Disputing Inconsistencies Sample Clauses

Disputing Inconsistencies. The disputing Party or Parties may petition FERC for rehearing, file an appeal with the USFS pursuant to 36 C.F.R. § 251.80, request a stay or extension, or seek judicial review of any FERC or USFS condition or omission of any Proposed License Surrender Condition or Proposed SUA Condition, that results in a Material Modification of the Settlement Agreement. The Parties shall follow the dispute resolution process set forth in Section 9 of this Settlement Agreement while any such rehearing, appeal or request for stay or extension is pursued. Any disputing Party or Parties may ask FERC, USFS or the court to defer action on the merits of any rehearing request or appeal while dispute resolution is pursued. If all Parties subsequently agree to modify this Settlement Agreement to conform to the inconsistent action, the disputing Party or Parties shall withdraw or dismiss any administrative or judicial action, or recommend such withdrawal or dismissal, as appropriate.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Disputing Inconsistencies. The disputing Party or Parties may petition FERC for rehearing or seek judicial review of any New License article, or omission of any Proposed License Article, that results in a Material Modification of the Settlement Agreement. The Parties shall follow the dispute resolution process set forth in Section 9 of this Settlement Agreement while any such rehearing, appeal or request for stay or extension is pursued. Any disputing Party or Parties may ask FERC or the court to defer action on the merits of any rehearing request or appeal while dispute resolution is pursued. If all Parties subsequently agree to modify this Settlement Agreement to conform to the inconsistent action, the disputing Party or Parties shall withdraw or dismiss any administrative or judicial action, or recommend such withdrawal or dismissal, as appropriate.
Disputing Inconsistencies. The Disputing Party may, in addition, if they have intervened i n the FERC relicensing proceeding, petition FERC for rehearing or seek judicial review of any New Project License article, or omission of any PM&E measure stated in Appendix A, that is Inconsistent with this Settlement Agreement. If any Party or non-party seeks rehearing or judicial review, the Licensee may seek a stay or an extension of time of the New Project License or other order. The Parties shall follow the dispute resolution process while any such rehearing, appeal or request for stay or extension is pursued. Any Disputing Party may ask FERC or the court to defer action on the merits of any rehearing request or appeal while dispute resolution is pursued. If a Party has filed for administrative rehearing or judicial review and the Parties subsequently agree to modify this Settlement Agreement to conform to the inconsistent action, the filing Party or Parties shall withdraw the appeal or recommend such withdrawal as appropriate.

Related to Disputing Inconsistencies

  • Inconsistencies To the extent of any inconsistencies between the terms and conditions of this Amendment and the terms and conditions of the Loan Agreement, the terms and conditions of this Amendment shall prevail. All terms and conditions of the Loan Agreement not inconsistent herewith shall remain in full force and effect and are hereby ratified and confirmed by Borrowers.

  • ADJUSTMENT OF DISPUTES 37.01 (1) The Employer and the Union recognize that grievances may arise in each of the following circumstances:

  • Irreconcilable Differences The Couple recognizes the possibility of unhappy differences that may arise between them. Therefore, this Agreement shall take precedence over any Federal, State, or local guidelines or standards for Divorce.

  • Performance while Dispute is Pending Notwithstanding the existence of a dispute, the Supplier must continue without delay to carry out all of its responsibilities under the Contract that are not affected by the dispute. If the Supplier fails to continue without delay to perform its responsibilities under the Contract, in the accomplishment of all undisputed work, the Supplier will bear any additional costs incurred by Sourcewell and/or its Participating Entities as a result of such failure to proceed.

  • Corrections to Factual Inaccuracies In the event that the LEA determines that the Provider is maintaining Student Data that contains a factual inaccuracy, and Provider cooperation is required in order to make a correction, the LEA shall notify the Provider of the factual inaccuracy and the correction to be made. No later than 90 calendar days after receiving the notice of the factual inaccuracy, the Provider shall correct the factual inaccuracy and shall provide written confirmation of the correction to the LEA.

  • Attachments, inconsistencies and severability This Consortium Agreement consists of this core text and Attachment 1 (Background included) Attachment 2 (Accession document) Attachment 3 (List of Third Parties for simplified transfer according to Section 8.2.2) Attachment 4 (Identified Affiliated Entities) In case the terms of this Consortium Agreement are in conflict with the terms of the Grant Agreement, the terms of the latter shall prevail. In case of conflicts between the attachments and the core text of this Consortium Agreement, the latter shall prevail. Should any provision of this Consortium Agreement become invalid, illegal or unenforceable, it shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of this Consortium Agreement. In such a case, the Parties concerned shall be entitled to request that a valid and practicable provision be negotiated which fulfils the purpose of the original provision.

  • Discrepancies in References In the event of a discrepancy between the model number referenced in the Bid Specifications and the written description of the Products which cannot be reconciled, with respect to such discrepancy, then the written description shall prevail.

  • Inconsistency In the event of any inconsistency between the provisions of the Schedule and the other provisions of this Master Agreement, the Schedule will prevail. In the event of any inconsistency between the provisions of any Confirmation and this Master Agreement (including the Schedule), such Confirmation will prevail for the purpose of the relevant Transaction.

  • Resolving Disputes The Company and the customer will use all reasonable endeavours to resolve any dispute between them. If they cannot resolve their dispute between them, they will:-

  • Investment disputes 1. Any dispute between an investor of one Contracting Party and the other Contracting party in connection with an investment in the territory of the other Contracting Party shall, as far as possible, be settled amicably through negotiations between the parties to the dispute. The party intending to resolve such dispute through negotiations shall give written notice to the other of its intention.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.