Ethical consideration Sample Clauses

Ethical consideration. ‌ In order, to protect the rights of research participants, ethical approval was sought from the Sogn og Fjordane University College. Permission to collect data was equally obtained from the nursing home and residential home unit to allow us collect data from nurses. The nature and purpose of the study was explained and the participants were informed of their rights regarding the study in which they participated voluntarily. They were further informed of their liberty to withdraw from the study at any time if they so wished and that the information collected from them was kept in strict confidence. In order to maintain the participants‟ confidentiality, the interview did not bear any identifying features of the participant such as name and physical abode. RESULTS OF EMPIRICAL DATA
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Ethical consideration. This study was submitted to the Institutional Review Board at Emory University and determined to meet the criteria for exemption.
Sample 1
Ethical consideration. Ethical clearance was obtained from the respective school of public health, and AAU College of health science ethical committees. A formal letter was also submitted to all the concerned bodies to obtain their co-operation. The right and autonomy of all participants were respected. They were given any information they needed, verbally and in writing. The participation was voluntarily and they can withdraw from the study at any time without explanation and without penalty or loss of benefit. The autonomy of each participant was assured unless they needed assistance in filling out the questionnaire. In such cases, confidentiality was assured and no personal details were recorded or produced on any documentation related to the study.
Sample 1
Ethical consideration. Emory University's Institutional review board (IRB) and Xxxxx Research Oversight Committee approved the FACS study, and the PI of FACS study shared the data after removing all Protected Health Information (PHI). Only the PI has access to the data and the code that links any identifiers to the participants.
Sample 1
Ethical consideration. The Institutional Review Board of Emory University in the United States determined this project (IRB00081173) did not qualify as human subjects research and was granted exemption status. Additionally, protocol and research instruments were submitted to the Ethics Research Committee of the Ministère de la santé et de la lutte contre le SIDA in Côte d’Ivoire for review and approval was granted. Quality Control Both the qualitative and quantitative data were anonymous, and no identifying information was attained or stored. Upon completion of transcription, all voice recordings of FGDs and IDIs were destroyed.
Sample 1
Ethical consideration. ‌ All research in this study was undertaken in accordance with the NUGSE code of ethics. The research did not include the financial cost of participating. The research does not analyse individual-specific teacher or school responses but rather builds general results. It is considered no more than minimal risk since the research involves human subjects who are older than 18 years old. Considering the anonymity or confidentiality of the survey participants, it is strictly anonymous. Only your age, gender, country of origin, subjects taught, dominant language, years of experience of teachers, school type, and school name are asked in the questionnaire. Only the researcher and the research advisor will have access to the digital data. Full consent is obtained from the participants prior to the study.
Sample 1
Ethical consideration. The first Ethical clearance and approval were granted by Mekelle University, college of health sciences ethical clearance committee and the second was from KA-HDSS head office. CONFLICT OF INTEREST The authors have no conflict of interest REFERENCES
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Ethical consideration

  • Ethical Considerations The study will be conducted in accordance with ethical principles founded in the Declaration of Helsinki. The Institutional Review Board (IRB)/Independent Ethics Committee (IEC) will review all appropriate study documentation in order to safeguard the rights, safety and well-being of the subjects. The study can only be conducted at study sites where IRB/IEC approval has been obtained. The protocol, informed consent form, Investigator’s Brochure, advertisements (if applicable), and all other forms of information given to subjects will be provided to the IRB/IEC by the Investigator. In addition, reports on the progress of the study will be submitted to the IRB/IEC by the Investigator at the appropriate intervals.

  • General Considerations a. All reports, drawings, designs, specifications, notebooks, computations, details, and calculation documents prepared by Vendor and presented to the Board pursuant to this Agreement are and remain the property of the Board as instruments of service.

  • RISK CONSIDERATION There are no significant risks associated with the recommendations contained within this report. This application may be considered under existing MPS policies. Community Council has the discretion to make decisions that are consistent with the MPS, and such decisions may be appealed to the N.S. Utility and Review Board. Information concerning risks and other implications of adopting the proposed development agreement are contained within the Discussion section of this report. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS No environmental implications are identified.

  • First Consideration The Employer agrees that when a vacancy occurs or a new position is created at the worksite which is within the Union bargaining unit, the Employer shall give its employees, provided there are no employees currently on lay-off, first notice and first consideration in filling the vacancy or new position. Each employee who applies for the vacancy or new position shall be given equal opportunity to demonstrate fitness for the position by formal interview and/or assessment. Where an employee within the bargaining unit is not appointed to fill the vacancy or new position, she shall be given, upon request, an explanation as to why her application was not accepted. The request for reasons must be made within fourteen (14) calendar days of becoming aware that the employee is not the successful candidate, pursuant to Article

  • Special Considerations Special considerations in determining allowability of compensation will be given to any change in a non-Federal entity's compensation policy resulting in a substantial increase in its employees' level of compensation (particularly when the change was concurrent with an increase in the ratio of Federal awards to other activities) or any change in the treatment of allowability of specific types of compensation due to changes in Federal policy.

  • Additional Consideration Retrocessionaire agrees to pay under the Inuring Retrocessions all future premiums Retrocedant is obligated to pay pursuant to the terms of the Inuring Retrocessions to the extent that such premiums are allocable to Retrocessionaire in the manner set forth in Exhibit E hereto, and not otherwise paid by Retrocessionaire and to indemnify Retrocedant for all such premiums paid directly by Retrocedant, net of any ceding commissions and similar amounts paid by Third Party Retrocessionaires to Retrocedant.

  • Additional Considerations For each mediation or arbitration:

  • FINANCIAL CONSIDERATION A. The College/University and the Facility shall each bear their own costs associated with this Agreement and no payment is required by either the College/University or the Facility to the other party, except that, where applicable, the Facility shall pay the tuition and other educational fees of students it places in the clinical experience program.

  • Environmental Considerations A. Company, its officers, agents, servants, employees, invitees, independent contractors, successors, and assigns will not discharge or spill any Hazardous Substance, as defined herein, into any component of the storm drainage system or onto any paved or unpaved area within the boundaries of the Premises. In addition, Company will not discharge or spill any Hazardous Substance into any component of the sanitary sewer system without first neutralizing or treating same as required by applicable anti-pollution laws or ordinances, in a manner satisfactory to Authority and other public bodies, federal, state, or local, having jurisdiction over or responsibility for the prevention of pollution of canals, streams, rivers, and other bodies of water. Company’s discharge, spill or introduction of any Hazardous Substance onto the Premises or into any component of Authority’s sanitary or storm drainage systems will, if not remedied by Company with all due dispatch, at the sole discretion of Authority, be deemed a default and cause for termination of this Agreement by Authority, subject to notice and cure. Such termination will not relieve Company of or from liability for such discharge or spill.

  • Independent Consideration Contemporaneously with the execution and delivery of this Agreement, Buyer has paid to Seller as further consideration for this Agreement, in cash, the sum of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) (the “Independent Consideration”), in addition to the Deposit and the Purchase Price and independent of any other consideration provided hereunder, which Independent Consideration is fully earned by Seller and is non-refundable under any circumstances.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.