Description of Filing. The Agreement governs PacifiCorp’s construction of, and service from, a temporary tap line, which will run from PacifiCorp’s Morgan City substation to UAMPS member Morgan City’s new adjacent Island Road substation. Section 2 of the Agreement provides that the term of the agreement begins on the later of the date of execution or another date designated by the Commission. Section 3 of the Agreement provides that PacifiCorp, at its sole expense, shall: procure and install a tap line from the Xxxxx to Xxxxxx 46 kV line between switches 40A and 43A to the new A-frame structure located in the Island Road substation; interconnect the Project Facilities to PacifiCorp’s facilities to enable load service at the Island Road substation; and remove the Project Facilities upon completion and utilization of the new point of delivery. Under Section 4 of the Agreement, PacifiCorp agrees that it shall own and maintain the Project Facilities and shall be responsible for all costs incurred for the work under Section 3 of the agreement. The remaining commercial terms are provided in Sections 5 through 33 of the Agreement.
Description of Filing. To facilitate the fulfilment of MEC’s obligations as a Local Balancing Authority (“LBA”) operator, MEC requests entities that operate energy facilities located within the MEC LBA to enter into a LBA agreement. The RLBAA is required due to English Farms Wind Project, LLC executing a Generator Interconnection Agreement with MEC and the Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc. (“MISO”), for a wind farm to be engaged in the generation and sale of electric power and energy within the MEC LBA. IPL has subsequently acquired the rights, title and interest in this wind farm. The wind farm will be operated in coordination with the MISO Balancing Authority as a resource physically located in the MEC LBA area, but through dynamic metering/scheduling, effectively located in the Alliant West Local Balancing Authority (“ALTW LBA”) Area. The RLBAA outlines the framework for the coordination and communication of operational and metering information between MEC and IPL in support of MEC’s functions as the MEC LBA.
Description of Filing. PJM and PJMSettlement are submitting in this filing (i) a new Attachment HH to the PJM Tariff and a new Schedule 13 to the Operating Agreement, setting forth the rates, terms, and conditions of PJMSettlement’s jurisdictional sales, as “shared tariffs” through these attachments; (ii) a new Schedule 9-PJMSettlement setting forth in the form 8 September 3 Order at P 57. 9 Id. at P 60. 10 Id. at P 52. 11 Id. 12 Id. 13 Id. 14 September 3 Order at P 52 & n.82 citing Electronic Tariff Filings, Order No. 714, III FERC Stats. & Regs., Regs. Preambles ¶ 31,276, at PP 65-73 (2008), as amended October 23, 2009. of a shared tariff the break out of the administrative charges for PJMSettlement;
Description of Filing. In Order No. 888, the Commission explained that a transmission customer may request that the transmission provider effect a reassignment on the customer’s behalf.6 In this situation, the transmission provider “must immediately post the available capacity on its OASIS” and “must assure that any revenues associated with the reassignment are credited to the assignor.”7 In addition, the “assignor may request the transmission provider to provide the billing and payment services for the reassignment.”8 Consistent with this policy, the Agency Agreement describes APS Transmission’s agreement to effect reassignments on SCE’s behalf. For example, section 1 of the Agency Agreement provides that Edison “shall, through the APS OASIS, post for remarketing by APS Transmission to third parties the Remaining Rights and that “[e]ach assignment of the Remaining Rights shall take place through the APS OASIS and shall be subject to the terms and conditions of the [Resale] Tariff.” The Agency Agreement further provides that APS Transmission must use its best efforts to offer the Remaining Rights at rates that will maximize the revenues to SCE from the Remaining Rights. However, APS Transmission’s offer to reassign SCE’s capacity must meet the terms and conditions of the Resale Tariff, which cap the rate for reassignments of SCE’s capacity at the existing long-term firm point- to-point transmission rate under the APS Open Access Transmission Tariff (“OATT”).9 SCE’s existing service under the EATA may be curtailed to provide emergency service in accordance with the Edison-Navajo Transmission Agreement. As a result, as reflected in Sections 2 and 4 of the Agency Agreement, reassignments of SCE’s transmission capacity under the EATA must also be subject to this limitation. The Agency Agreement also reflects provisions of the Resale Tariff permitting continuation of service for assignees,10 stating that any SCE rollover rights shall be offered to customers taking assignments of the Remaining Rights for periods of five years or more.11
Description of Filing. Georgia Power Company is proposing to revise the project boundary by sale of approximately 7.948 acres that is adjacent to Lake Oliver to Xx. Xxxxxx Xxxx.
