Cost of Implementation Sample Clauses

Cost of Implementation. The cost of implementing committee agreements and resolutions shall be shared equally by LRCEA and the District. Salary and fringe benefit costs resulting from such agreements shall be borne by LRCEA’s proportionate share of new monies.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (6)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Cost of Implementation. Some Members of Congress have expressed concerns about the cost to the federal government to implement the agreements.27 Most have assumed that the majority of actions in the KBRA would be federally funded, including the costs for the on-project plan, fisheries restoration, and tribal components of the agreement. A detailed discussion of the estimated costs for the agreements (in particular those for the KBRA) and how they have changed over time is provided below. There have been multiple estimates of the cost to implement the Klamath agreements, and in some cases these have contradicted one another or employed differing assumptions. The original 2010 KBRA estimated $970 million (in 2007 dollars) for the total cost to implement the KBRA over a 10-year window. Most of these costs were assumed to be incurred by the federal government, although the exact split was not specified.28 In 2011, this figure was revised to estimate the federal government’s portion of expenses over a newly extended 15-year window. This estimate indicated that the federal cost to implement the agreement over 15 years would be $795 million (2007 dollars). Thus, there was a reduction in the estimated costs using constant 2007 dollars. The 2011 revision reflected increased state commitments for some activities and altered assumptions in other areas.29 The 2011 estimate also included an estimate of “base” 25 DOI has estimated that dam removal itself will create approximately 1,400 jobs in the one-year timeframe for this project, while other actions under the KBRA will create 4,600 jobs over 15 years, with additional gains to farming and fisheries industries; See Klamath Regional Economics Fact Sheet, available at xxxx://xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx/sites/ xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx/xxxxx/Xxxx.Xxxx.Xxxxx.Xxxx.00.xxx. 26 Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxxx, “Dewatering Trust Responsibility: the New Klamath River Hydroelectric and Restoration Agreements,” Washington Journal of Environmental Law and Policy, vol. 1, no. 1 (July 2011), p. 60. Available at xxxx://xxxxxxx.xxx.xxxxxxxxxx.xxx/dspace-law/bitstream/handle/1773.1/1043/1WJELP042.pdf?sequence=1. 27 U.S. Congress, Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, Water Resource Issues in the Klamath River Basin, 113th Cong., 1st sess., June 20, 2013. Statement of Chairman Xxx Xxxxx, xxxx://xxx.xxxxxx.xxxxxx.xxx/public/ index.cfm/files/serve?File_id=bf0f660b-1905-4515-9278-c26ddda53a21. 28 Cost estimates for the agreement were originally provided in the KBRA, Appe...
Sample 1Sample 2
Cost of Implementation. The parties agree that the effective date of this new job classification system shall be August 1, 2003. For the purpose of adjusting the wage of those employees, who are eligible for a wage adjustment, as provided by the new classification system, the GTAA will allocate the following amounts: Year Maximum Total Adjustment per Year August 1, 2003 to July 31, 2004 $100,000 August 1, 2004 to July 31, 2005 $125,000 August 1, 2005 to July 31, 2006 $150,000 August 1, 2006 to July 31, 2007 $30,000 August 1, 2007 to July 31, 2008 $30,000 August 1, 2008 to July 31, 2009 $30,000 August 1, 2009 to July 31, 2010 $35,000 The formula for calculating adjustments will be as follows: • where the positions are found to be overvalued as a result of the new wage classification system, the incumbent of those positions will not receive any further wage increases until such time they reach their equivalent wage on the newly assigned wages and salary rates. • a salaried employee whose new classification carries a maximum rate of pay which is higher than his or her previous maximum shall have his or her salary adjusted upward to the increment which is nearest to but not less than his or her current rate of pay; • an hourly employee who is reclassified to a higher hourly paid position shall be paid the hourly rate prescribed for the position. The distribution of the above maximum total annual adjustments will be allocated on a pro-rata basis in relation to the job rate gap. The third party’s jurisdiction shall be restricted to this Memorandum of Understanding. All time limits referred to herein may be adjusted by mutual agreement. The parties agree that the application of this memorandum is only relevant and only pertains to employees who filed appeals under Section 7 of this Memorandum and who are currently working in the jobs in which they were working when the appeals were filed. With the exception of the foregoing all the provisions of this Memorandum shall be deemed to have been exhausted. Appendix ‘F1’ MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN: THE GREATER TORONTO AIRPORTS AUTHORITY (Hereinafter referred to as the “Employer”) And UNIFOR (Hereinafter referred to as the “Union”)
Sample 1

