be Covered, 22 Printing and Distributing Agreement, 4 Processing Grievances, 26 Professional Improvement, 20 Provisions for Resigning, 19 Recognition During Board Meetings, 6...
Evaluation Appeals. 1. Overall “Standard” Evaluation An employee at his/her discretion may submit a written comment to an overall satisfactory evaluation. The Employer’s response or non-response to the employee’s comment on an overall satisfactory evaluation shall not be subject to the grievance procedure.
Evaluation Appeals. Any teacher who receives a summative rating of “Unsatisfactory” may appeal such evaluation by submitting to the Superintendent, within ten (10) school days of the teacher’s receipt of the evaluation, the following documents: A letter identifying the evaluation summative evaluation rating of Unsatisfactory which the teacher wishes to appeal; A copy of the evaluation; A copy of any prior evaluation the teacher wishes to be considered; and A copy of any additional evidence or document the teacher wishes to be considered. The Superintendent shall promptly convene the Panel of Qualified Evaluators (“the Panel”) agreed to by the PERA Joint Committee and forward to the Panel the appeal and related documents submitted by the teacher. The Panel shall meet at least once, with the first meeting occurring no more than ten (10) school days after its receipt of the appeal. The Panel shall have the power to collect, review and command the provision of additional evidence as it deems necessary. The Panel shall apply the criteria determined by the PERA Joint Committee for successful appeals and shall have the power to revoke an “Unsatisfactory” rating it deems erroneous. If the Panel revokes an “Unsatisfactory” rating, the rating shall be replaced with a “Needs Improvement” rating unless a majority of the Panel finds that another rating is appropriate. The Panel shall issue a written decision, which shall be final. A copy of the decision 26 shall be given to the teacher who filed the appeal and to the Superintendent. The time for the development of a remediation plan shall be tolled from the date the appeal is filed with the Superintendent until the date the Panel issues its written decision. No later than February 1st of each year, the PERA Joint Committee shall meet and, together with any other business of the Committee, prepare and submit to the Board and the Association 1) the identity of the Panel of Qualified Evaluators and 2) the criteria for successful appeals.
Evaluation Appeals. 1. Teachers may appeal their summary evaluation based on a lack of adherence to the procedures outlined in the current Teacher Evaluation System Handbook. A teacher may submit an appeal of his/her Instructional Practice Score (IPS) rating within 10 days of the close of the end-of-the-year evaluation deadline and receipt of the IPS score. Appeals of the Student Performance Rating and/or final summary evaluation rating will be submitted by the teacher within 10 working days after receipt of the overall summary evaluation to the Executive Director of Human Resources. Appeals are to be submitted in writing on the Teacher Summary Evaluation Appeals Form located in the TES Handbook along with all supporting documentation. The Teacher Evaluation Appeals Form will be developed in collaboration with the Association.
Evaluation Appeals. The District and the DCFT will have a mutually agreed upon appeal process for hearing and ruling on appeals of summative evaluation ratings by non-probationary teachers.
Evaluation Appeals. An employee who is in disagreement with their evaluation may include a written statement for their personnel file, and/or request a meeting with the Program Director to discuss the disagreement. If the employee wishes to appeal the evaluation to their Program Director, they will sign the evaluation indicating disagreement and within ten (10) working days submit a written request to meet with the Program Director, with a copy to the Union, the immediate supervisor, and the HR Director. The request for an appeal meeting must contain:
Evaluation Appeals. RNs may request a review of their evaluations by filing a written appeal with the Vice President of Patient Care (or designee). 24 If desired, the nurse may present the appeal personally with an ONA 25 representative in attendance. The nurse may provide a written response which shall be attached to the evaluation. Page 14 of 86 Date Accepted / / Accepted by ONA Accepted by Employer 26 27 14 Date of Proposal: 06 / 12 / 12__ ONA 🡪 St. Xxxxxxx Hospital 2 The decision of the Vice president of Patient Care will be final and binding and not subject to the grievance procedure.
Evaluation Appeals. Evaluation reports express the judgment and opinions of supervisory authority, and as such are grievable only to the extent that the evaluation procedure was not followed. When a unit member believes that he or she has been unfairly or improperly evaluated, such unit member shall have the right to submit a written signed rebuttal to the report which shall be attached to the evaluation report and included in the unit member's permanent file.
