Data Source. These data files are prepared by the MCP’s designated survey vendor using the MCP’s CAHPS survey data and sample frame file information.
Data Source. Once the user account is created, the Customer, via an Authorized User, must connect or upload a Data Source to the Collaborative Platform. By connecting / uploading its Data Source to the Collaborative Platform, the Customer undertakes that:
Data Source. Pharmacy Claims 1 Data Source: Member Enrollment 1 (may be several files) Historical File Load 10 years min Duration of Storage 5 years min Frequency of Refresh Monthly Number of User Roles Minimum two roles: Executive Level and Power User Original Term Renewal Term Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Start-up/Preparation and Implementation $ - Basic Annual Service/Subscription $ 388,798.00 $ 388,798.00 $ 388,798.00 $ 388,798.00 $ 388,798.00 $ 388,798.00 $ 388,798.00 $ 388,798.00 $ 388,798.00 $ 388,798.00 CMS MSP Submission $ 48,000.00 $ 48,000.00 $ 48,000.00 $ 48,000.00 $ 48,000.00 $ 48,000.00 $ 48,000.00 $ 48,000.00 $ 48,000.00 $ 48,000.00 Population Health Management Annual Review $ 4,200.00 $ 4,200.00 $ 4,200.00 $ 4,200.00 $ 4,200.00 $ 4,200.00 $ 4,200.00 $ 4,200.00 $ 4,200.00 $ 4,200.00 Total Annual Cost $ 440,998.00 $ 440,998.00 $ 440,998.00 $ 440,998.00 $ 440,998.00 $ 440,998.00 $ 440,998.00 $ 440,998.00 $ 440,998.00 $ 440,998.00 Number of Users 8 Original Term (Years 1-5) Total Renewal Term (Years 6-10) Total $ 2,204,990.00 $ 2,204,990.00 REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. Original Term Renewal Term Other than implementation or circumstances expressly provided for in the Statement of Work, specify any circumstances in which additional charges do not apply. Unit Unit Cost Unit Unit Cost Example each $ 50.00 each $ 50.00 Does not apply to the first 100 additional changes. Additional Data Integrations with New Partners each $ 12,000.00 each $ 12,000.00 Does not apply to the first 5 additional integrations. REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. EXHIBIT C PRIVACY, SECURITY, AND CONFIDENTIALITY BUSINESS ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT This Privacy, Security, and Confidentiality Business Associate Agreement (“Agreement”) is between the State of Florida Department of Management Services (“Agency”), and Xxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx, Inc., (“Business Associate”), (each individually, a “Party,” and collectively, the “Parties”), with an effective date of the last date of execution below.
Data Source an entity that handles the Customer information or a legitimate access thereto.
Data Source. Information Management Protecting Adults and Children in Texas (IMPACT); information used for the performance period: Facility (operation) as described in 40 TAC §745.37(3)(A)-(I), with an active Contract; Number of DFPS placements in the contracted Facility that were active at any point during the performance period; and Number of Designated Victims at the Facility for which a disposition of RTB was Upheld. Methodology: The numerator is the number of children who are/were in DFPS managing conservatorship, placed with the Contractor, and Designated Victims determined by a Residential Child-Care Licensing (RCCL) investigation, for which a disposition of RTB was Upheld during the performance period. The denominator is the total number of children in DFPS managing conservatorship placed with the Contractor during the performance period. Divide the numerator by the denominator. Subtract the result from one (1) to give the complimentary ‘children not Designated Victims’ measurement. Multiply by 100 and state as a percentage.
Data Source. HESA Performance Indicators Data Source: HESA Performance Indicators
Data Source. Agency does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of TWC Information. TWC Information includes data provided to Agency by third parties, including employers and employees.
Data Source. We examined data from the 2003-2014 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), conducted annually by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Administration (SAMHSA). NSDUH provides nationally representative data regarding illicit drug use on the civilian, non-institutionalized population. Detailed documentation of NSDUH sampling and data collection procedures are provided elsewhere (Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, 2016). In brief, NSDUH employs a multi-stage stratified probability sampling design. For this study, we combined data from adults (aged 18 and older) in the 2003-2014 public-use files in six 2-year time intervals. Response rates for NSDUH ranged from 82% to 91%, depending on the year. As secondary analyses of publicly available data, this study was exempted from Emory University’s IRB approval.
Data Source. A comprehensive literature review provided the information to address this evaluation question. Quantitative Results The research findings were based on these two evaluation questions which are follows:
Data Source. This evaluation question was addressed from information collected from key informant interviews and the anonymous survey. Is GHBS data being used by its data end users? Two of the four local HIV/AIDS organizations contacted agreed to participate in the survey. The organizations that participated were AID Atlanta and AID Gwinnett. AID Atlanta had a total of 91 staff members who received the survey and AID Gwinnett had a total of 25 staff members who received the survey. Thus, there were a total of 116 staff members that received the survey. The response rate for all staff members combined was 22.4% with 26 out of 116 staff members participating. Staff members who participated were asked a total of 19 questions (See Appendix C). SPSS was used to determine the frequency of the quantitative data collected. Results from the survey show that the data has been used by local HIV/AIDS organizations with 27.2% (3/11) of the respondents having used the data in the course of their work activities. Although the percentage rate concerning the use of GHBS data was relatively low (27.2%), the percentage rate concerning the awareness of the GHBS system was greater with 46.2% (12/26) respondents having heard of the GHBS system. The findings from this survey suggest that although HIV/AIDS organizations are aware of the data provided by the GHBS system, the percent of respondents who reported use of the data was low (27.2%). 80% (4/5) of those who reporting using GHBS for specific reasons, used GHBS data to provide health education, preventative techniques, and counseling to individuals infected with HIV/AIDS while 20% (1/5) of the same respondents used GHB data to provide health education to individuals infected with HIV/AIDS. As shown in figure 2, although there isn’t a substantial difference between respondents who are aware of the GHBS system and those who are not aware of the system, the response rate for those who were unaware of the system is greater than those who are aware of the system. Figure 3 shows that there is a substantial difference between those who are aware of the GHBS system and their actual of the GHBS data. Table 1 provides the descriptive statistics of responses collected from the knowledge based electronic survey. The number of individuals who responded to each question, percentage of the response rate, ratio of responses, and cumulative percent are shown in table 1. Awareness of GHBS System Series1 Figure 2- Response rate: Awareness of GHBS System 10...
