Cumulative Progress Evaluations Sample Clauses

Cumulative Progress Evaluations. (a) Beginning with the second year of employment, tenure earning Assistant Professors eligible for consideration for promotion to Associate Professor shall be apprised of their progress toward promotion. For example, employees hired in Fall 2019 or Spring 2020 will receive their first cumulative progress evaluation in Spring 2021. The appraisal shall be included as a separate component of the annual evaluation and is intended to provide assistance and counseling to candidates to help them to qualify themselves for promotion. Tenured employees eligible for consideration for promotion to Professor shall be apprised of their progress toward promotion at least once prior to submitting their promotion dossier. The employee may request, in writing, a meeting with an administrator at the next higher level to discuss concerns regarding the promotion appraisal which were not resolved in previous discussions with the evaluator.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Cumulative Progress Evaluations. (a) Beginning with the second year of employment, Assistant Professors eligible for consideration for promotion to Associate Professor shall be apprised of their progress toward promotion. For example, employees hired Fall 2012 or Spring 2013 will receive their first cumulative progress evaluation in Spring 2014. The appraisal shall be included as a separate component of the annual evaluation and is intended to provide assistance and counseling to candidates to help them to qualify themselves for promotion. The employee may request, in writing, a meeting with an administrator at the next higher level to discuss concerns regarding the promotion appraisal which were not resolved in previous discussions with the evaluator.
Cumulative Progress Evaluations. (a) Policy. EmployeesTenure earning or tenured employees eligible for consideration for promotion to the rank of associate professor and/or tenure shall be informed annually of their progress toward promotion and/or tenure. Each year’s cumulative progress evaluation shall build upon prior cumulative progress evaluations so an employee’s progress toward tenure and/or promotion in a given year will be viewed in the context of attainments over the entire tenure and/or promotion earning period. Employees eligible for promotion to professor may, at their option and upon written request,shall be similarly apprised of their progress toward promotion. at least once prior to submitting their promotion dossier. The cumulative progress evaluations are intended to provide an accurate assessment of cumulative performance as leading to attainment of promotion and/or tenure, and to provide assistance and counseling to candidates to help them qualify themselves for tenure and/or promotion..
Cumulative Progress Evaluations. 747 (a) Policy. Tenure earning or tenured employees eligible for consideration for promotion to the rank of 748 associate professor and/or tenure shall be informed annually of their progress toward promotion and/or 749 tenure. Each year’s cumulative progress evaluation shall build upon prior cumulative progress evaluations so 750 an employee’s progress toward tenure and/or promotion in a given year will be viewed in the context of 751 attainments over the entire tenure and/or promotion earning period. Employees eligible for promotion to 752 professor shall be similarly apprised of their progress toward promotion at least once prior to submitting 753 their promotion dossier. The cumulative progress evaluations are intended to provide an accurate 754 assessment of cumulative performance as leading to attainment of promotion and/or tenure, and to 755 provide assistance and counseling to candidates to help them qualify themselves for tenure and/or 756 promotion.
Cumulative Progress Evaluations. Beginning in the second year of employment, employees eligible for consideration for promotion to the rank of associate professor and/or tenure shall be informed annually of their progress toward promotion and/or tenure. Each year’s cumulative progress evaluation shall build upon prior cumulative progress evaluations so that an employee’s progress toward tenure and/or promotion in a given year will be viewed in the context of attainments over the entire tenure and/or promotion earning period. The cumulative progress evaluations are intended to provide an accurate assessment of cumulative performance as leading to attainment of promotion and/or tenure.
Cumulative Progress Evaluations. All cumulative progress evaluations shall be completed during the same semester as the annual performance evaluation. Beginning with the second year of employment, an employee who is eligible for tenure and/or promotion to the rank of associate professor shall receive a cumulative progress evaluation, to inform the employee of his or her progress toward tenure and/or promotion. In subsequent years, such an employee shall receive a cumulative progress evaluation to inform the employee of his or her progress towards tenure. The cumulative progress evaluation is intended to provide assistance and counseling to candidates to help them to qualify themselves for tenure and/or promotion. Separate cumulative progress evaluations shall be provided by the tenured faculty members of the department/unit (excluding the chair/head and xxxx). For cumulative evaluations of progress towards promotion to professor, only tenured professors participate in the tenured faculty member’s evaluation. If the department or unit has fewer than three tenured faculty or tenured professors, as appropriate, the xxxx may increase the committee membership to three using tenured faculty or tenured professors, as appropriate, from other departments or units. The employee may request, in writing, a meeting with an administrator at the next higher level to discuss concerns regarding the cumulative progress evaluation which were not resolved in previous discussions with the evaluator.
Cumulative Progress Evaluations. (1) Progress toward the promotion to the rank of associate professor with tenure will be assessed based on professional performance of teaching, research, and service, and the likelihood of future contributions at or exceeding current levels of performance.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Cumulative Progress Evaluations 

