DIRECT AWARD CRITERIA Sample Clauses

DIRECT AWARD CRITERIA. 2.1 Where the Contracting Body can only differentiate the Service Offers that meet the Statement of Requirements on the basis of price, the following Direct Award Criteria shall be applied: Criteria Number Award Criteria Percentage Weightings 1 Price 100% 2 Non Price Elements (including quality, technical merit and delivery lead times) 0%
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
DIRECT AWARD CRITERIA. 1. Contracting Bodies who wish to directly award a Call-Off Agreement under the Framework Agreement must follow the procedure as set out below and more widely, the process set out in Regulation 19 of the Regulations. The Contracting Body shall:
Sample 1Sample 2
DIRECT AWARD CRITERIA. The following criteria and weightings shall be applied to the catalogue of services for all Services Framework Service Providers capable of meeting the Contracting Body’s Statement of Requirements during the Direct Ordering Procedure. SoR Headline Criteria SoR Section Contributors Applied To Weighting % [A] General Capability Geographic Coverage (fatal) High Level Organisation Staff Acquiring and Maintaining Public Sector Knowledge Environmental Management Minimum Order Value NB: Full UK national service is a mandatory requirement Each answer you provide for SoR Section A 40% [B] Customer Requirements Further Competition Support Other Pre-Sales Support Complaint Policies and Procedures Customer Satisfaction Surveys Operational Security Procedures The answer you provide for SoR Section B 10% [D] Capability/Capacity – Lot Specific Case Studies Contract Terminations Each answer you provide for SoR Section D 10% [E] Pricing Pricing Each answer you provide for SoR Section E 30% [F] Framework Agreement Acceptance and Completion Undertaking Framework Completion Each answer you provide for SoR Section E, within the Lots you tender for 10% Part 2
Sample 1
DIRECT AWARD CRITERIA. The Direct Award process shall follow the procedure set out in this paragraph 3 (Direct Award Procedure).
Sample 1
DIRECT AWARD CRITERIA. The following evaluation criteria shall be applied to the Framework Suppliers’ compliant tenders submitted through direct award. Criteria Number Criteria 1 Whole life cost: cost effectiveness; price and running costs 2 Technical merit & functional fit: coverage, network capacity and performance as specified in relevant service levels 3 After sales service management: help desk, account management function and assurance of supply of a range of devices and good value accessories
Sample 1
DIRECT AWARD CRITERIA. The Following Criteria And Weightings Shall Be Applied To The Framework Suppliers' Compliant Tenders Submitted Through Direct Award. Subject to the provisions of Framework Schedule 4 (Order Form & Call Off Terms), a Contracting Body may directly award a Call-Off Agreement on the basis of the most economically advantageous tender (“MEAT”). The Contracting Body must: Develop a clear Statement of Requirements setting out its requirements for the Services. Confirm that the Statement of Requirements can be met by the Framework Agreement Supplier’s Services as set out in Call Off Agreement Schedule 2 (Services). Determine that all of the terms of the Framework Agreement and the Call-Off Terms do not require amendment or any supplementary terms and conditions. To assist a Contracting Body in identifying the Most Economically Advantageous Tender (MEAT), the following evaluation criteria should be used to assess the information provided within the Call Off Agreement Schedule 2 (Services) and Call Off Agreement Schedule 3 (Contract Charges, Payment & Invoicing): Evaluation Criteria Criteria Weighting Range % Quality 70% (the Contracting Body can modified the variance level to meet their requirements i.e. -/+ 10%) Prices and Charging Structure 30% (the Contracting Body can modified the variance level to meet their requirements i.e. -/+ 10%)
Sample 1
DIRECT AWARD CRITERIA. The Approved List covers 8 Categories. In determining an Approved Provider to Direct Award to, ESCC / the relevant ASE Partner shall take into account the following criteria:
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
DIRECT AWARD CRITERIA. The following criteria and weightings shall be applied to the catalogue of services for all Services Framework Service Providers capable of meeting the Contracting Body’s Statement of Requirements during the Direct Ordering Procedure. Criterion Number Criterion Percentage Weightings (or rank order of importance where applicable) 1 Quality & Coverage 15% 2 Customer Requirements 10% 3 Quality of Case Study 20%
Sample 1

Related to DIRECT AWARD CRITERIA

  • Award Criteria 40.1 The Procuring Entity shall award the Contract to the successful tenderer whose tender has been determined to be the Lowest Evaluated Tender in accordance with procedures in Section 3: Evaluation and Qualification Criteria.

  • Direct Award 11.1. The framework public body should issue their complete brief in accordance with schedule 5 (Standard Terms of Supply) ensuring that the contractor is made aware that the requirement is a call-off under the framework and forward to the first ranked contractor for consideration. The contractor should review the brief and submit a short proposal along with pricing to the framework public body. The ranking positions are detailed in the table below.

  • Performance Criteria The Performance Criteria are set forth in Exhibit A to this Agreement.

  • Performance Goals A. The Trust and State Street have developed mutually acceptable performance goals dated March 1, 2011 , and as may be amended from time to time, regarding the manner in which they expect to deliver and receive the services under this Agreement (hereinafter referred to as “Service Level Agreement”). The parties agree that such Service Level Agreement reflects performance goals and any failure to perform in accordance with the provisions thereof shall not be considered a breach of contract that gives rise to contractual or other remedies. It is the intention of the parties that the sole remedy for failure to perform in accordance with the provisions of the Service Level Agreement, or any dispute relating to performance goals set forth in the Service Level Agreement, will be a meeting of the parties to resolve the failure pursuant to the consultation procedure described in Sections V. B. and V.C. below. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties hereby acknowledge that any party’s failure (or lack thereof) to meet the provisions of the Service Level Agreement, while not in and of itself a breach of contract giving rise to contractual or other remedies, may factor into the Trust’s reasonably determined belief regarding the standard of care exercised by State Street hereunder.

  • Selection Criteria for Awarding Task Order The Government will award to the offeror whose proposal is deemed most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment using the evaluation criteria. The Government will evaluate proposals against established selection criteria specified in the task order RFP. Generally, the Government's award decision will be based on selection criteria which addresses past performance, technical acceptability, proposal risk and cost. Among other sources, evaluation of past performance may be based on past performance assessments provided by TO Program Managers on individual task orders performed throughout the life of the contract. The order of importance for the factors will be identified in the RFP for the specified task order.

  • PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES 4.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) sets out-

  • System for Award Management (XXX) Requirement Alongside a signed copy of this Agreement, Grantee will provide Florida Housing with a XXX.xxx proof of registration and Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) number. Grantee will continue to maintain an active XXX registration with current information at all times during which it has an active award under this Agreement.

  • Performance Measures The System Agency will monitor the Grantee’s performance of the requirements in Attachment A and compliance with the Contract’s terms and conditions.

  • System for Award Management (XXX) XXX.gov)

  • Performance Levels (a) The Performance Levels which apply to the performance by the respective Parties of their obligations under this Agreement are set out in Part 1 of Schedule 5. A failure by either Party to achieve the relevant Performance Level will not constitute a breach of this Agreement and the only consequences of such failure as between the Parties shall be the consequences set out in this Clause 5.6.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.