Related to Cost of Implementation

  • Project Implementation 2. The Borrower shall:

  • Examination of Implementation 1. Without prejudice to the procedures set out in Article 188 (Compensation), once the period of time set out in paragraph 3 of Article 186 (Implementation of the Report) has expired, and there is disagreement between the disputing Parties as to the existence or consistency of the measures taken to comply with the Panel report, such dispute shall be referred to the original Panel wherever possible. If not possible, the procedure pursuant to Article 179 (Panel Selection) shall be followed to appoint a new Panel, in which event the periods set out thereof shall be reduced by half (22). 2. This Panel shall issue its report on the matter within 60 days after the date of the referral of the matter to it. When the Panel considers that it cannot provide its report within this timeframe, it shall inform the Parties in writing of the reasons for the delay together with an estimate of the period within which it will submit its report. Any delay shall not exceed a further period of 30 days unless the Parties otherwise agree.

  • Project Scope The physical scope of the Project shall be limited to only those capital improvements as described in Appendix A of this Agreement. In the event that circumstances require a change in such physical scope, the change must be approved by the District Committee, recorded in the District Committee's official meeting minutes, and provided to the OPWC Director for the execution of an amendment to this Agreement.

  • CONSTRUCTION AND RELATED ENGINEERING SERVICES A. General construction work for buildings (CPC 512) 1) Unbound* 2) None 3) None 1) Unbound* 2) None 3) None

  • Construction Activities Please list all major construction activities, both planned and completed, to be performed by Seller or the EPC Contractor. Activity EPC Contractor / Subcontractor Completion Date __/__/____ (expected / actual) __/__/____ (expected / actual)

  • Implementation Services The Company and the Client have developed a plan for implementing the services to be provided hereunder, including with respect to the transition of responsibility for such services from the Client and its current administrator to the Company, which plan attached hereto as Schedule I (the “Implementation Plan”). The Company shall perform the services required to complete the Implementation Plan, as set forth therein (the “Implementation Services”). The Company and the Client shall comply with any applicable requirements agreed in the Implementation Plan.

  • Commencement of Interconnection Activities If the Developer executes the final LGIA, the ISO, Connecting Transmission Owner and the Developer shall perform their respective obligations in accordance with the terms of the LGIA, subject to modification by FERC. Upon submission of an unexecuted LGIA in accordance with Section 30.11.3, the Parties shall promptly comply with the unexecuted LGIA, subject to modification by FERC.

  • Project Implementation Manual The Recipient, through the PCU, shall: (i) take all action required to carry out Parts 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 2, 3.1(b), 3.2, 3.3 and 4 (ii) of the Project in accordance with the provisions and requirements set forth or referred to in the Project Implementation Manual; (ii) submit recommendations to the Association for its consideration for changes and updates of the Project Implementation Manual as they may become necessary or advisable during Project implementation in order to achieve the objective of Parts 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 2, 3.1(b), 3.2, 3.3 and 4(ii) of the Project; and (iii) not assign, amend, abrogate or waive the Project Implementation Manual or any of its provisions without the Association’s prior agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if any of the provisions of the Project Implementation Manual is inconsistent with the provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of this Agreement shall prevail and govern.

  • Implementation Report Within 150 days after the Effective Date, Extendicare shall submit a written report to OIG summarizing the status of its implementation of the requirements of this CIA (Implementation Report). The Implementation Report shall, at a minimum, include:

  • Implementation Specifications 1. The accounting shall contain the date, nature, and purpose of such disclosures, and the name and address of the person or agency to whom the disclosure is made.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.