Current and Forecasted Traffic Sample Clauses

Current and Forecasted Traffic. The Design Hourly Volume (DHV) Total and the Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) is shown below in Table 1. TABLE 3 DESIGN DESIGNATION AND TRAFFIC INDEX (TI) Year 2017 Year 2035 Year 2045 Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) 6,500 7,826 8,190 Design Hour Volume (DHV) 810 933 1,000 Peak Hour Directional Vol % (NB/SB) 47.1/52.9 48.6/51.4 47.7/52.3 Truck Design Hourly Vol % (T) 11 11 11 Traffic Index (TI) 9 10 10.5 Design Speed (NB/SB) (mph) 55/30 55/30 55/30 *Northbound (NB), Southbound (SB), miles per hour (mph) TRUCKS IN ADT: 7.0% 10 YEAR TI: 8.5 DESIGN SPEED (V): 55 / 30 MPH 20 YEAR TI: 9.5 Collision Analysis The following Collision Rate Summary Table shown below shows actual and average collision rates within the project location for the three-year period from January 1, 2016 thru December 21, 2018. The ‘actual’ collision rate in this segment is lower than the state ‘average’ for this type of facility. There was 1 reported collision during this three-year period. This collision was a rear end accident near PM 50.5 resulting from an obstruction on the roadway. The data from the 3-year collision history indicate that the nonstandard side slopes did not contribute to any collisions. There is no recognizable or correctable trend when reviewing the 3yr collision history. Table 4 Collision Rate Summary for SB/SLO -1 PM 50.3/50.6, 0.0/0/3 Table B Dates: 01/01/2016 thru 12/31/2018 Location Actual Average Fatal Fatal + Injury Total Fatal Fatal + Injury Total SB/SLO SR 1 0.00 .31 0.31 0.022 0.51 1.10 * The numbers in the table are units of collisions per million vehicle miles
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Current and Forecasted Traffic. The current and forecasted traffic information for the project limits is shown below by segment. Ala-80 from PM R7.6 to CC-80 at Cutting Boulevard (PM 2.0): • Count Year (2020) average Daily Traffic (ADT) 237,300 • Construction Year (2022) ADT 238,200 • Design Year (2042) ADT 247,400 • Truck% 4.81% • 20-year Traffic Index (TI) 14.00 • 20-year Equivalent Single Axle Load (ESAL) 50,547,000 CC-80 from Cutting Boulevard (PM 2.0) to Hilltop Drive (PM 6.0): • Count Year (2020) ADT 258,600 • Construction Year (2022) ADT 260,100 • Design Year (2042) ADT 275,000 • Truck% 4.00% • 20-year TI 13.50 • 20-year ESAL) 43,862,000 CC-80 from Hilltop Drive (PM 6.0) to State Route (SR) 4 (PM 10.0) • Count Year (2020) ADT 245,000 • Construction Year (2022) ADT 246,500 • Design Year (2042) ADT 260,900 • Truck% 4.60% • 20-year TI 14.00 • 20-year ESAL 59,168,000 CC-80 from SR 4 (PM 10.0) to Xxxxxxxx (PM 13.5): • Count Year (2020) ADT 178,700 • Construction Year (2022) ADT 179,700 • Design Year (2042) ADT 189,900 • Truck% 4.37% 5.18% • 20-year TI 14.00 • 20-year ESAL 47,231,000 Collision Analysis Accident Data: All Collisions (Combined Eastbound and Westbound) As shown in the tables below, the accident information classified as “All” considers all collisions, combining data on collisions that occurred in both the westbound direction and the eastbound direction of the project mainline segments, exclusive of the I-80 ramps, in Alameda County from PM R7.60 to PM 8.036 and in Contra Costa County from PM 0.0 to PM 13.5.
Sample 1Sample 2
Current and Forecasted Traffic. ‌ The future travel forecasting was based on the assumption that the project location is a rural setting and planned land use in the area growth rate of 2.48% was used for forecasting purposes. Item Along SR 119 South Bound, SR 99 Off Ramp to SR 119 Construction Year ADT (2024) 20,500 10,400 Future ADT (2044) 33,500 17,000 Future Year ADT (2064) 54,500 28000 DHV (2044) 2,850 1500 DHV (2064) 4,650 2,400 T (%) (2044, 2064) 6% 5% D (%) (2044, 2064) 60% 100% 20 Year ESAL (2044) 10,120,000 8,320,000 20 Year TI (2044) 12 11.5 40 Year ESAL (2064) 28,150,000 23,210,000 40 Year TI (2064) 13.5 13
