ELA PROFICIENCY Sample Clauses

ELA PROFICIENCY. Proficiency Rate: The PCSC will use the proficiency rates as determined by the Idaho Accountability Framework and reported via the Idaho Report Card. Math and ELA Proficiency Rubric Exceeds Standard The school’s proficiency rate is greater than one standard deviation above the mean of the identified comparison group, or the school’s proficiency average is in 90th percentile of all Idaho schools. Meets Standard The school’s proficiency rate is equal to the mean or falls between the mean and one standard deviation above the mean of the identified comparison group. Approaches Standard The school’s proficiency rate falls between the mean and one standard deviation below the mean of the identified comparison group. Does Not Meet Standard The school’s proficiency rate is more than one standard deviation below the mean of the identified comparison group, OR the school has been identified for comprehensive or targeted support for three consecutive years as per the Idaho Consolidated Plan.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (18)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
ELA PROFICIENCY. Proficiency Rate: The PCSC will use the proficiency rates as determined by the Idaho Accountability Framework and reported via the Idaho Report Card. Math and ELA Proficiency Rubric Exceeds Standard The school’s proficiency rate is greater than one standard deviation above the mean of the identified comparison group, or the school’s proficiency average is in 90th percentile of all Idaho schools. Meets Standard The school’s proficiency rate is equal to the mean or falls between the mean and one standard deviation above the mean of the identified comparison group. Approaches Standard The school’s proficiency rate falls between the mean and one standard deviation below the mean of the identified comparison group. Does Not Meet Standard The school’s proficiency rate is more than one standard deviation below the mean of the identified comparison group, OR the school has been identified for comprehensive or targeted support for three consecutive years as per the Idaho Consolidated Plan. Growth Rubric Math Exceeds Standard The percentage of students in grades 3-8 who did not achieve proficiency on the current year’s assessment but who did make adequate growth toward proficiency is greater than one standard deviation above the mean of the identified comparison group, OR the school’s growth rate is in the 90th percentile of all Idaho public schools. Meets Standard The percentage of students in grades 3-8 who did not achieve proficiency on the current year’s assessment but who did make adequate growth toward proficiency is equal to the mean or falls between the mean and one standard deviation above the mean of the identified comparison group, OR the growth rate increased by at least 10% over the previous year. Approaches Standard The percentage of students in grades 3-8 who did not achieve proficiency on the current year’s assessment but who did make adequate growth toward proficiency falls between the mean and one standard deviation below the mean of the identified comparison group. Does Not Meet Standard The percentage of students in grades 3-8 who did not achieve proficiency on the current year’s assessment made adequate growth toward proficiency is more than one standard deviation below the mean of the identified comparison group. Growth Rubric ELA Exceeds Standard The percentage of students in grades 3-8 who did not achieve proficiency on the current year’s assessment but who did make adequate growth toward proficiency is greater than one standard deviation abo...
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (14)

Related to ELA PROFICIENCY

  • Limited English Proficiency The Grantee must comply with the Department of Justice Guidance pertaining to title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000d. Grantee must take reasonable steps to provide meaningful access to their program(s) and activities for persons with limited English proficiency (LEP). For information on the civil right responsibilities, see xxxx://xxx.xxx.xxx.

  • Elements Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement Proficient Exemplary IV-A-1. Reflective Practice Demonstrates limited reflection on practice and/or use of insights gained to improve practice. May reflect on the effectiveness of lessons/ units and interactions with students but not with colleagues and/or rarely uses insights to improve practice. Regularly reflects on the effectiveness of lessons, units, and interactions with students, both individually and with colleagues, and uses insights gained to improve practice and student learning. Regularly reflects on the effectiveness of lessons, units, and interactions with students, both individually and with colleagues; and uses and shares with colleagues, insights gained to improve practice and student learning. Is able to model this element.

  • Subprojects 1. The Borrower shall make Grants to Beneficiaries (Small Farmers, Municipalities and Organizations) for Subprojects (Farmers’ Business Initiatives, Infrastructure Subprojects and Environmental Subprojects) in accordance with eligibility criteria and procedures acceptable to the Bank as further detailed in the Project Operational Manual.

  • Excellent Above Average Satisfactory Needs Improvement Unsatisfactory 5 4 3 2 1 5. The instructor demonstrates knowledge of the subject matter.

  • Performance Improvement Process 9.5.1 The purpose of the Performance Improvement Process is to remedy or mitigate the impact of a Performance Factor. The Performance Improvement Process may include: a requirement that the Hospital develop an Improvement Plan; or an amendment of the Hospital’s obligations as mutually agreed by the parties.

  • Performance Testing 7.2.1 The Design-Builder shall direct and supervise the tests and, if necessary, the retests of the Plant using Design-Builder’s supervisory personnel and the Air Emissions Tester shall conduct the air emissions test, in each case, in accordance with the testing procedures set forth in Exhibit A (the “Performance Tests”), to demonstrate, at a minimum, compliance with the Performance Guarantee Criteria. Owner is responsible for obtaining Air Emissions Tester and for ensuring Air Emissions Tester’s timely performance. Design-Builder shall cooperate with the Air Emissions Tester to facilitate performance of all air emissions tests. Design-Builder shall not be held responsible for the actions of Owner’s employees and third parties involved in the Performance Testing, including but not limited to Air Emissions Tester.

  • PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES 8 A. CONTRACTOR shall achieve performance objectives, tracking and reporting Performance 9 Outcome Objective statistics in monthly programmatic reports, as appropriate. ADMINISTRATOR 10 recognizes that alterations may be necessary to the following services to meet the objectives, and,

  • CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE AUDIT The Contractor shall allow the Authorized User to assess Contractor’s performance by providing any materials requested in the Authorized User Agreement (e.g., page load times, response times, uptime, and fail over time). The Authorized User may perform this Contractor performance audit with a third party at its discretion, at the Authorized User’s expense. The Contractor shall perform an independent audit of its Data Centers, at least annually, at Contractor expense. The Contractor will provide a data owner facing audit report upon request by the Authorized User. The Contractor shall identify any confidential, trade secret, or proprietary information in accordance with Appendix B, Section 9(a), Confidential/Trade Secret Materials.

  • Project/Milestones Taxpayer develops and manufactures various products for use in the defense, aerospace and security industries. In consideration for the Credit, Taxpayer agrees to expand its operations at various locations throughout California, including El Segundo, Redondo Beach, Palmdale, Sunnyvale, Woodland Hills, Azusa and Rancho Xxxxxxxx. As part of its expansion, Taxpayer will invest in manufacturing equipment, computer and electrical equipment and make tenant improvements to the above facilities. Additionally, Taxpayer will hire full-time employees as part of its expansion (collectively, the “Project”). Further, Taxpayer agrees to satisfy the milestones as described in Exhibit “A” (“Milestones”) and must maintain Milestones for a minimum of three (3) taxable years thereafter. In the event Taxpayer employs more than the number of Full- time employees, determined on an annual full-time equivalent basis, than required in Exhibit A, for purposes of satisfying the “Minimum Annual Salary of California Full-time Employees Hired” and the “Cumulative Average Annual Salary of California Full-time Employees Hired,” Taxpayer may use the salaries of any of the Full-time employees hired and retained within the required time period. For purposes of calculating the “Minimum Annual Salary of California Full-time Employees Hired” and the “Cumulative Average Annual Salary of California Full-time Employees Hired,” the salary of any full-time employee that is not employed by the taxpayer for the entire taxable year shall be annualized. In addition, Xxxxxxxx agrees that any full-time employee hired after the effective date of this agreement that is a “qualified full-time employee” (as defined in RTC section 23636) shall be excluded from the calculation of the net increase of full-time employees required by this Agreement if Taxpayer claims the credit allowed by RTC section 23636.

  • Constructability Review Prepare detailed interdisciplinary constructability review within Fourteen (14) days of receipt of the plans from the District that:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.