Design Recommendations Sample Clauses

Design Recommendations. The CM shall make recommendations to the Owner and Designer with respect to constructability, construction cost, sequence of construction, construction duration, possible means and methods of construction, time for construction, and separation of the Project contracts for various categories of Work. In addition, the CM shall give to the Designer all data of which it is aware concerning patents or copyrights for inclusion in the Contract Documents.
View SourceView Similar (7)
Design Recommendations. Consider the impacts of transient encampments on urban roadsides with regard to functional design solutions, visual surveillance, and maintenance regimes. • Consider the long-term ecological and biological impact of plant species and spacing choices to ensure the functional, operational, environmental, and visual goals---such as quick canopy coverage and rapid cover of the ground. • When design functions permit, plant trees, as these are the best performing plant material over time. Where functional and aesthetic conditions permit, specify shrub communities under trees. • Continue to research and specify low- and densely growing ground cover plants that establish quickly, compete with invasive weeds, withstand drought conditions, and tolerate periodic mowing. • Ensure that construction contractors and maintenance crews understand and strictly abide by plant installation “planting windows” and effective herbicide application times.
View Source
Design Recommendations. Shall include a description of the project; a site description; geologic conditions; a summary of field explorations, laboratory testing and design recommendations.
View Source
Design Recommendations. The compromise proposed by Central Highlands of a 35-foot building setback and a 25-foot vegetative buffer along SR 305 is in compliance with both the BIMC and the Design for Bainbridge Manual, and is accepted by the City. The proposed traffic flow through adjacent commercial parking lots, which is allowed by the BIMC and consistent with the Visconsi Master Plan, is deemed acceptable by the City. If Central Highlands corrects the remaining five deficiencies noted on the recommendations page of the Design for Bainbridge Worksheet dated June 21, 2021, then the Project will satisfy the 23 Design Standards in the Design for Bainbridge Manual.
View Source
Design Recommendations. 4.5.1 General design principles‌ The visualization concepts were discussed in the two focus groups with the purpose of under- standing user needs as well as eliciting general design principles for music visualizations in a symphonic concert setting. In this section we summarize the tentative design principles that were derived from the focus group discussions. Fig. 12 summarises this information. An important element for future studies is the surprise factor. Participants in focus group 2 have demonstrated the need to be surprised during the music: (fg2#6, “I voted this the worst. It is related with what I said before, as a musician, sometimes I don’t want to see what comes next. It’s kind of spoiling a movie. Well, sometimes I would like to. But this does not give much information”, structure). However, on the other hand they expressed a need to get an overview of what is coming up (fg2#4, “It would be better if you can see what comes next, because expectation makes you to get catched”). For this participant, engagement is a function of his awareness of what comes next. In that case, there is a risk of a spoiler effect, as argued by fg2#6. A trade-off between attracting attention towards specific elements in the piece versus over- stimulation was identified, for which timing seems to play a major role: (fg#6, “It doesn’t tell to what you need to pay attention. You can see that the kettledrum goes wild, but not a second in advance”, “Look what’s about to happen”, orchestra layout), (fg#7, “There is only one thing there, so that’s what you start to pay attention to. It’s the pink elephant effect”, reduced piano roll).‌
View Source
Design Recommendations. The results of the data review, the Consultant’s discussions with the Authority’s personnel, site observations and data from the subsurface explorations will be used to develop a theory regarding the pipeline settlement. The Consultant will prepare a brief report to the Authority describing our opinion on the settlement cause(s) and with recommendations for installing the by-pass piping to avoid the settlement issue. The Consultant shall submit report and conceptual design recommendations to the Authority and meet to discuss the report and recommendations. After this meeting, the Consultant will adjust the recommendations to incorporate the Authority’s comments. The Consultant will then work with the Authority to incorporate the final installation recommendations into the by-pass piping plans and specifications.
View Source

Related to Design Recommendations

  • Board Recommendation The Acquiror Company Board, by unanimous written consent, has determined that this Agreement and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement are advisable and in the best interests of the Acquiror Company’s stockholders and has duly authorized this Agreement and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