Related to Cumulative Progress Evaluations

  • PROGRESS EVALUATION Engineer shall, from time to time during the progress of the Engineering Services, confer with County at County’s election. Engineer shall prepare and present such information as may be pertinent and necessary, or as may be reasonably requested by County, in order for County to evaluate features of the Engineering Services. At the request of County or Engineer, conferences shall be provided at Engineer's office, the offices of County, or at other locations designated by County. When requested by County, such conferences shall also include evaluation of the Engineering Services. County may, from time to time, require Engineer to appear and provide information to the Xxxxxxxxxx County Commissioners Court. Should County determine that the progress in Engineering Services does not satisfy an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, then County shall review same with Engineer to determine corrective action required. Engineer shall promptly advise County in writing of events which have or may have a significant impact upon the progress of the Engineering Services, including but not limited to the following:

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • Performance Evaluations 34.1. The Contractor is subject to an annual performance evaluation to be conducted by NYCDOT pursuant to the PPB Rules.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. Xxxxxxxxx & Xxxxxx will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Completion of Evaluation Cycle 1. The summative evaluation rating shall be based upon a preponderance of the evidence, assessed in a holistic manner, that is aligned to the Ohio Educator Standards. Only evidence gathered during the walkthroughs and formal observations that are conducted for the current school year may be used.

  • Student Evaluations Student evaluations shall be completed by the end of the 12th week of the fall semester.

  • Annual Performance Evaluation On either a fiscal year or calendar year basis, (consistently applied from year to year), the Bank shall conduct an annual evaluation of Executive’s performance. The annual performance evaluation proceedings shall be included in the minutes of the Board meeting that next follows such annual performance review.

  • Contractor Performance Evaluations The Contract Administrator will evaluate Contractor’s performance as often as the Contract Administrator deems necessary throughout the term of the contract. This evaluation will be based on criteria including the quality of goods or services, the timeliness of performance, and adherence to applicable laws, including prevailing wage and living wage. City will provide Contractors who receive an unsatisfactory rating with a copy of the evaluation and an opportunity to respond. City may consider final evaluations, including Contractor’s response, in evaluating future proposals and bids for contract award.

  • Long Term Cost Evaluation Criterion # 4 READ CAREFULLY and see in the RFP document under "Proposal Scoring and Evaluation". Points will be assigned to this criterion based on your answer to this Attribute. Points are awarded if you agree not i ncrease your catalog prices (as defined herein) more than X% annually over the previous year for years two and thr ee and potentially year four, unless an exigent circumstance exists in the marketplace and the excess price increase which exceeds X% annually is supported by documentation provided by you and your suppliers and shared with TIP S, if requested. If you agree NOT to increase prices more than 5%, except when justified by supporting documentati on, you are awarded 10 points; if 6% to 14%, except when justified by supporting documentation, you receive 1 to 9 points incrementally. Price increases 14% or greater, except when justified by supporting documentation, receive 0 points. increases will be 5% or less annually per question Required Confidentiality Claim Form Required Confidentiality Claim Form This completed form is required by TIPS. By submitting a response to this solicitation you agree to download from th e “Attachments” section, complete according to the instructions on the form, then uploading the completed form, wit h any confidential attachments, if applicable, to the “Response Attachments” section titled “Confidentiality Form” in order to provide to TIPS the completed form titled, “CONFIDENTIALITY CLAIM FORM”. By completing this process, you provide us with the information we require to comply with the open record laws of the State of Texas as they ma y apply to your proposal submission. If you do not provide the form with your proposal, an award will not be made if your proposal is qualified for an award, until TIPS has an accurate, completed form from you. Read the form carefully before completing and if you have any questions, email Xxxx Xxxxxx at TIPS at xxxx.xxxxxx@t xxx-xxx.xxx

  • MANAGEMENT OF EVALUATION OUTCOMES 12.1 The evaluation of the Employee’s performance will form the basis for rewarding outstanding performance or correcting unacceptable performance.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.