COST JUSTIFICATION Sample Clauses

COST JUSTIFICATION. In the event only one response is received, the City may require that the bidder submit a cost proposal in sufficient detail for the City to perform a cost/price analysis to determine if the bid price is fair and reasonable.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
COST JUSTIFICATION. Provide narrative justification for your proposed cost per mile in each of the categories listed on this price sheet. NEW FREEDOM TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM To: County of Orange, OC Community Resources/Office on Aging Check Request For: 0000 X. Xxxxx Xxx, Xxxx X Xxxxx Xxx, XX 00000 Contract # SAMPLE INVOICE INVOICE: Month Year BUDGET: REM. BAL: Amounts Invoiced Date Invoice Number Previous Number Total Rate Per Month Contract Contract Mileage Type of Trips Miles Mile Subtotal To Date To Date
Sample 1Sample 2
COST JUSTIFICATION. Source Atlantic provides clients with an objective assessment of the financial impact of implementing new technology. The consulting team builds an objective financial model that includes operational, technical, clinical and market-impact analyses.
Sample 1Sample 2
COST JUSTIFICATION. Describe the use of MHSA funds in each of the project budget categories: personnel, hardware, software, contract services and other expenses. Describe the use and amount of start-up funds for the project. Start-up funds may be requested for up to 20% of the total project proposal MHSA amount. Start-up funds may only be requested once per project proposal. Describe project costs that are not eligible for reimbursement by MHSA IT funds. Non- eligible costs include IT project costs for applications or systems that support services to non-DMH clients or IT project costs for applications or systems that support non-Mental Health Services programs. Describe the proposed allocation methodology to determine project costs to be paid by DMH MHSA IT funds.
Sample 1
COST JUSTIFICATION. To calculate maximum allowable start-up {(a+d+e+f) X 0.20 = maximum start-up}. Once calculated distribute start-up funds in column Fiscal Year 1 (b) in the budget categories where start-up funds are needed. You may request less than the maximum allowable, but you may not exceed the maximum allowable start-up. Start-up funds will be awarded one-time-only per project. ** For projects providing services to multiple program clients (e.g. Mental Health and Alcohol and Drug Program clients) attach a description of estimated benefits and Project costs allocated to programs other than Mental Health. FAX forms to: DMH CIOB Attn: CPTT using the FAX Number: 000-000-0000. Email a copy to: XXXX@xxx.xxxxxxxx.xxx Summary Project Schedule Appendix C For Technological Needs Project Proposal Project Title: Consortium (Y/N): Contract Agency Name: Legal Entity Number: ID Number Summary Task/Milestone Name Duration in Days Original Start Revised Start Original Completion Revised Completion Detail Project Schedule Appendix C-1 For Technological Needs Project Proposal Project Title: Consortium (Y/N): Contract Agency Name: Legal Entity Number: ID Number Task Name Duration in Days Original Start Revised Start Original Completion Revised Completion Appendix A: Project Risk Assessment Project Title: Consortium (Y/N) Contract Agency Name: LE Number: *Score NA if category is not applicable Category Factor Rating Score* Estimated Cost of Project Over $400,000 6 (MHSA Funds Only) Over $200,000 5 Over $100,000 2 Under $100,000 1 Project Manager Experience Like Projects completed in a “key staff” role None 3 One 2 Two or More 1 Team Experience Like Projects Completed by at least 75% of Key Staff None 3 One 2 Two or More 1 Elements of Project Type Hardware New Install Local Desktop/Server 1 Distributed/Enterprise Server 3 Update/Upgrade Local Desktop/Server 1 Distributed/Enterprise Server 2 Infrastructure Local Network Cabling 1 Distributed Network 2 Data Center/Network Operations Center 3 Custom Development- 5 Application Service Provider 1 Software *Commercial Off-The-Shelf COTS* Installation “Off-the-Shelf” 1 Modified COTS 3 Number of Users Over 300 5 Over 100 3 Under 20 1 Architecture Browser/thin client based 1 Two-Tier (client / server) 2 Multi-Tier (client & web, database, application, etc. servers) 3 Software TOTAL SCORE Total Score Project Risk Rating check applicable rating (√) 25 – 31 High 16 – 24 Medium 8 – 15 Low EXHIBIT B PROJECT STATUS REPORT EXHIBIT B County of Los Angeles ...
Sample 1

Related to COST JUSTIFICATION

  • Root Cause Analysis Upon Vendor's failure to provide the Services in accordance with the applicable Service Levels (for any reason other than a Force Majeure Event) Vendor will promptly (a) perform a root-cause analysis to identify the cause of such failure, (b) provide Prudential with a report detailing the cause of, and procedure for correcting, such failure, (c) obtain Prudential's written approval of the proposed procedure for correcting such failure, (d) correct such failure in accordance with the approved procedure, (e) provide weekly (or more frequent, if appropriate) reports on the status of the correction efforts, and (f) provide Prudential with assurances satisfactory to Prudential that such failure has been corrected and will not recur.