  • Company Board Recommendation (a) Subject to the terms of Section 6.3(b) and Section 6.3(c), the Company Board shall recommend that the holders of Company Shares accept the Offer, tender their Company Shares to Acquisition Sub pursuant to the Offer and, if required by the applicable provisions of Delaware Law, adopt this Agreement (the “Company Board Recommendation”). (b) Neither the Company Board nor any committee thereof shall (i) fail to make the Company Board Recommendation to the holders of the Company Shares, (ii) withhold, withdraw, amend or modify in a manner adverse to Parent, or publicly propose to withhold, withdraw, amend or modify in a manner adverse to Parent, the Company Board Recommendation, (iii) adopt, approve, recommend, endorse or otherwise declare advisable the adoption of any Acquisition Proposal (it being understood that, only with respect to a tender offer or exchange offer, taking a neutral position or no position (other than in a communication made in compliance with Rule 14d-9(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act) with respect to any Acquisition Proposal shall be considered a breach of this clause (iii)), or (iv) resolve, agree or publicly propose to take any such actions (each such foregoing action or failure to act in clauses (i) through (iv) being referred to herein as an “Company Board Recommendation Change”). Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything to the contrary set forth in this Agreement, if, at any time prior to the Appointment Time, the Company Board receives a Superior Proposal or there occurs an Intervening Event, the Company Board may effect a Company Board Recommendation Change provided that (i) the Company Board determines in good faith (after consultation with outside legal counsel) that the failure to effect a Company Board Recommendation Change would reasonably be expected to be a breach of its fiduciary duties to the Company Stockholders under applicable Delaware Law, and in the case of a Superior Proposal, the Company Board approves or recommends such Superior Proposal; (ii) the Company has notified Parent in writing that it intends to effect a Company Board Recommendation Change, describing in reasonable detail the reasons, including the material terms and conditions of any such Superior Proposal and a copy of the final form of any related agreements or a description in reasonable detail of such Intervening Event, as the case may be, for such Company Board Recommendation Change (a “Recommendation Change Notice”) (it being understood that the Recommendation Change Notice shall not constitute a Company Board Recommendation Change for purposes of this Agreement); (iii) if requested by Parent, the Company shall have made its Representatives available to discuss and negotiate in good faith with Parent’s Representatives any proposed modifications to the terms and conditions of this Agreement during the three (3) Business Day period following delivery by the Company to Parent of such Recommendation Change Notice; and (iv) if Parent shall have delivered to the Company a written proposal capable of being accepted by the Company to alter the terms or conditions of this Agreement during such three (3) Business Day period, the Company Board shall have determined in good faith (after consultation with outside legal counsel), after considering the terms of such proposal by Parent, that a Company Board Recommendation Change is still necessary in light of such Superior Proposal or Intervening Event in order to comply with its fiduciary duties to the Company Stockholders under applicable Delaware Law. Any material amendment or modification to any Superior Proposal will be deemed to be a new Superior Proposal for purposes of this Section 6.3. The Company shall keep confidential any proposals made by Parent to revise the terms of this Agreement, other than in the event of any amendment to this Agreement and to the extent required to be disclosed in any Company SEC Reports. (c) Nothing in this Agreement shall prohibit the Company Board from (i) taking and disclosing to the Company Stockholders a position contemplated by Rule 14e-2(a) under the Exchange Act or complying with the provisions of Rule 14d-9 promulgated under the Exchange Act, and (ii) making any disclosure to the Company Stockholders that the Company Board determines in good faith (after consultation with its outside legal counsel) that the failure to make such disclosure would reasonably be expected to be a breach of its fiduciary duties to the Company Stockholders under applicable Delaware Law; provided, however, that in no event shall this Section 6.3(c) affect the obligations of the Company set forth in Sections 6.2 and 6.3; and provided, further, that any such disclosure will be deemed to be a Company Board Recommendation Change unless the Board of Directors publicly reaffirms the Company Board Recommendation within five Business Days of such disclosure.

  • Conclusions and Recommendations Based on our country-by-country analysis, 197 of the AEWA populations are already well-monitored both for population size and trend. Our prioritisation method allowed focusing on the AEWA conservation and management priorities (Priorities 1-2) and to consider cost effectiveness and feasibility (Priorities 3-6). Theoretically, the two- third target of the AEWA Strategic Plan can be just attained by focusing on the development of monitoring activities for Priority 1-5 populations (i.e. leaving out the 168 more widespread Priority 6 populations that would require more species-specific monitoring methods. Most of the Priority 1-5 populations would require improvement of the IWC though regional schemes focusing on the West Asian / East African flyway with possibly three subregional components in the Central Asia, Arabia and Eastern and Southern Africa. In the latter region, improvements in Tanzania and Mozambique are particularly important. In the Black Sea - Mediterranean - Sahelian flyway the focus should be primarily on the Sahel countries and especially on increasing the consistency of annual counts. The quality of monitoring is already better in the Black Sea and Mediterranean regions. In the East Atlantic, the ongoing capacity-building activities should continue and the consistency and representativity of site coverage should be further strengthened in most countries. Angola would require a major capacity improvement but primarily for the intra-African migrants on inland wetlands. It is also clear that the targets of the AEWA Strategic Plan cannot be achieved without complementing the IWC with periodic aerial surveys both in Western Africa as well as in Eastern and Southern Africa, by setting up a periodic offshore waterbird monitoring scheme in the Caspian Sea and by focusing in each country on a relatively small number of breeding bird species strategically selected in this report.

  • No Government Recommendation or Approval The Subscriber understands that no federal or state agency has passed upon or made any recommendation or endorsement of the offering of the Shares.

  • Design Changes Axon may make design changes to any Axon Device or Service without notifying Agency or making the same change to Axon Devices and Services previously purchased by Agency.