ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION. The proposed action is not a project as defined by 14 California Code of Regulations 15378 (State CEQA Guidelines) and therefore CEQA is not applicable.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION. This Resolution is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources Code §§ 2100, et seq., “CEQA”) and CEQA regulations (14 California Code of Regulations §§ 15000, et seq.) because it establishes rules and procedures to implement government funding mechanisms; does not involve any commitment to a specific project which could result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment; and constitutes an organizational or administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. Accordingly, this Resolution does not constitute a “project” that requires environmental review (see specifically 14 CCR § 15378(b)(4-5)).
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION. A Categorical Exclusion (CE) for the project was signed by FRA on May 5, 2014 and a subsequent NEPA Re-Evaluation Form was signed by FRA on July 3, 2014.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION. The project will include an environmental determination, anticipated to be a Simple Written Record. Work Element 2: Specification Package Development Elements of the specification development will be prepared per applicable FAA Advisory Circulars (AC), Orders, Regulations and Policy Memorandums. The consultant shall provide service to include development of contract documents and specifications for SRE acquisition to meet procurement guidelines associated with the FAA Airport Improvement Program. SRE and accessories acquisition shall meet the requirements of SAE ARP 5564 as defined under FAA AC 150/5220-20A Airport Snow and Ice Control Equipment and FAA AC 150/5200-30D Airport Winder Safety and Operations. The consultant will also meet City ordinances and procurement requirements. Specific tasks included with this work element include:
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION. Task 4.1 - Environmental Considerations – SEH will complete a request for environmental Categorical Exclusion (CATEX) for the project. SEH will also identify necessary permits, including but not limited to NPDES and developing a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) in concert with preliminary erosion control plans, if required for contractor to procure. Work Element 5: Preliminary Design
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION. In April 2021, a notice of exemption (XXX) was filed with Marin County for the Grand Avenue Cycle Track Project for categorical exemption based on Existing Facilities (§15301).
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION. Determine item is exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines 15060 (c)(2). In accordance with this section, an activity is not subject to CEQA if it will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. The ownership, OM&R, use, interconnections, financial responsibilities, and sharing of responsibilities at Xxxx Substation, as described in the Eldorado Xxxx OM&R Agreement, will not result in any physical change in the environment; therefore, this activity is not subject to CEQA. City Administrative Officer (CAP) Report The CAO Report dated November 21,2017 is attached.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION. The environmental factors checked below ( ) would be potentially affected by the proposed project, as indicated by the evaluation in Sections 1 to Section 18. Table 20 Potentially Significant Project Impacts Aesthetics Hazards/Hazardous Materials Recreation Agriculture Resources Hydrology/Water Quality Transportation/Traffic Air Quality Land Use/Planning Utilities/Service Systems Biological Resources Mineral Resources Mandatory Findings of Significance Cultural Resources Noise None Geology/Soils Population/Housing Greenhouse Gases Public Services None of the environmental factors are "Potentially Significant Impacts." DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potential significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" on the environment, but at least one effect (1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and (2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Signature Date Printed Name For
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION. The purpose of the environmental review process is to provide information about the environmental effects of the actions and decisions made by LAFCO and to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). In this case, it has been determined with certainty that there is no possibility that the project may have a significant environmental effect on the environment and therefore it is found to be exempt from CEQA pursuant to section 15061(b)(3) of the State Guidelines. The Local Agency Formation Commission will file this Notice of Exemption upon approval of the Outside User Agreement.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION. The Economic Development Assistance Program for Office Depot and the Sales Tax Sharing Agreement are not “projects” for the purposes of CEQA, as that term is defined by the California Environmental Quality Act. The Office Depot development has been properly mitigated and controlled by prior development approvals and precise plans. There is sufficient office space for the 13 additional employees, as well as on-site parking. Reviewed by: Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Attachments:
