Cost Comparison. A summary showing the Project cost compared to similar size and type projects recently built in the region under similar conditions, or a statement that no such comparable projects have been identified. Information regarding projected operating and maintenance costs of the facility or (in the case of renovation) the projected impact of the project on operating and maintenance costs.
Cost Comparison. USFRS shall report to EPA and MPCA on a quarterly basis whether the project is resulting in cost savings for its customer facilities and what aspects of the XL project produce any savings.
Cost Comparison. To be considered for award, Bidder shall offer all the 11 items listed in Attachment A, