Documenting the Governance Structure Sample Clauses

Documenting the Governance Structure. The governance structure and business model of the initiative is documented in a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), which all members should be expected to sign upon joining. A short environmental scan will reveal a number of shared print MOUs viewable online, so rather than reinventing the wheel, initiatives can use existing agreements as a starting place. Xxxxx (2014) has an excellent series of articles in the Against the Grain column “Curating Collective Collections” on the process of producing a shared print MOU. A list of MOUs for shared print programs can be found on the author Xxx Xxxxx’ website6. MOUs typically include the following elements: ● Program description ● Eligibility and participate member types ● Governance and operations model ● Selection and identification of retained materials ● Duration of retention commitment ● Ownership and maintenance of retained materials 5 xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx/mscs/about/people/technical-services-subcommittee/ 6 xxxx://xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/List-of-MOUs-updated-3March2014.pdf ● Access to the retained materials ● Business model and financial obligations ● Withdrawal of members from participation ● Amendment and review of MOU
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Documenting the Governance Structure

  • Project Governance (a) If advised in writing by the Ministry the Recipient will:

  • Governance Structure The Academy shall be organized and administered as a Michigan nonprofit corporation under the direction of the Academy Board and pursuant to the governance structure as set forth in the Bylaws. The Academy’s Board of Directors shall meet monthly unless another schedule is mutually agreed upon by the President and the Academy. The Academy shall not delegate this duty of organization and administration of the Academy without the express affirmative consent of the University.

  • Shared Governance The parties shall develop a variety of shared governance models which schools may consider. Schools shall select a model that best suits their needs or the staff may develop an alternative model of governance with direct involvement by teachers, other staff and community representatives. Staff approval and commitment to the model is essential. The selected model of governance will be specifically described in each school's improvement plan.

  • Governance (a) The HSP represents, warrants and covenants that it has established, and will maintain for the period during which this Agreement is in effect, policies and procedures:

  • Contract Governance Any contract made or entered into by the TIPS is subject to and is to be governed by Section 271.151 et seq, Tex Lo Code. Otherwise, TIPS does not waive its governmental immunities from suit or liability except to the extent expressly by other applicable laws in clear and unambiguous language. Yes, I Agree (Yes) 9

  • Corporate Governance Ultimus shall provide the following services to the Trust and its Funds:

  • GOVERNANCE ARRANGEMENTS Enforceability of the Agreement

  • Integration and severability This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings (whether written or oral) between the Parties. The provisions of this Agreement are severable, and in the event any provisions of this Agreement shall be determined to be invalid or unenforceable under any controlling body of law, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not in any way affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining provisions hereof.

  • Audit of Existing Content and Functionality By May 1, 2017, the District will propose for OCR’s review and approval the identity and bona fides of an Auditor (corporation or individual) to audit all content and functionality on its website, including, but not limited to, the home page, all subordinate pages, and intranet pages and sites, to identify any online content or functionality that is inaccessible to persons with disabilities, including online content and functionality developed by, maintained by, or offered through a third party vendor or an open source. The Auditor will have sufficient knowledge and experience in website accessibility for people with disabilities to carry out all related tasks, including developing a Proposed Corrective Action Plan. The Audit will use the Benchmarks for Measuring Accessibility set out above, unless the District receives prior permission from OCR to use a different standard as a benchmark. During the Audit, the District will also seek input from members of the public with disabilities, including parents, students, employees, and others associated with the District, and other persons knowledgeable about website accessibility, regarding the accessibility of its online content and functionality.

  • Governance and Anticorruption 14. The Borrower, the Project Executing Agency, and the implementing agencies shall (a) comply with ADB’s Anticorruption Policy (1998, as amended to date) and acknowledge that ADB reserves the right to investigate directly, or through its agents, any alleged corrupt, fraudulent, collusive or coercive practice relating to the Project; and

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.