Sample 1Sample 2
Current and Forecasted Traffic. The District 4 Office of Planning developed the traffic forecasts for the 2062 design year on December 4, 2018. The 2022 Average Daily Traffic (ADT) on SR 87 from PM 0.0 to PM 6.1 is 208,700 vehicles. The ADT is expected to increase to a projected demand of 268,400 vehicles by 2062. Also, the 2020 percentage of trucks (% trucks) is 2.39%, and it is expected to remain at 2.39% in 2062. Table 4-5 shows the current and forecasted traffic information on SR 87 from PM 0.0 to PM 6.1 for design years 2018, 2022, 2032, 2042, and 2062. Table 4-5: Current and Forecasted Mainline Vehicle Traffic Data on SR 87 from PM 0.0 to PM 6.1 Description Present Year (2018) Construction Year (2022) 10-Year Forecast (2032) 20-Year Forecast (2042) 40-Year Forecast (2062) ADT 202,800 208,700 223,600 238,500 268,400 DHV — — — 18,400 — % Trucks 2.39 2.39 2.39 2.39 2.39 Median lanes TI — — 9.50 10.00 11.00 Median lanes ESAL — — 1,342,000 2,775,000 5,920,000 Two right lanes TI — — 11.00 12.00 13.00 Two right lanes ESAL — — 5,366,000 11,100,000 23,683,000 Notes: — = not applicable ADT = Average Daily Traffic DHV = Design Hourly Volume ESAL = Equivalent Single Axle Load PM = post mile(s) SR = State Route TI = Traffic Index Collision Analysis The District 4 Office of Traffic Safety provided the accident data and analysis on July 22, 2020. A total of 1,048 accidents, with one fatal accident, occurred within the project limits (SR 87 from PM 0.0 to PM 6.1) during the most-recent available 3-year period (October 1, 2016, to September 30, 2019). The actual fatal accident rate is lower than the average fatal accident rate for similar facilities statewide. The fatal accident occurred on the southbound (SB) SR 87 off-ramp to Almaden Expressway on June 16, 2019, at 06:48 hours. Vehicle one (V1) was traveling at 80 miles per hour. Due to an unsafe speed, person 1 (P1) was unable to successfully negotiate the westerly curve in the roadway. This failure allowed the left rear of V1 to collide with a pile of dirt on the east side of the roadway. V1 then lost control and rotated in a counterclockwise direction, causing V1 to leave the west side of the roadway. V1 then collided with the sound wall on the west side of the roadway two times. The force by which V1 collided with the sound wall, caused V1 to overturn three times, colliding with the dirt embankment on the west side of the roadway each time. P1 sustained fatal injuries as a result of this collision. P1 caused the collision by traveling at an u...
Sample 1Sample 2
Current and Forecasted Traffic. Peak hour volumes for both AM and PM and average daily traffic (ADT) volumes for existing conditions and opening year and design year Build Alternative and No Build Alternative within the project limits are summarized in Table 4-2. 2 The TOAR qualitatively analyzed traffic conditions in the event that, due to funding and other constraints, the project opening year is 2026 instead of 2025, and subsequently the project design year is 2046 instead of 2045. See Sections 4.3.3.1 and 4.3.3.2, below. 