Evaluation and Award Process. After determining that a bid satisfies the mandatory requirements stated in the RFP, the LEA shall use both objective analysis and subjective judgment in conducting a comparative assessment of the bid. The LEA must evaluate the bids and must state in the RFP/ contract how they plan to evaluate the bids. Weight Criteria points Price/Cost (price must be primary factor) points Service Capability Plan points Experience, References points Financial, Condition/Stability, Business Practices points Accounting and Reporting Systems points Personnel Management points Innovation points Promotion of the School Food Service Program points Involvement of Students, Staff, and Patrons 00 Total (Must equal 100) While price alone is not the sole basis for award, price remains the primary consideration when awarding a contract under the competitive proposal method. Price/cost must be assigned the greatest number of points. The LEA’s officers, employees, board members, or agents shall neither solicit nor accept gratuities, favors, nor anything of monetary value from contractors nor potential contractors. To the extent permissible under state law, rules, or regulations, such standards shall be provided for appropriate penalties, sanctions, or other disciplinary actions to be applied for violations of such standards.
Evaluation and Award Process. 1. Proposal Evaluation Process To participate in the RFP process, each Proposer must submit its Proposal prior to the Submittal Deadline at the Submittal Location, as specified on the Schedule. Each Proposal will first be reviewed by staff to ensure: (1) that the Proposal is responsive to the RFP (includes all of the required submittals and reflects the Concession Opportunity); and (2) that the Proposer is responsible (meets the Minimum Qualifications defined in Part III.2, as shown through its Statement of Minimum Qualifications and supporting documentation). If a Proposal is deemed non‐responsive or the Proposer is deemed non‐responsible, the Proposal will be rejected. If the Proposal is deemed responsive and the Proposer is deemed responsible, the Proposal will then be reviewed and evaluated by an evaluation panel against the Evaluation Criteria set forth in Submittal C.
Evaluation and Award Process. The IRG Procurement Officer will award an agreement contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible Seller (bidder) whose offer conforms to the RFQ/RFP will be most advantageous to IRG, price and other factors considered. The award will be made to the Seller representing the best value to the project and to IRG. For the purpose of this RFQ/RFP, price, delivery, technical and past performance are of equal importance for the purposes of evaluating, and selecting the “best value” awardee. IRG intends to evaluate offers and award an Agreement without discussions with Xxxxxxx. Therefore, the Seller’s initial offer should contain the Seller’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint. However, IRG reserves the right to conduct discussions if later determined by the IRG Procurement Officer to be necessary. The evaluation factors will be comprised of the following criteria:
Evaluation and Award Process. The RTI Procurement Officer will award an agreement contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible Seller (bidder) whose offer conforms to the RFQ/RFP will be most advantageous to RTI, price and other factors considered. The award will be made to the Seller representing the best value to the project and to RTI. For the purpose of this RFQ/RFP, price, delivery, technical and past performance are of equal importance for the purposes of evaluating, and selecting the “best value” awardee. RTI intends to evaluate offers and award an Agreement without discussions with Xxxxxxx. Therefore, the Seller’s initial offer should contain the Seller’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint. However, RTI reserves the right to conduct discussions if later determined by the RTI Procurement Officer to be necessary. The evaluation factors will be comprised of the following criteria:
Evaluation and Award Process. The RTI Agreement Officer will award an agreement resulting from this solicitation to the responsible Applicant whose offer conforms to the RFA and will be most advantageous to RTI, price and other factors, as outlined in this RFA, considered. The award will be made to the Applicant representing the best value to the project and to RTI. For the purpose of this RFA, price, delivery, technical and past performance are of equal importance for the purposes of evaluating, and selecting the “best value” awardee. RTI intends to evaluate offers and award an Agreement without discussions with Applicants. Therefore, the Applicant’s initial offer should contain the Applicant’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint. However, RTI reserves the right to conduct discussions if later determined by the RTI Agreement Officer to be necessary. The criteria, and corresponding scoring weights, that will be used during the evaluation process are listed below: The composition and technical approach of the application (30%) Recent experience, current presence, and demonstrated working relationships with the Federal Government and in the regions(s) of interest (20%) The price in relation to the value offered by the application (20%) The organization’s technical and logistical capacity, including available and proposed resources (10%) Demonstrated knowledge of the country and of the region(s) of interest (10%)
