Designing Student Assessments Sample Clauses

Designing Student Assessments. Unsatisfactory Basic Proficient Distinguished Assessment procedures are not congruent with instructional outcomes; the proposed approach contains no criteria or standards. Teacher has no plan to incorporate formative assessment in the lesson or unit nor any plan to use assessment results in designing future instruction. Some of the instructional outcomes are assessed through the proposed approach, but others are not. Assessment criteria and standards have been developed, but they are not clear. Approach to the use of formative assessment is rudimentary, including only some of the instructional outcomes. Teacher intends to use assessment results to plan for future instruction for the class as a whole. Teacher’s plan for student assessment is aligned with the instructional outcomes; assessment methodologies may have been adapted for groups of students. Assessment criteria and standards are clear. Teacher has a well- developed strategy for using formative assessment and has designed particular approaches to be used. Teacher intends to use assessment results to plan for future instruction for groups of students. Teacher’s plan for student assessment is fully aligned with the instructional outcomes and has clear criteria and standards that show evidence of student contribution to their development. Assessment methodologies have been adapted for individual students, as needed. The approach to using formative assessment is well designed and includes student as well as teacher use of the assessment information. Teacher intends to use assessment results to plan future instruction for individual students. Critical Attributes Assessments do not match instructional outcomes. Assessments have no criteria. No formative assessments have been designed. Assessment results do not affect future plans. Only some of the instructional outcomes are addressed in the planned assessments. Assessment criteria are vague. Plans refer to the use of formative assessments, but they are not fully developed. Assessment results are used to design lesson plans for the whole class, not individual students. All the learning outcomes have a method for assessment. Assessment types match learning expectations. Plans indicate modified assessments for some students as needed. Assessment criteria are clearly written. Plans include formative assessments to use during instruction. Lesson plans indicate possible adjustments based on formative assessment data. In addition to the characteristics of “prof...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Designing Student Assessments. Unsatisfactory Basic Proficient Distinguished Assessment procedures are not congruent with instructional outcomes; the proposed approach contains no criteria or standards. Teacher has no plan to incorporate formative assessment in the lesson or unit nor any plan to use assessment results in designing future instruction. Some of the instructional outcomes are assessed through the proposed approach, but others are not. Assessment criteria and standards have been developed, but they are not clear. Approach to the use of formative assessment is rudimentary, including only some of the instructional outcomes. Teacher intends to use assessment results to plan for future instruction for the class as a whole. Teacher’s plan for student assessment is aligned with the instructional outcomes; assessment methodologies may have been adapted for groups of students. Assessment criteria and standards are clear. Teacher has a well- developed strategy for using formative assessment and has designed particular approaches to be used. Teacher intends to use assessment results to plan for future instruction for groups of students. Teacher’s plan for student assessment is fully aligned with the instructional outcomes and has clear criteria and standards that show evidence of student contribution to their development. Assessment methodologies have been adapted for individual students, as needed. The approach to using formative assessment is well designed and includes student as well as teacher use of the assessment information. Teacher intends to use assessment results to plan future instruction for individual students.
Designing Student Assessments. Please describe how you will assess students in the following manners:
Designing Student Assessments. Component 1f Assessment/Criteria for Success How will you and your students know if they have successfully met the outcomes? List both summative and formative assessments. What specific criteria will be met in a successful product/process? Attach rubrics/assessments/products as appropriate. A Framework for Teaching Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx 2011
Designing Student Assessments. (For example: What will demonstrate that the students have learned? How is this aligned with instructional outcomes in content and process? Will the assessment be adaptedfor individual students? How will assessment results inform future instruction fo r individual students?) Teacher’s Notes Supervisor’s Notes Indian River Central School District Annual Professional Performance Review Teacher Improvement Plan (TIP) Name School/Building Initial Conference Date / / Tenured:_Yes_No Probationary Period: (From) / / (To) / / Observation Date / / Evaluation Conference Date / / TIP Timeline: (From) / / (To) / / Team Members: Areas for Improvement: Identify specific areas in need of improvement. Develop specific behaviorally written goals for the teacher to accomplish during the period of the TIP. Expected Outcomes: Identify specific recommendations for what the teacher is expected to do to improve in the identified areas. Delineate specific, realistic and achievable activities for the teacher. Resources: Identify specific resources and support systems available to assist the teacher to improve performance. Responsibilities: Identify responsibilities and steps to be taken by team members throughout the TIP. Evidence of Achievement: Identify how progress will be measured and assessed. Specify next steps to be taken based upon whether the teacher is successful, partially successful or unsuccessful in efforts to improve performance. Next Scheduled Observation / / Teacher’s Signature: Date: / / Supervisor’s Signature: Date: / / Teacher Improvement Plan Chart Area to be Improved Objectives for Improvement Self­ Improvement Plan Supervisor/ Team Plan to Assist Teacher Improvement Measurement Criteria Plan Evaluation Timeline Teacher’s Signature: Date:
Designing Student Assessments. Component 1f Assessment/Criteria for Success How will you and your students know if they have successfully met the outcomes? List both summative and formative assessments. What specific criteria will be met in a successful product/process? Attach rubrics/assessments/products as appropriate. A­1 Optional A Framework for Teaching Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx 2011 (Click here to view rubric) POST OBSERVATION CONVERSATION GUIDELINES The following are guiding questions for the post observation conference. The conference/conversation should be held within 5 school days of the observation.

Related to Designing Student Assessments

  • Risk Assessments a. Risk Assessment - Transfer Agent shall, at least annually, perform risk assessments that are designed to identify material threats (both internal and external) against Fund Data, the likelihood of those threats occurring and the impact of those threats upon the Transfer Agent organization to evaluate and analyze the appropriate level of information security safeguards (“Risk Assessments”).

  • Ergonomic Assessments ‌ At the request of the employee, the Employer will ensure that an ergonomic assessment of the employee’s work station is completed by a person trained to conduct ergonomic assessments. Solutions to identified issues/concerns will be implemented within available resources.

  • Association Assessments Current regular Association assessments and dues (Association Assessments) paid in 578 advance will be credited to Seller at Closing. Cash reserves held out of the regular Association Assessments for deferred 579 maintenance by the Association will not be credited to Seller except as may be otherwise provided by the Governing Documents. 580 Buyer acknowledges that Buyer may be obligated to pay the Association, at Closing, an amount for reserves or working capital. 581 Any special assessment assessed prior to Closing Date (§ 3) by the Association will be the obligation of Buyer Seller. 582 Except however, any special assessment by the Association for improvements that have been installed as of the date of Buyer’s 583 signature hereon, whether assessed prior to or after Closing, will be the obligation of Seller. Seller represents that the Association 584 Assessments are currently payable at approximately $ per and that there are no unpaid regular 585 or special assessments against the Property except the current regular assessments and . Such 586 assessments are subject to change as provided in the Governing Documents. Seller agrees to promptly request the Association to 587 deliver to Buyer before Closing Date (§ 3) a current Status Letter.

  • Environmental Assessment and Mitigation Development of a transportation project must comply with applicable environmental laws. The party named in article 1, Responsible Parties, under AGREEMENT is responsible for the following:

  • Real Estate Taxes and Assessments Xxxxx is aware that all property is subject to the possibility of reassessment which may result in increased real estate taxes.

  • Self-Assessment (a) Subject to clause 4.4(b), for Services that are Self-Assessable:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.