04 - ALA - 680 – PM R10.6/R21.9 04 - CC - 680 – PM R0.0/R1.1 EA: 04-0Q3000 Project ID: 0418000069 PPNO: 2905F November 2020 Table 4-2: Existing and Forecasted Peak Hour and ADT Volumes Facility Existing 2025 2045 No Build Build No Build Build AM Peak PM Peak ADT AM Peak PM Peak ADT AM Peak PM Peak ADT AM Peak PM Peak ADT AM Peak PM Peak ADT SB I-680: Between Alcosta and I-580 7,702 7,048 107,000 8,365 9,005 119,000 8,425 9,005 119,000 10,085 11,640 151,000 10,260 11,640 151,000 SB I-680: Between I- 580 and Stoneridge 5,080 5,618 81,000 5,900 6,315 89,000 5,950 6,335 89,000 6,795 8,240 112,000 6,995 8,330 112,000 SB I-680: Between Xxxxxxxxxx and Xxxxxx 5,099 5,965 76,000 5,535 6,645 84,000 5,585 6,665 84,000 6,310 8,520 105,000 6,510 8,610 105,000 SB I-680: Between Sunol and Xxxxxxx 5,530 5,396 77,000 7,045 5,885 83,000 7,070 5,905 83,000 8,025 7,205 100,000 8,140 7,295 100,000 SB I-680: Between Xxxxxxx and Calaveras 7,031 5,573 92,000 8,795 6,735 102,000 8,795 6,735 102,000 10,095 8,760 125,000 10,095 8,760 125,000 NB I-680: Between Alcosta and I-580 6,777 6,965 96,000 7,250 7,755 108,000 7,250 7,755 108,000 9,845 9,590 139,000 9,845 9,590 139,000 NB I-680: Between I- 580 and Stoneridge 5,310 6,500 89,000 5,850 7,115 98,000 5,850 7,140 98,000 7,390 8,300 119,000 7,390 8,435 119,000 NB I-680: Between Xxxxxxxxxx and Xxxxxx 4,637 4,549 80,000 5,640 5,935 88,000 5,640 5,965 88,000 7,115 6,850 107,000 7,115 7,005 107,000 NB I-680: Between Sunol and Xxxxxxx 4,608 4,687 72,000 5,145 5,215 80,000 5,145 5,305 80,000 6,665 6,260 100,000 6,665 6,305 100,000 NB I-680: Between Xxxxxxx and Calaveras 4,971 5,650 85,000 5,685 6,750 94,000 5,685 6,750 94,000 7,730 7,955 119,000 7,730 7,955 119,000 Source: Xxxx & Peers 2019
Sample 1
Current and Forecasted Traffic. Table 4-5 lists current and forecasted traffic information for Main Line and Ramps on SR 4 within the project limits. Table 4-5: Current and Forecasted Traffic Information for SR 4 Within the Project Limits Count Year ADT (2015) 90,800 Construction Year ADT (2026) 102,400 Design Year ADT (2046) 123,500 DHV (2046) 8,600 D% 54.1% Truck% 5.09% Notes: ADT = Average Daily Traffic D% = directional distribution (% of traffic moving in the peak travel direction) DHV = Design Hourly Volume SR = State Route Table 4-6 lists the estimated Traffic Indexes (TIs) and Equivalent Single Axle Loads (ESALs) for 20 years and 40 years after the completion of project construction for the mainline.
Sample 1
Current and Forecasted Traffic. The current and forecasted traffic data were obtained from recently conducted traffic counts as well as a Port of Los Angeles/Port of Long Beach traffic model. Existing Traffic The existing average daily traffic (ADT) along the intersection of Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Boulevard and Fries Avenue north of the existing at-grade rail crossing is approximately 13,440 vehicles per day. South Wilmington Grade Separation 5 January 22, 2007 Project Study Report Equivalent Under current conditions, the at-grade railroad crossing operates at a LOS D during the peak periods when a train is present. Future Traffic Future (2030) traffic volumes have been estimated based on anticipated growth in through-traffic and planned/proposed terminal developments in both Ports. By the year 2030, significant increases in traffic on Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Boulevard and Fries Avenue will also result in LOS F operating conditions at the at-grade rail crossing. Without a railroad grade separation, unit trains accessing the West Basin would continue to cause significant delays to truck and vehicle traffic ingress/egressing West Basin destinations. Table 1: Existing and Forecasted Traffic At-Grade Railroad Crossing s/o Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Blvd. and Fries Avenue Existing (2003) Traffic Location ADT {2003 volumes} LOS At-grade railroad crossing (AM) 10,829 B At-grade railroad crossing (PM) 13,440 E Existing (2030) Traffic Location ADT {2030 volumes} LOS At-grade railroad crossing (AM) 18,854 D At-grade railroad crossing (PM) 23,399 F
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Current and Forecasted Traffic 
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3