Description of Filing. On July 18, 2014, in Docket No. ER14-2462-000 PJM submitted for filing the Original OffshoreMW Agreements (“July 18 Filing”). PJM requested an effective date of June 17, 2014 for these agreements. In the July 18 Filing, PJM explained that the Original OffshoreMW Agreements did not conform to the form of ISA set forth in Attachment O to the PJM Tariff (“ISA Form”) and the form of CSA set forth in Attachment P to the PJM Tariff (“CSA Form”).3 Specifically, the Original OffshoreMW Agreements did not contain section A.iv regarding the reporting of meteorological data in Schedule H of the Original OffshoreMW ISA and Schedule N of the Original OffshoreMW CSA, which are identical. PJM explained that the Original OffshoreMW Agreements did not contain section A.iv because the agreements were tendered to OffshoreMW prior to the effective date of the PJM Tariff revisions adding section A.iv to Schedule H of the ISA Form and 2 Interconnection Service Agreement By and Among PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. And OffshoreMW, L.L.C. And Atlantic City Electric Company, designated as Original Service Agreement No. 3899 (“Original OffshoreMW ISA”) and Interconnection Construction Service Agreement By and Among PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. And OffshoreMW, L.L.C. And Atlantic City Electric Company, designated as Original Service Agreement No. 3900 (“Original OffshoreMW CSA”) (together, “Original OffshoreMW Agreements”).
Description of Filing. NorthWestern is constructing a new 115-kV switchyard to replace its current Aberdeen A-Tap switching station located west of Aberdeen, South Dakota. The new switchyard was originally intended to be configured as a three-breaker, three-bay, 115-kV ring bus. However, based on East River’s request, the new switchyard will be designed and constructed as a six-breaker, four- bay, 115-kV, breaker-and-a-half bus. Exhibit 1 to the Agreement sets forth the specifications and description of the project. NorthWestern will develop the detailed design package, procure the associated equipment and materials, and construct and energize the new Aberdeen A-Tap Switchyard. The costs associated with design and construction of the new switchyard, development of the detailed design package, construction oversight, and general planning will be shared between East River and NorthWestern, as shown in Exhibit 1. NorthWestern estimated East River’s share of the costs for the project to be $1,183,366 (Section 3.1 & Exhibit 1). These costs represent NorthWestern’s actual costs in providing the requested services. Accordingly, there is no profit component to this Agreement. NorthWestern has not invoiced East River or received any payment under this Agreement. NorthWestern plans to begin work on this project immediately in order to meet the Milestone Schedule outlined in Exhibit 2.
Description of Filing. The Construction Agreement authorizes PacifiCorp to proceed with all work associated with the design, engineering, and construction of facilities that are required to provide the point- to-point transmission service requested by Powerex. Powerex submitted a request to PacifiCorp to utilize 100 MW of point-to-point transmission service on PacifiCorp’s transmission system from BORA-REDB. In order to accommodate the request, PacifiCorp has determined that certain transmission facilities need to be constructed and/or upgraded, all of which constitute Network Upgrades with an estimated cost of approximately $63 million. Specifically, as further outlined in Exhibit B of the Construction Agreement, each of the Ben Lomond-El Monte 138 kV transmission line (circuit #1), the Goshen-Fish Creek-Grace 161 kV transmission line, and the Xxxxx-Xxxxxx- Treasureton 138kV transmission line will require the rebuilding of various structures and reconductoring of various conductor, and each of the Ben Lomond, El Monte, Treasureton, Oneida, Grace and Goshen Substations will require various upgrades for both electrical and protective equipment. (the “Construction Project”). PacifiCorp will perform all design, procurement, and installation work under the Construction Agreement. Powerex will provide financial security for the Construction Project in accordance with the financial security requirements of Section 19.4 of PacifiCorp’s OATT, which will be released in accordance with the Construction Agreement. The cost responsibility for the Construction Project will be borne by PacifiCorp as noted in Section 4.3, as all of the facilities to be constructed constitute Network Upgrades necessary for transmission service.
Description of Filing. A. Revised Operating Agreement, Schedule 12 PJM hereby submits for filing proposed revisions to the Operating Agreement, Schedule 12, which lists all the current PJM Members and includes updates to reflect (1) the addition of new PJM Members; (2) the removal of withdrawn PJM Members; and (3) PJM Members’ corporate name changes up to, and including, December 31, 2023 to the list of Members. Additionally, this filing includes ministerial clerical revisions to Operating Agreement, Schedule 12 to ensure that all members are listed in alphabetical order.
Description of Filing. Subsequent to the September 20 Filing, the parties to the Original AMP ISA and Original AMP CSA agreed to revise the agreements. Specifically, the parties agreed:
