Detailed Description of the Project. Provide a detailed description of the scope of the proposed project, including, at a minimum, the type and planned use of real and tangible personal property, the nature of the business, a timeline for property construction or installation, and any other relevant information. Brazos Fork Solar, LLC (Brazos Fork) is requesting an appraised value limitation from Xxxxxxx Consolidated Independent School District (CISD) for the Brazos Fork Project (the “Project”), a proposed solar powered electric generating facility in Xxxxxxx County. The proposed Xxxxxxx CISD Project (this application) will be constructed within the Brazos Fork Reinvestment Zone, estimated to be approximately 12,260 acres, that was created by Xxxxxxx County on November 24th, 2020. A map showing the location of the project is included in TAB 11. The proposed Project is anticipated to have a capacity of approximately 300 MW located in Xxxxxxx CISD. The exact number and location of panels and inverters will vary depending upon ongoing siting analysis, manufacturer’s availability, prices, and the final megawatt generating capacity of the Project when completed. Current estimated plans are to install approximately 850,164 PV modules and 87 inverters with all improvements located in Xxxxxxx CISD. The Applicant requests a value limitation for all facilities and equipment installed for the Project, including; solar modules/panels, tracking equipment, racking and mounting structures, O&M building, substation, inverters boxes, combiner boxes, meteorological equipment, foundations, roadways, paving, fencing, collection system, generation transmission lines, interconnection facilities and all necessary equipment for commercial generation of electricity. Full construction of the Project is anticipated to begin in June of 2022 with completion by December 31, 2023. *NOTE: The map in TAB 11 shows the potential locations of improvements within Xxxxxxx CISD boundaries; however, the final number of panels and inverters and the location of each of these facilities is dependent upon ongoing negotiations with power purchasers and other factors. ATTACHMENT TO APPLICATION FOR APPRAISED VALUE LIMITATION ON QUALIFIED PROPERTY BY BRAZOS FORK SOLAR, LLC TO XXXXXXX CISD Schedule A1: Total Investment for Economic Impact (through the Qualifying Time Period) 1510-haskellcisd-brazosforksolar-amendment002 Date 4/1/2021 Applicant Name Brazos Fork Solar, LLC Form 50-296A ISD Name Xxxxxxx CISD Revised February 2020 PROPERTY INVE...
Detailed Description of the Project. A. Summary of the Project Sanitary landfilling is the dominant method of solid waste disposal in the United States, accounting for about 217 million tons of waste annually (U.S. EPA, 1997). The annual production of municipal solid waste in the United States has more than doubled since 1960. In spite of increasing rates of reuse and recycling, population and economic growth will continue to render landfilling as an important and necessary component of solid waste management. In a Bioreactor Landfill, controlled quantities of liquid are added, and circulated through waste as appropriate, to accelerate the natural biodegradation and composting of solid and liquid waste components. This process significantly increases the biodegradation rate of waste and thus decreases the waste stabilization and composting time (5 to 10 years) relative to what would occur within a conventional landfill (30 years, to 50 years or more). If the waste decomposes (i. e., is composted) in the absence of oxygen (anaerobically), it produces landfill gas (biogas). Biogas is primarily a mixture of methane, a potent greenhouse gas, carbon dioxide, and VOC's, which are local air pollutants. Methane is also a fuel. This by-product of landfill waste decomposition (composting) can be a substantial renewable energy resource that can be recovered for electricity or other uses. Other benefits of a Bioreactor Landfill composting operation include increased landfill waste settlement and therefore increase in landfill capacity and life, improved opportunities for treatment of leachate liquid that may drain from fractions of the waste, possible reduction of landfill post-closure efforts required, landfill mining, and abatement of greenhouse gases through highly efficient methane capture over a much shorter period of time than is typical of waste management through conventional landfilling.
