Environmental and Social Performance. Unless MCC and the Government agree otherwise in writing, the Government will ensure that all Projects and Activities undertaken, funded or otherwise supported in whole or in part (directly or indirectly) by MCC Funding under the Compact comply with the MCC Environmental Guidelines, including the environmental and social performance standards set forth in the Performance Standards on Environmental and Social Sustainability of the International Finance Corporation (as in effect from time to time, the “IFC Performance Standards”) that have been incorporated by reference into the MCC Environmental Guidelines. The Government also will ensure that the Projects and Activities comply with all national environmental laws and regulations, licenses and permits, except to the extent such compliance would be inconsistent with the Compact. Unless MCC agrees otherwise in writing, the Government will fund all necessary costs of environmental and social mitigation measures (including, without limitation, costs of resettlement) not specifically provided for, or that exceed the MCC Funding specifically allocated for such costs in, the Detailed Financial Plan for any Project or Activity.
Environmental and Social Performance. Unless MCC and the Government agree otherwise in writing, the Government shall ensure that all Projects and Activities undertaken, funded, or otherwise supported in whole or in part (directly or indirectly) by MCC Funding under the Compact comply with the Environmental Guidelines, including the environmental and social performance standards set forth in the IFC Performance Standards that have been incorporated by reference into the Environmental Guidelines. The Government also shall ensure that the Projects and Activities comply with all national environmental laws and regulations, licenses and permits, except to the extent such compliance would be inconsistent with the Compact. Where there is a difference between national environmental laws and regulations and the standards required by the Compact, the Government shall ensure that the stricter standard is followed. Unless MCC agrees otherwise in writing, the Government shall fund all costs of environmental and social mitigation measures necessary for the Program (including, without limitation, costs of resettlement) that are not specifically provided for in the Compact, or that exceed the amount of MCC Funding and/or Government Contribution specifically allocated for such costs in the Detailed Financial Plan for any Project or Activity.
Environmental and Social Performance. Unless MCC and the Government agree otherwise in writing, the Government shall ensure that all Projects and Activities undertaken, funded or otherwise supported in whole or in part (directly or indirectly) by MCC Funding under the Compact comply with the MCC Environmental Guidelines, including the environmental and social performance standards set forth in the Performance Standards on Environmental and Social Sustainability of the International Finance Corporation (as in effect from time to time, the “IFC Performance Standards”) that have been incorporated by reference into the MCC Environmental Guidelines. The Government shall also ensure that the Projects and Activities comply with all national environmental laws and regulations, licenses and permits, except to the extent such compliance would be inconsistent with the Compact. Where there is a difference between national environmental laws and regulations and the standards required by the Compact, the Government shall ensure that the stricter standard is followed provided it remains in compliance with the Compact. Unless MCC agrees otherwise in writing, the Government shall fund all necessary costs of environmental and social mitigation measures (including, without limitation, costs of resettlement) not specifically provided for, or that exceed the amount of MCC Funding or the Government Contribution specifically allocated for such costs, in the Detailed Financial Plan for any Project or Activity.
Environmental and Social Performance. According to MCC Environmental Guidelines, this Activity is considered to be a “Category B” project, as minor environmental impacts may occur. Appropriate environmental and social assessment and mitigation measures and proper due diligence will be implemented in accordance with MCC Environmental Guidelines in order to ensure that these programs are well designed and will not result in adverse environmental health and safety impacts. Proposed investments should be assessed in broad terms to ensure that technical and environmental supporting infrastructure is in place for the investments, such as sufficient structural capacity and adequate electrical, gas, water supply and sanitation facilities. Based on the assessments, participating universities and Government agencies, as necessary, will develop and implement an environmental and social operations manual to ensure use of best practices regarding waste management, emergency preparedness, and occupational health and safety.
Environmental and Social Performance. Unless MCC and the Government agree otherwise in writing, the Government will ensure that all Projects and Activities undertaken, funded or otherwise supported in whole or in part (directly or indirectly) by MCC Funding under the Compact comply with the MCC Environmental Guidelines, including the IFC Performance Standards that have been incorporated by reference into the MCC Environmental Guidelines. The Government also will ensure that the Projects and Activities comply with all national environmental laws and regulations, licenses and permits, except to the extent such compliance would be inconsistent with the Compact. Unless MCC agrees otherwise in writing, the Government will fund all necessary costs of environmental and social mitigation measures (including, without limitation, costs of resettlement) not specifically provided for, or that exceed the MCC Funding specifically allocated for such costs in, the Detailed Financial Plan for any Project or Activity.