Related to Current and Forecasted Traffic

  • TRUNK FORECASTING 58.1. CLEC shall provide forecasts for traffic utilization over trunk groups. Orders for trunks that exceed forecasted quantities for forecasted locations will be accommodated as facilities and/or equipment are available. Embarq shall make all reasonable efforts and cooperate in good faith to develop alternative solutions to accommodate orders when facilities are not available. Company forecast information must be provided by CLEC to Embarq twice a year. The initial trunk forecast meeting should take place soon after the first implementation meeting. A forecast should be provided at or prior to the first implementation meeting. The semi-annual forecasts shall project trunk gain/loss on a monthly basis for the forecast period, and shall include:

  • Ongoing Trunk Forecast Requirements Where the Parties have already established interconnection in a LATA, Onvoy shall provide a new or revised traffic forecast that complies with the Frontier Interconnection Trunking Forecast Guide when Xxxxx develops plans or becomes aware of information that will materially affect the Parties’ interconnection in that LATA. Instances that require a new or revised forecast include, but are not limited to: (a) Onvoy plans to deploy a new switch; (b) Onvoy plans to implement a new POI or network architecture; (c) Onvoy plans to rearrange its network; (d) Onvoy plans to convert a One-Way Interconnection Trunk group to a Two-Way Interconnection Trunk group; (e) Onvoy plans to convert a Two-Way Interconnection Trunk group to a One-Way Interconnection Trunk group; or (f) Onvoy expects a significant change in interconnection traffic volume. In addition, upon request by either Party, the Parties shall meet to: (i) review traffic and usage data on End Office and Tandem Interconnection Trunk groups and (ii) determine whether the Parties should establish new Interconnection Trunk groups, augment existing Interconnection Trunk groups, or disconnect existing Interconnection Trunks.

  • LIS Forecasting 7.2.2.8.1 Both CLEC and Qwest shall work in good faith to define a mutually agreed upon forecast of LIS trunking.

  • Required Vendor Sales Reporting By responding to this Solicitation, you agree to report to TIPS all sales made under any awarded Agreement with TIPS. Vendor is required to report all sales under the TIPS contract to TIPS. If the TIPS Member entity requesting a price from the awarded Vendor requests the TIPS contract, Vendor must include the TIPS Contract number on any communications with the TIPS Member entity. If awarded, you will be provided access to the Vendor Portal. To report sales, login to the TIPS Vendor Portal and click on the PO’s and Payments tab. Pages 3-7 of the Vendor Portal User Guide will walk you through the process of reporting sales to TIPS. Please refer to the TIPS Accounting FAQ’s for more information about reporting sales and if you have further questions, contact the Accounting Team at xxxxxxxxxx@xxxx-xxx.xxx. The Vendor or vendor assigned dealers are responsible for keeping record of all sales that go through the TIPS Agreement and submitting same to TIPS.

  • Initial Trunk Forecast Requirements At least ninety (90) days before initiating interconnection in a LATA, iNetworks shall provide Verizon a two (2)-year traffic forecast that complies with the Verizon Interconnection Trunking Forecast Guide, as revised from time to time. This initial traffic forecast will provide the amount of traffic to be delivered to and from Verizon over each of the Interconnection Trunk groups in the LATA over the next eight (8) quarters.

  • Initial Forecasts/Trunking Requirements Because Verizon’s trunking requirements will, at least during an initial period, be dependent on the Customer segments and service segments within Customer segments to whom CSTC decides to market its services, Verizon will be largely dependent on CSTC to provide accurate trunk forecasts for both inbound (from Verizon) and outbound (to Verizon) traffic. Verizon will, as an initial matter, provide the same number of trunks to terminate Reciprocal Compensation Traffic to CSTC as CSTC provides to terminate Reciprocal Compensation Traffic to Verizon. At Verizon’s discretion, when CSTC expressly identifies particular situations that are expected to produce traffic that is substantially skewed in either the inbound or outbound direction, Verizon will provide the number of trunks CSTC suggests; provided, however, that in all cases Verizon’s provision of the forecasted number of trunks to CSTC is conditioned on the following: that such forecast is based on reasonable engineering criteria, there are no capacity constraints, and CSTC’s previous forecasts have proven to be reliable and accurate.

  • Minimum Vendor License Requirements Vendor shall maintain, in current status, all federal, state, and local licenses, bonds and permits required for the operation of the business conducted by Vendor. Vendor shall remain fully informed of and in compliance with all ordinances and regulations pertaining to the lawful provision of goods or services under the TIPS Agreement. TIPS and TIPS Members reserve the right to stop work and/or cancel a TIPS Sale or terminate this or any TIPS Sale Supplemental Agreement involving Vendor if Vendor’s license(s) required to perform under this Agreement or under the specific TIPS Sale have expired, lapsed, are suspended or terminated subject to a 30‐day cure period unless prohibited by applicable statue or regulation.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.