Employer’s subjective evaluation Sample Clauses

Employer’s subjective evaluation. The Employer shall evaluate all candidates for promotion based upon their past job performance, experience and education. The Employer will assign a point score from a minimum of zero (0) to a maximum of twenty (20) points based upon his subjective review and evaluation. The Employer shall send the subjective evaluation to the Human Resources Department prior to reviewing the written examination of a candidate. A score of ten (10) points will be considered a satisfactory evaluation. A score of below ten (10) points will only be given in instances of a review considered by the Employer to be below the standard of satisfactory. Any applicant receiving such a below satisfactory review may, by written request to the Employer or his designated representative, receive in writing the reasons for such review. Such below satisfactory review evaluations by the Employer are subject to the grievance procedure. However, if the grievance is taken to arbitration, the arbitrator shall only have the authority to change the decision of the Employer if it is demonstrated that the Employer has not reviewed the candidate's past job performance, experience, and education in a fair and impartial manner or that the Employer's evaluation was arbitrary, capricious, done in bad faith, and/or for discriminatory purposes.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Employer’s subjective evaluation. The Employer shall evaluate all candidates for promotion based upon their past job performance, experience, qualifications and education. The Employer will assign a point score of from a minimum of zero (0), to a maximum of twenty (20) points based upon his subjective review and evaluation. Such score will be sent to the Human Resources Department prior to the Employer having knowledge of an applicant’s written examination result. A score of ten (10) points will be considered a satisfactory evaluation. A score of below ten (10) points will only be given in instances of a review considered by the Employer to be below the standard of satisfactory. Any applicant receiving such a below satisfactory review may, by written request to the Employer or his designated representative, receive in writing the reasons for such review. Such below satisfactory review evaluations by the Employer are subject to the grievance procedure. However, if the grievance is taken to arbitration, the arbitrator shall only have the authority to change the decision of the Employer if it is demonstrated that the Employer has not reviewed the candidate’s past job performance, experience, qualifications and education in a fair and impartial manner or that the Employer’s evaluation was arbitrary, capricious, done in bad faith, and/or for discriminatory purposes. Each candidate’s total point score will be determined by the total of points earned in Sections 11.1 (a) (b), and (c). Each candidate shall, upon written request of the Employer or his designated representative, be entitled to review all scores he received under this section. With the exception of review by a candidate of his own score, all evaluations under this Agreement are to be kept strictly confidential. No candidate will be allowed to review any other candidate’s evaluation. All employees promoted under the provisions of this Agreement shall serve a probationary period of six (6) months in their new job classification from the effective date of such promotion. The Employer may extend this probationary period for an additional period not to exceed three (3) months. The Employer may revoke the promotion of such employees who do not in his discretion satisfactorily complete this probationary period; however, such a decision on the part of the Employer is subject to an independent arbitrator’s review under the provisions of Article 6 as described in this Agreement. The arbitrator must find that the Employer had sufficient reason ...

Related to Employer’s subjective evaluation

  • EMPLOYEE EVALUATION 14.1 The purpose of employee evaluation is to support decisions concerning employee discipline, promotion and improvement. Evaluation shall be the responsibility of the immediate supervisor who shall not be a member of the bargaining unit.

  • EMPLOYEE EVALUATIONS 3. Any matter for which there is recourse under State or Federal statutes.

  • Performance Evaluations 34.1. The Contractor is subject to an annual performance evaluation to be conducted by NYCDOT pursuant to the PPB Rules.

  • Job Evaluation The work of the provincial job evaluation steering committee (the JE Committee) will continue during the term of this Framework Agreement. The objectives of the JE Committee are as follows: • Review the results of the phase one and phase two pilots and outcomes of the committee work. Address any anomalies identified with the JE tool, process, or benchmarks. • Rate the provincial benchmarks and create a job hierarchy for the provincial benchmarks. • Gather data from all school districts and match existing job descriptions to the provincial benchmarks. • Identify the job hierarchy for local job descriptions for all school districts. • Compare the local job hierarchy to the benchmark-matched hierarchy. • Develop a methodology to convert points to pay bands - The confirmed method must be supported by current compensation best practices. • Identify training requirements to support implementation of the JE plan and develop training resources as required. Once the objectives outlined above are completed, the JE Committee will mutually determine whether a local, regional or provincial approach to the steps outlined above is appropriate. It is recognized that the work of the committee is technical, complicated, lengthy and onerous. To accomplish the objectives, the parties agree that existing JE funds can be accessed by the JE committee to engage consultant(s) to complete this work. It is further recognized that this process does not impact the established management right of employers to determine local job requirements and job descriptions nor does this process alter any existing collective agreement rights or established practices. When the JE plan is ready to be implemented, and if an amendment to an existing collective agreement is required, the JE Committee will work with the local School District and Local Union to make recommendations for implementation. Any recommendations will also be provided to the Provincial Labour Management Committee (PLMC). As mutually agreed by the provincial parties and the JE Committee, the disbursement of available JE funds shall be retroactive to January 2, 2020. The committee will utilize available funds to provide 50% of the wage differential for the position falling the furthest below the wage rate established by the provincial JE process and will continue this process until all JE fund monies at the time have been disbursed. The committee will follow compensation best practices to avoid problems such as inversion. The committee will report out to the provincial parties regularly during the term of the Framework Agreement. Should any concerns arise during the work of the committee they will be referred to the PLMC. Create a maintenance program to support ongoing implementation of the JE plan at a local, regional or provincial level. The maintenance program will include a process for addressing the wage rates of incumbents in positions which are impacted by implementation of the JE plan. The provincial parties confirm that $4,419,859 of ongoing annual funds will be used to implement the Job Evaluation Plan. Effective July 1, 2022, there will be a one-time pause of the annual $4,419,859 JE funding. This amount has been allocated to the local table bargaining money. The annual funding will recommence July 1, 2023.

  • EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Purpose: To provide the policy and procedures for assessing employee performance and communicating the results of assessment to the employee and to others using assessment information in personnel decisions, and further to express the mutual commitment of the parties to the University’s values.

  • Employee Performance Evaluations Any employee performance evaluation shall be prepared by the employee's supervisor who has the responsibility and authority to prepare such reports. Employee performance evaluation reports shall be discussed with the employee prior to finalization of each category of the report. An employee will receive an appointment with his/her department's reviewing officer to discuss the evaluation by signing the evaluation form in the space provided. Each department shall make a reasonable effort to ensure that the reviewing officer for this purpose has not been a party to the preparation of the evaluation. In no case shall the reviewing officer sign the evaluation form until a review has occurred. Any regular or special evaluation with a rating of "unsatisfactory" shall include plans for employee development. Except in cases of termination, release from probation, or leave of absence, employees who receive an unsatisfactory performance evaluation must receive a follow-up evaluation. The follow-up evaluation shall cover a period of time no greater than ninety (90) calendar days from the date of the final review of the initial unsatisfactory evaluation. An employee shall have the right to submit written comments regarding any evaluation and to have such comments included in his/her personnel file along with the evaluation.

  • Performance Evaluation The Department may conduct a performance evaluation of Contractor’s Services, including Contractor’s Subcontractors. Results of any evaluation may be made available to Contractor upon request.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.