EVALATION CRITERIA Sample Clauses

EVALATION CRITERIA. FACTOR(S) Evaluation Criteria Points Factor #1 Verifiable experience in reviewing child welfare cases using the current CFSA/DBH QSR Shared Practice Protocol or an earlier version no more than five years old; experience conducting interviews, completing data sheets. 20 Factor #2 Ability to document results of reviews in a clear, concise written summary. Ability to complete summary to agency specifications within five working days of the end of the review. 20 Factor #3 Ability to analyze facts, draw conclusions, and consider alternative options for follow up. 10 Factor #4 Superior oral and written communication skills. Ability to make accurate summaries of facts and prepare reports, opinions and findings. Ability to give feedback to staff in a supportive, learning-based manner. 15 Factor #5 Knowledge of automated office systems and equipment; ability to use computer equipment and software (in particular Microsoft word). 10 Total 75 TECHNICAL EXPERTISE (75 Points Maximum) The price evaluation will be objective. The offeror with the lowest price will receive the maximum price points. All other proposals will receive a proportionately lower total score. The following formula will be used to determine each offeror's evaluated price score:
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
EVALATION CRITERIA. FACTOR(S) Evaluation Criteria Points Factor #1 Verifiable experience in reviewing child welfare cases using the current CFSA/DBH QSR Shared Practice Protocol or an earlier version no more than five years old; experience conducting interviews, completing data sheets and contractor’s availability. 20 Factor #2 Ability to document results of reviews in a clear, concise written summary. Ability to complete summary to agency specifications within five working days of the end of the review. 20 Factor #3 Ability to analyze facts, draw conclusions, and consider alternative options for follow up. 10 Factor #4 Superior oral and written communication skills. Ability to make accurate summaries of facts and prepare reports, opinions and findings. Ability to give feedback to staff in a supportive, learning-based manner. 15 Factor #5 Knowledge of automated office systems and equipment; ability to use computer equipment and software (in particular Microsoft word). 10 Total 75 TECHNICAL EXPERTISE (75 Points Maximum) The price evaluation will be objective. The offeror with the lowest price will receive the maximum price points. All other proposals will receive a proportionately lower total score. The following formula will be used to determine each offeror's evaluated price score:
Sample 1

Related to EVALATION CRITERIA

  • Evaluation Criteria 5.2.1. The responses will be evaluated based on the following: (edit evaluation criteria below as appropriate for your project)

  • Exclusion Criteria Subjects fulfilling any of the following criteria are not eligible for participation in this study.

  • Selection Criteria Each Contract is secured by a new or used Motorcycle. No Contract has a Contract Rate less than 1.00%. Each Contract amortizes the amount financed over an original term no greater than 84 months (excluding periods of deferral of first payment). Each Contract has a Principal Balance of at least $500.00 as of the Cutoff Date.

  • Additional RO Review Criteria (1) In addition to the requirements in Subparagraph 34A, the RO must:

  • Origin Criteria For the goods that meet the origin criteria, the exporter should indicate in Box 8 of this Form, the origin criteria met, in the manner shown in the following table: Circumstances of production or manufacture in the country named in Box 11 of this form: Insert in Box 8

  • Design Criteria The Engineer shall develop the roadway design criteria based on the controlling factors specified by the State (i.e. 4R, 3R, 2R, or special facilities), by use of the funding categories, design speed, functional classification, roadway class and any other set criteria as set forth in PS&E Preparation Manual, Roadway Design Manual, Bridge Design Manual, Hydraulic Design Manual, and other deemed necessary State approved manuals. In addition, the Engineer shall prepare the Design Summary Report (DSR) and submit it electronically. The Engineer shall obtain written concurrence from the State prior to proceeding with a design if any questions arise during the design process regarding the applicability of State’s design criteria.

  • Qualification Criteria The College may offer or an employee may request an early retirement incentive provided the employee meets the following qualifications:

  • Promotional Criteria Subject to the utilisation of the skills, as required by the Employer, an employee remains at this level until he/she has developed the skills to allow the employee to effectively perform the tasks required of this function and is assessed to be competent to perform effectively at a higher level or has successfully completed appropriate training to ASF level 1 and has the demonstrated skills to perform at a higher level. An employee must be prepared to undertake appropriate training. LEVEL 3

  • Study Population ‌ Infants who underwent creation of an enterostomy receiving postoperative care and awaiting enterostomy closure: to be assessed for eligibility: n = 201 to be assigned to the study: n = 106 to be analysed: n = 106 Duration of intervention per patient of the intervention group: 6 weeks between enterostomy creation and enterostomy closure Follow-up per patient: 3 months, 6 months and 12 months post enterostomy closure, following enterostomy closure (12-month follow-up only applicable for patients that are recruited early enough to complete this follow-up within the 48 month of overall study duration).

  • Acceptance Criteria 6.7.2.1. During the test there shall be no evidence of:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.