Designation of Lead Jurisdiction Sample Clauses

Designation of Lead Jurisdiction. There will be a lead jurisdiction for processing a claim that is filed with and against members for alleged damages and injuries that occur as a result of TNET activities. The lead jurisdiction shall be the jurisdiction within which the action subject to the claim occurred; PROVIDED, that if the jurisdiction within which the action subject to the claim occurred did not participate in the action subject to the claim, the lead jurisdiction shall be the jurisdiction within which the TNET investigation or response originated. If a jurisdiction that was not involved in the action subject to the claim receives the claim, that jurisdiction shall notify the other jurisdictions in accordance with Section XVI of this Agreement and shall use its best efforts to determine who the appropriate lead jurisdiction is. Nothing in this Agreement waives or is intended to change any claim reporting responsibility that any entity has to its insurance carrier or risk pool.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Designation of Lead Jurisdiction. There shall be a lead jurisdiction for processing any claim filed with a Signatory Agency for alleged damages/injuries that occur as a result of TRT activities. The lead jurisdiction shall be the jurisdiction that served as the Primarily Responsible Agency for the incident during which the action subject to the claim took place. If the claim involves acts/omissions that did not occur during a TRT call out, the lead jurisdiction shall be the jurisdiction that employs the individuals whose actions/omissions serve as the basis for the claim. If allegations are made against more than one Signatory Agency, or the employees of more than one Signatory Agency, the OC shall determine the lead jurisdiction for a claim by majority vote.
Sample 1

Related to Designation of Lead Jurisdiction

  • Governing Law; Jurisdiction; Venue This Agreement and all acts and transactions hereunder and all rights and obligations of Silicon and Borrower shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. As a material part of the consideration to Silicon to enter into this Agreement, Borrower (i) agrees that all actions and proceedings relating directly or indirectly to this Agreement shall, at Silicon's option, be litigated in courts located within California, and that the exclusive venue therefor shall be Santa Xxxxx County; (ii) consents to the jurisdiction and venue of any such court and consents to service of process in any such action or proceeding by personal delivery or any other method permitted by law; and (iii) waives any and all rights Borrower may have to object to the jurisdiction of any such court, or to transfer or change the venue of any such action or proceeding.

  • Governing Law; Venue and Jurisdiction THIS DPA WILL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF THE LEA, WITHOUT REGARD TO CONFLICTS OF LAW PRINCIPLES. EACH PARTY CONSENTS AND SUBMITS TO THE SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION TO THE STATE AND FEDERAL COURTS FOR THE COUNTY OF THE LEA FOR ANY DISPUTE ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS DPA OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED HEREBY.

  • Law, Jurisdiction, Venue, Waiver of Jury Trial This Agreement shall be interpreted and construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of Florida. All parties acknowledge and accept that jurisdiction of any controversies or legal problems arising out of this Agreement, and any action involving the enforcement or interpretation of any rights hereunder, shall be exclusively in the state courts of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County, Florida, and venue for litigation arising out of this Agreement shall be exclusively in such state courts, forsaking any other jurisdiction which either party may claim by virtue of its residency or other jurisdictional device. BY ENTERING INTO THIS AGREEMENT, PURCHASER AND COUNTY HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVE ANY RIGHTS EITHER PARTY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY OF ANY CIVIL LITIGATION RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT. IF A PARTY FAILS TO WITHDRAW A REQUEST FOR A JURY TRIAL IN A LAWSUIT ARISING OUT OF THIS AGREEMENT AFTER WRITTEN NOTICE BY THE OTHER PARTY OF VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION, THE PARTY MAKING THE REQUEST FOR JURY TRIAL SHALL BE LIABLE FOR THE REASONABLE ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS OF THE OTHER PARTY IN CONTESTING THE REQUEST FOR JURY TRIAL, AND SUCH AMOUNTS SHALL BE AWARDED BY THE COURT IN ADJUDICATING THE MOTION.

  • LAW & JURISDICTION This Call-Off Agreement and/or any non-contractual obligations or matters arising out of or in connection with it, shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the Laws of England and Wales and without prejudice to the dispute resolution procedures set out in Clause CO-14 or CO-19 (Dispute Resolution) each Party agrees to submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales and for all disputes to be conducted within England and Wales.

  • Venue and Jurisdiction Any claim, action, suit or proceeding between Agency (or any other agency or department of the State of Oregon) and Contractor that arises from or relates to this Contract must be brought and conducted solely and exclusively within the Circuit Court of Xxxxxx County for the State of Oregon. CONTRACTOR, BY EXECUTION OF THIS CONTRACT, HEREBY CONSENTS TO THE IN PERSONAM JURISDICTION OF SAID COURTS. In no event may this section be construed as (i) a waiver by the State of Oregon of any form of defense or immunity, whether it is sovereign immunity, governmental immunity, immunity based on the Eleventh Amendment to the Constitution of the United States or otherwise, from any claim, action, suit or proceeding, or (ii) consent by the State of Oregon to the jurisdiction of any court.

  • APPLICABLE LAW, FORUM, VENUE AND JURISDICTION (a) This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of Delaware, without regard to the principles of conflicts of law.

  • Governing Law Jurisdiction Etc (a) GOVERNING LAW. THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAW OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

  • Governing Laws and Jurisdiction This Agreement shall be deemed to have been executed and to be performed within the State of California and shall be construed and governed by the internal laws of the State of California. Any legal proceedings arising out of or relating to this Agreement shall be brought in Sacramento County, California.

  • Governing Law; Jurisdiction This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York (without regard to conflicts of laws principles), and the obligations, rights and remedies of the parties hereunder shall be determined in accordance with such laws.

  • RECOGNITION AND JURISDICTION The Employer recognizes the Union as the sole and exclusive collective bargaining agent for all employees who are engaged in the receiving, cutting, grinding, slicing, curing, displaying, preparing, processing, seal­ ing, wrapping, bagging, pricing, prefabricating and selling of all meat products, sausage, poultry, rabbits, fish and seafood products, canned hams, bacon, pork loins and picnics, whether such products are fresh, frozen, chilled, cooked, cured, smoked or barbecued, including those employees operating equipment used in wrapping, cubing, tenderizing of such meat products and who perform their duties in all areas where such products are prepared, displayed and offered for retail sale in service or self-service cases located in retail markets that are presently owned, leased^ arv^-diled, operated or supervised by the Employer during the period of this Agreement. All services as indicated above shall be performed by employees covered <b y . this Agreement. The aforesaid shall not preclude the Employer from purchasing and selling fresh prepack­ aged, case-ready, unpriced, chill-pack whole, cut-up, and parts of chickens. The foregoing provision is not intended and will not be interpreted to prevent Employer from follow­ ing practices in or out of its stores which have been followed in the past by a store covered by a Greater Kansas City Retail Meat Cutters Contract, which ex­ pired October 3, 1965, and it is not intended by this provision to prevent the Employer from cutting, pack­ aging or otherwise handling meat at a central point in Greater Kansas City if the work previously per­ formed at the Employer’s store would be performed by members of the Union under a contract stipulating the rates provided for in this contract with hours and working conditions tailored to fit the operation. It shall not be required to price merchandise which has a UPC label only or which has a UPC label and has been pre-priced with a price stated in dollars and cents by a supplier or manufacturer in stores equipped with scanners. Meat merchandisers and meat supervisors may handle the product when working along with a meat cutter for the purpose of training and supervision within store.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.