Detailed Description of the Project. 9 A. Description of the Specific Project Elements 10 1. Model General Permit 10 2. EMS Program 11
Detailed Description of the Project. A. Summary of the Project The EPA Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances (OPPTS) has developed a set of computerized risk screening tools, which have the potential to significantly advance EPA’s pollution prevention objectives by allowing companies to calculate or estimate important risk-related properties based on an analysis of chemical structure. OPPTS uses these tools in the P2 framework to evaluate new chemicals when test data are lacking. OPPTS is also making the tools in the P2 framework available to industry, and demonstrating how they can help design safer chemicals, reduce waste generation, and identify other P2 opportunities. Kodak will pilot the application of and the dissemination of information about the P2 Framework under this Project XL Agreement, as described below.
Detailed Description of the Project. A. Description of the Specific Project Elements There are two major elements of this project the model NPDES general permit and the EMS program, including 3rd party audits, that each facility will need to conform to before applying for an NPDES general permit. Another important component of this Project is an expanded industry education and training program that UEP will implement. The expanded industry education and training program is designed to assist individual egg producers develop effective EMSs, effectively manage nutrients, and effective management of litter generated by UEP facilities by 3rd party users.
Detailed Description of the Project. A. What is the P2 Framework? The Agency encourages chemical manufacturers to incorporate health and environmental considerations into product decision making during the development of new chemical substances. EPA has several ongoing initiatives intended to help Stakeholders better assess risk issues during the early stages of product development efforts. Examples include the Design for Environment Program, the Green Chemistry Program, and the P2 Framework, among other programs. Of specific relevance to this Agreement is the P2 Framework as utilized in the development of safer new chemical substances described in PMNs submitted pursuant to Section 5 of TSCA. The P2 Framework is an approach to risk screening that incorporates pollution prevention principles in the design and development of chemical substances. The objective of the P2 Framework approach is to inform decision making at early stages of development and promote the selection and application of safer chemical substances and processes. This approach is implemented by means of a set of computer models that predict risk-related properties of chemical substances using structure activity relationships (SARs), exposure assessment tools and models, and standard (default) scenarios. These models have been developed over a 20-year period by EPA's OPPTS to screen new chemical substances in the absence of data. Annually, EPA evaluates more than 2,000 new chemical substances submitted pursuant to Section 5 of TSCA. TSCA requires that EPA evaluate the chemical substances within 90 days; however, the law does not require that the PMN submitter conduct laboratory tests to evaluate potential hazard and/or risk of the chemical substances. Operating under this time limitation, and often a lack of data, EPA has developed methods to quickly screen chemical substances in the absence of data. The P2 Framework Models listed in Appendix A - P2 Framework Models, reflect the expertise of multiple EPA scientists, grantees, support contractors, as well as others in the scientific community, working for more than 20 years screening chemical substances in the absence of data. The P2 Framework Project presents these 18 models to industry with the hope that the models will be useful in identifying potential problem chemical substances and processes early in the R&D process. The table also provides information regarding the availability of the models. The P2 Framework, as currently constructed, does not address all biological end...
Detailed Description of the Project. A detailed description should be provided in Arial font-12 and written in the space below (not more than 2 pages). It should be clearly explaining the scope of works and activities of both partners (Indonesian and her/his foreign partner researcher). The summary should contain a brief explanation of: 1. Introduction; 2. Objectives; 3. Implementation; 4. Middle to long term Expected impacts; 5. Outputs/Deliverable (joint publications, products, patents, etc); 6. Other benefits (i.e. capacity building, socio- economic benefits) Names and affiliations of other researchers/students to participate in the project (add rows where required) Full name Current Academic Qualification Institution Signatures (All copies submitted should contain the original signature of the submitting Principal Investigator, that of his/her Head of Department as well as the Research Authorising Officer of his/her institution. Principal Investigator Name: Position: Signature: Date: Department Name: Department Head Name: Signature: Date: Research Authorising Officer Name: Signature: Date:
Detailed Description of the Project. A. Summary of the Project The Gold Track tier will offer the greatest operational/regulatory flexibilities and require the greatest environmental commitments from participants in the NJDEP’s Silver and Gold Track Program. For Gold Track participation, regulated entities will be required to meet set core eligibility requirements above and beyond those required for Silver Track and Silver Track II. These eligibility requirements are explained in detail below. Gold Track will be conducted initially as a pilot program and will be limited to no more than nine participants. The additional requirements for Gold Track participation include: establishment and implementation of an environmental management system and community outreach program prior to acceptance into Gold Track, and a willingness to commit to further specific environmental actions that are commensurate to the flexibilities granted for each media, as appropriate. These environmental actions are described in the attached media- specific Addenda. Participating facilities will negotiate covenants with NJDEP following their acceptance into Gold Track. These covenants, while of no legal effect and not enforceable, will reflect the commitments made by the Gold Track participants and the concomitant flexibilites offered by the Department. The Department recognizes that certain regulatory changes may be necessary to authorize it to enter into these covenants. The Department also recognizes that existing permits may have to be modified to carry out the terms of the covenants. Regulatory changes will be accomplished through the rulemaking process governed by N.J.S.A 52:14B-1 et seq.; permit modifications will be made in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. See Section III. G, below. Regulatory changes and permit modifications must be consistent with applicable federal and state law.