  • Preparation; Reasonable Investigation In connection with the ------------------------------------- preparation and filing of each registration statement under the Securities Act pursuant to this Agreement, the Company will give the holders of Registrable Securities registered under such registration statement, their underwriters, if any, and their respective counsel and accountants, the opportunity to participate in the preparation of such registration statement, each prospectus included therein or filed with the Commission, and each amendment thereof or supplement thereto, and will give each of them such access to its books and records and such opportunities to discuss the business of the Company with its officers and the independent public accountants who have certified its financial statements as shall be necessary, in the opinion of such holders' and such underwriters' respective counsel, to conduct a reasonable investigation within the meaning of the Securities Act.

  • Verification Bank may, from time to time, verify directly with the respective Account Debtors the validity, amount and other matters relating to the Accounts, either in the name of Borrower or Bank or such other name as Bank may choose.

  • No Governmental Review Such Buyer understands that no United States federal or state agency or any other government or governmental agency has passed on or made any recommendation or endorsement of the Securities or the fairness or suitability of the investment in the Securities nor have such authorities passed upon or endorsed the merits of the offering of the Securities.

  • Independent Analysis Each Party hereby confirms that its decision to execute this Agreement has been based upon its independent assessment of documents and information available to it, as it has deemed appropriate.

  • Regulation AB Compliance; Intent of the Parties; Reasonableness The parties hereto acknowledge that interpretations of the requirements of Regulation AB may change over time, whether due to interpretive guidance provided by the Commission or its staff, consensus among participants in the asset-backed securities markets, advice of counsel, or otherwise, and agree to comply with all reasonable requests made by the Depositor in good faith for delivery of information under these provisions on the basis of evolving interpretations of Regulation AB. In connection with the Trust, each Servicer, the Trustee and each Custodian shall cooperate fully with the Depositor to deliver to the Depositor (including its assignees or designees), any and all statements, reports, certifications, records and any other information available to such party and reasonably necessary in the good faith determination of the Depositor to permit the Depositor to comply with the provisions of Regulation AB, together with such disclosures relating to each Servicer, the Trustee and each Custodian, as applicable, reasonably believed by the Depositor to be necessary in order to effect such compliance.

  • Recall When it is determined by the Agency to fill a vacancy or to recall employees in a classification where the layoff occurred, the following procedure shall be adhered to: The laid off employee with the most State seniority from the same, similar or related classification series for whom the position does not constitute a promotion as defined in Article 17, and who prior to his/her layoff, held a classification which carried with it the same or higher pay range as the vacancy, shall be recalled first (see Appendix I). All employees who are laid off or displaced out of their classification shall be placed on the recall list by the effective date of their layoff. An employee shall be recalled to a position provided the affected employee is qualified to perform the duties. Any employee recalled under this Article shall not serve a new probationary period, except for any employee laid off who was serving an original or promotional probationary period which shall be completed. Employees shall have recall rights for a period of twenty-four (24) months. Notification of recall shall be by certified mail to the employee’s last known address or hand delivered to the employee with proof of receipt. Employees shall maintain a current address on file with the Agency. Recall rights shall be within the Agency and within recall jurisdictions as outlined in Appendix J. If the employee fails to notify the Agency of his/her intent to report to work within seven (7) days of receipt of the notice of recall, he/she shall forfeit recall rights. Likewise, if the recalled employee does not actually return to work within thirty (30) days, recall rights shall be forfeited. Any employee accepting or declining recall to the same, similar or related classification series and the same appointment category (type) from which the employee was laid off or displaced shall be removed from the recall and reemployment list if recalled to his/her original classification and appointment category (type). Except that any employee declining recall to a different appointment category (type) than that from which he/she was laid off or displaced shall be removed from the recall list for that appointment category (type).

  • Assistance in Litigation Employee shall upon reasonable notice, furnish such information and proper assistance to the Company as it may reasonably require in connection with any litigation in which it is, or may become, a party either during or after employment.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.