COSTS DISTRIBUTED THROUGH COUNTYWIDE COST ALLOCATIONS Sample Clauses

COSTS DISTRIBUTED THROUGH COUNTYWIDE COST ALLOCATIONS. The indirect overhead and support service costs listed in Schedule A (attached) are formally approved as actual costs for fiscal year 2016-17, and as estimated costs for fiscal year 2018-19 on a “fixed with carry-forward” basis. These costs may be included as part of the county departments’ costs indicated effective July 1, 2018, for further allocation to federal grants and contracts performed by the respective county departments. County of Tehama - 2 - April 30, 2018
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
COSTS DISTRIBUTED THROUGH COUNTYWIDE COST ALLOCATIONS. The indirect overhead and support service costs listed in Exhibit A (attached) are formally approved as actual costs for fiscal year 2016-17, and as estimated costs for fiscal year 2018-19 on a “fixed with carry-forward” basis. These costs may be included as part of the county departments’ costs indicated effective July 1, 2018, for further allocation to federal grants and contracts performed by the respective county departments. County of Riverside - 2 - August 24, 2018
COSTS DISTRIBUTED THROUGH COUNTYWIDE COST ALLOCATIONS. The indirect overhead and support service costs listed in Schedule A (attached) are formally approved as actual costs for fiscal year 2016-17, and as estimated costs for fiscal year 2018-19 on a “fixed with carry-forward” basis. These costs may be included as part of the county departments’ costs indicated effective July 1, 2018, for further allocation to federal grants and contracts performed by the respective county departments. County of San Xxxxxxx - 2 - September 28, 2018
COSTS DISTRIBUTED THROUGH COUNTYWIDE COST ALLOCATIONS. The indirect overhead and support service costs listed in the Summary Schedule (attached) are formally approved as actual costs for the 2012-13 fiscal year and as estimated costs for the 2014- 15 fiscal year on a "fixed with carry-forward" basis. These costs may be included as part of the costs of the county departments indicated effective July 1, 2014, for further allocation to federal grants and contracts performed by the respective county departments. County of Mono - 2 - September 30, 2014
COSTS DISTRIBUTED THROUGH COUNTYWIDE COST ALLOCATIONS. The indirect overhead and support service costs listed in Schedule A (attached) are formally approved as actual costs for fiscal year 2016-17, and as estimated costs for fiscal year 2018-19 on a “fixed with carry-forward” basis. These costs may be included as part of the county departments’ costs indicated effective July 1, 2018, for further allocation to federal grants and contracts performed by the respective county departments. County of Santa Xxxxxxx - 2 - July 30, 2018
COSTS DISTRIBUTED THROUGH COUNTYWIDE COST ALLOCATIONS. The indirect overhead and support service costs listed in Schedule A (attached) are formally approved as actual costs for fiscal year 2016-17, and as estimated costs for fiscal year 2018-19 on a “fixed with carry-forward” basis. These costs may be included as part of the county departments’ costs indicated effective July 1, 2018, for further allocation to federal grants and contracts performed by the respective county departments. County of Santa Xxxxx - 2 - March 23, 2018
COSTS DISTRIBUTED THROUGH COUNTYWIDE COST ALLOCATIONS. The indirect overhead and support service costs listed in the Summary Schedule (attached) are formally approved as actual costs for fiscal year 2019-20, and as estimated costs for fiscal year 2021-22 on a “fixed with carry-forward” basis. These costs may be included as part of the county departments’ costs indicated effective July 1, 2021, for further allocation to federal grants and contracts performed by the respective county departments. City/County of San Francisco - 2 - August 10, 2021 SECTION II: COSTS DISTRIBUTED THROUGH BILLING OR COST TRANSFER MECHANISMS
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
COSTS DISTRIBUTED THROUGH COUNTYWIDE COST ALLOCATIONS. The indirect overhead and support service costs listed in Exhibit A (attached) are formally approved as actual costs for fiscal year 2019-20, and as estimated costs for fiscal year 2021-22 on a “fixed with carry-forward” basis. These costs may be included as part of the county departments’ costs indicated effective July 1, 2021, for further allocation to federal grants and contracts performed by the respective county departments. County of Shasta - 2 - March 15, 2021 SECTION II: COSTS DISTRIBUTED THROUGH BILLING OR COST TRANSFER MECHANISMS
COSTS DISTRIBUTED THROUGH COUNTYWIDE COST ALLOCATIONS. The indirect overhead and support service costs listed in Schedule A (attached) are formally approved as actual costs for the 2013-14 fiscal year and as estimated costs for the 2015-16 fiscal year on a "fixed with carry-forward" basis. These costs may be included as part of the costs of the county departments indicated effective July 1, 2015, for further allocation to federal grants and contracts performed by the respective county departments. County of Fresno -2- September 29, 2015
COSTS DISTRIBUTED THROUGH COUNTYWIDE COST ALLOCATIONS. The indirect overhead and support service costs listed in Schedule A (attached) are formally approved as actual costs for fiscal year 2020-21, and as estimated costs for fiscal year 2022-23 on a “fixed with carry-forward” basis. These costs may be included as part of the county departments’ costs indicated effective July 1, 2022, for further allocation to federal grants and contracts performed by the respective county departments. County of Trinity - 2 - September 28, 2022
Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.