Detailed Description of the Project. Provide a detailed description of the scope of the proposed project, including, at a minimum, the type and planned use of real and tangible personal property, the nature of the business, a timeline for property construction or installation, and any other relevant information. Sunshine Hill Solar, LLC is requesting an Appraised Value Limitation from Electra Independent School District for the Sunshine Hill Solar, LLC Project (the “Project”), a proposed solar powered electric generating facility in Wichita County. The proposed Electra ISD Project (this Application) would be constructed within a Reinvestment Zone that will be created by Wichita County. A map showing the location of the project is included in Tab 11. The project is also known by the name Xxxxxxxx Xxxx. The Project IGNR Number is 22INR0269 and was assigned on January 6, 2020. This application covers all qualified property in the reinvestment zone and project boundary within Electra ISD necessary for commercial operations. The proposed Project is anticipated to have a total capacity of 500 MW ac, all of which will be located in Electra ISD. Solar equipment selection is ongoing at this time and has not been finalized. The exact number of PV panels and their capacity will depend upon the panels and inverters selected, manufacturers availability and prices, ongoing engineering design optimization and the final megawatt generating capacity of the Project when completed. Current plans are to install approximately 1,515,000 PV panel and 146 solar inverters within Electra ISD. The Applicant requests a Value Limitation for all materials and equipment installed for the Project, including collection systems, transmission lines, electrical interconnections, roads, control systems necessary for commercial generation of electricity, solar modules/panels, foundations, racking and mounting structures, inverters boxes, combiner boxes, meteorological equipment, roadways, maintenance and operations building, paving, fencing, electrical substations, generation transmission tie line and associated towers, and interconnection facilities. Construction of the Project is anticipated to begin in November 2021 with completion by December 2022. TAB 5 Documentation to assist in determining if limitation is a determining factor. With origins dating back to 1985, EDF Renewables has a presence worldwide having built 16 GW of operating projects with an additional 1,000MW of renewable energy projects currently under constructio...
Detailed Description of the Project. 2.1 Summary of the Project OMP proposes to achieve environmental performance superior to currently available practices through the use of a bench-scale high temperature catalytic oxidation (HTCO ) process which destroys the RCRA hazardous waste component of the LLMW and traps the remaining low-level radioactive material on-site, all within the same NRC-regulated laboratory in which the material is generated. Following the application of the catalytic oxidation process, one of two types of treatment residue remains. When the sample had used tritium as the radioisotope tracer, the remaining low- level radioactive material is trapped in the form of low-level radioactive water utilizing cryogenic traps to condense the emissions from the process. When carbon-14 is used as the radioisotope tracer, the remaining low-level radioactive material is in the form of low-level carbon dioxide, which is then passed through a 45% potassium hydroxide solution and converted to potassium carbonate solution. According to OMP, the HTCO process has proven to be extremely effective in treating a broad range of organic solvents and has routinely achieved destruction removal efficiencies (DRE ) of 99.999 to 99.99999%. A more detailed description of the elements of the process is discussed in Section 2.2 below. See Appendix A for a Simplified Schematic of the High Temperature Catalytic Oxidation Process. See Appendix B for a list of hazardous organic components and the corresponding DRE achieved by the oxidation process.