Environmental and Social Performance. In accordance with the MCC Environmental Guidelines, the Downstream Xxxxx Activity is categorized as a “Category A” activity in accordance with MCC Environmental Guidelines because it has the potential to have significant adverse environmental and social impacts that are sensitive and diverse, and may affect an area broader than the sites or facilities subject to physical works. The Wastewater Recycling Activity is categorized as a “Category B” activity because potential environmental and social impacts are generally site-specific, few if any of them are irreversible, and mitigation measures are more readily available. The Water Sector Sustainability Activity is categorized as a “Category C” activity because it is unlikely to have adverse environmental and social impacts.
Environmental and Social Performance. Unless MCC and the Government agree otherwise in writing, the Government will ensure that all Projects and Activities undertaken, funded or otherwise supported in whole or in part (directly or indirectly) b... (iv)
Environmental and Social Performance. All of the Projects will be implemented consistent with the MCC Environmental Guidelines, the International Finance Corporation Performance Standards on Environmental and Social Sustainability, the MCC Gender Policy, and Ghana’s laws, regulations, licenses, and permits. Where there is a difference between these standards, the stricter applies. In this context, the Government will: (a) develop, adopt, and implement an Environmental and Social Management System (“ESMS”) for MiDA and other Government agencies, as necessary, for all Compact Activities; (b) undertake, cooperate with or complete (as needed) necessary studies or plans including but not limited to Environmental and Social Impact Assessments (“ESIA”), Environmental and Social Management Plans (“ESMP”), environmental and social audits, Resettlement Policy Frameworks (“RPF”), and Resettlement Action Plans (“RAP”); (c) ensure that Project-specific ESMPs are developed and all relevant measures contained in such plans are integrated into project design and the applicable procurement documents and associated finalized contracts; and (d) implement appropriate environmental and social measures identified in such assessments or plans or developed to address environmental and social issues identified during compact implementation. All these actions will be completed in form and substance satisfactory to MCC. Unless MCC agrees otherwise in writing, the Government will fund all necessary costs of environmental and social mitigation measures (including, without limitation, costs of resettlement) not specifically provided for, or that exceed the MCC Funding specifically allocated for such costs in the Multi-Year Financial Plan.
Environmental and Social Performance. According to MCC Environmental Guidelines, the ECG Financial and Operational Turnaround Project is likely to be considered a “Category B” project. The most likely environmental impacts arising from the ECG Financial and Operational Turnaround Project are (i) risks to worker health and safety in the construction and operation of distribution infrastructure and (ii) risks to community health and safety from construction and operation of distribution infrastructure. The social impacts that may be the most important are (i) involuntary resettlement (including economic or physical displacement, temporary or permanent) along rights of way for distribution lines or in the acquisition of new or expanded sites for bulk supply points or substations, and (ii) removal of unauthorized connections causing loss of access to electricity by paying customers with illegal connections. A Framework Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (“FESIA”) and an Environmental and Social Management Framework (“ESMF”) have been developed as part of the 609(g) Agreement to address the overall environmental and social issues associated with the rehabilitation of the distribution system; identify, screen and assess key risks; and propose appropriate measures to manage such risks and impacts. The ESMF focuses on qualitative impacts and general rules, regulations, and management and mitigation measures rather than on quantifying the impacts of site-specific interventions. In addition to the FESIA and ESMF, site specific ESIAs and/or ESMPs will be developed (as needed) when the precise project locations become known in order to assess and mitigate risks specific to those sites. A RPF has been undertaken as part of the 609(g) Agreement to lay the groundwork for later development of region and site-specific RAP to be developed under the Compact.
Environmental and Social Performance. According to MCC Environmental Guidelines, the NEDCo Financial and Operational Turnaround Project is likely to be considered a “Category B” project. The most likely environmental and social risks arising from the NEDCo distribution turnaround Project are the same as those identified for the ECG Project and, as such, the same mitigation measures and documentation requirements described in paragraph 1(c) of Part B of this Annex I apply.
