Environmental Evaluation. Within ninety (90) days of any change in the Fuel Facility Manager (and the Facility Manager, if the Facility Manager is responsible for the QTA Equipment and Operator Vehicle Maintenance Equipment), the Operators shall, at their sole cost and expense though the in-coming or out-going Fuel Facility Manager, conduct an Environmental Assessment of the Consolidated Rental Car Facility Site and specifically the Fuel Facilities, the QTA Equipment and the Operator Vehicle Maintenance Equipment to identify, to extent practicable, the nature and extent of any Hazardous Substances, if any, present on the Consolidated Rental Car Facility Site since the Pre-Lease Environmental Evaluation or any prior Environmental Assessment pursuant to this Section 19.1.1.3. Prior to conducting the Environmental Assessment, the Operators shall consult with the Port in the preparation of an assessment plan or plans, and shall submit the plan to the Port no less than thirty (30) days prior to the initiation of the plan(s). The Port shall have fourteen (14) days after submittal of a plan to review and approve or disapprove the plan, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. The results of the plan(s) will be compiled in a report and shall set forth any change in the environmental condition of the Consolidated Rental Car Facility Site since the Pre-Lease Environmental Condition or any prior evaluation pursuant to this Section 19.1.1.3. Any contamination identified shall be subject to remediation as more particularly set forth in ARTICLE 18 and this ARTICLE 19.
Environmental Evaluation. The Concession Contractor shall be evaluated by Reclamation on its environmental performance under this Concession Contract including, without limitation, compliance with the approved EMP and on the following criteria.
Environmental Evaluation. “Environmental Evaluation” shall mean that limited review of higher-risk operational environmental practices of the Incumbent Companies conducted on behalf of the Port prior to the Commencement Date of the Lease.
Environmental Evaluation. A. Review the site and develop design guidance through a jurisdictional determination.
Environmental Evaluation. This scope assumes the intent of the proposed construction activities is to design and construct the proposed improvements in accordance with the terms and conditions of either Nationwide Permit (NWP) 3, Maintenance, Nationwide Permit (NWP) 12, Utility Line Activities, or Nationwide Permit (NWP) 13, Bank Stabilization without requiring the preparation and submittal of a Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). If bank stabilization activities will be more than 500 linear feet in length along the bank, the amount of fill will exceed an average of one cubic yard per running foot placed along the bank below the plane of the ordinary high water mark, there will be a discharge into a wetland or other special aquatic site, or if other PCN criteria are met, then the submittal of a PCN to the USACE will be required. If a PCN or other Section 404 permit authorization from the USACE (e.g., Individual Permit) is required for the proposed project, then those services can be provided by ENGINEER as an Additional Service. ENGINEER will render the following professional services, with the development of the Project, as follows:
Environmental Evaluation. PBS will identify and map the extent of wetlands within the project area and collect enough information to accurately rate the wetlands using the Washington Department of Ecology’s Wetland Rating System for Western Washington. Wetland boundaries will be recorded in the field using mapping grade GPS receiver with +/‐ 3 feet of accuracy. The Ordinary High‐Water Mark (OHWM) of the unnamed tributary to the East Fork Xxxxx River will be identified and flagged in the field for subsequent survey. • A brief memorandum that details the results of the field work and summarizes the mapped resources and buffers will be completed. A graphic containing the extents and appropriate buffers from these features will be developed. Digital files of the mapped resources and buffers will be supplied to the engineering team for use in preliminary design and alternative analysis. Deliverables • Mapped wetlands and OHWM • Critical area summarization memo and graphic • Digital boundaries for wetlands, OHWM, and buffers • Consultation as needed with engineering staff regarding potential impacts / mitigation permitting
Environmental Evaluation. An ecological assessment consisting of:
Environmental Evaluation. In terms of environmental impact, the automatic in-situ consolidation of thermoplastic materials manufacturing process represents an alternative, very beneficial in terms environmental sustainability, to autoclave manufacturing processes (low environmentally optimized), and involve significant advantages in terms of environmental sustainability Continuing with the approach set out in the D1.1 technical report ref[4], has been tested the substantial benefits in terms of composite and ancillary material wastes, energy saving, natural resources outcome and recyclability. In addition this processing methodology allows complying with legal requirements. In addition, thermoplastics can be remolded and recycled directly by remelting heating up above a specific temperature, without negatively affecting the material’s physical properties. This characteristic allows, by one hand, to increase the lifetime of the product, thanks to the ability to reprocess and repair some defective parts, and by other, recycling the end life structure. An impact assessment has been performed by comparison between TS ATL+AC and TP ISC achieving the following results on a unitary 1000x1000 mm Omega-stiffened flat panel, a simplification of a representative typical A/C structure: Figure 13: Environmental benefits Figure 14: Impact benchmarking (TP ISC vs TS Autoclave) By means of a standardized and structured analysis has been demonstrated that ISC process can be considered to be eco-friendly and green, above all, in terms of energies, wastes, and materials. Current and future waste management and environmental legislations require all materials to be properly recovered and recycled. Potential advantages for the aerospace sector, as we have seen, lie in the lower energy and auxiliary materials consumption, the possibility of recycling, and longer live cycle. · Decreasing energy consumption · Reduce waste · Material intakes · Increasing the potential recyclability (prepreg and final structure) · Increasing the lifetime of the structure (reprocessing and reparability) POSITIVES · Complexity of process (high temperature)
Environmental Evaluation. Great American has completed an environmental evaluation of the Xxxxx Mine and accepts the Xxxxx Mine in its current environmental condition. In the event Great American exercises its Option, Great American shall assume all of Xxxxx' environmental reclamation and clean-up liabilities which are not covered by the Vista Lease, including environmental conditions that pre-dates the Effective Date of this Agreement. Great American shall reclaim any disturbance, including drilling, created by its activities under this Agreement in accordance with applicable rules and regulations of the appropriate state and federal agencies.
Environmental Evaluation. Buyer may (at its option and expense) retain a qualified and recognized environmental audit and compliance review firm to perform an environmental evaluation of the properties of the Subsidiaries (the "Environmental Evaluation"). The scope of the Environmental Evaluation shall generally be that of a Phase One study. Buyer must complete such Environmental Evaluation no later than September 15, 1995.
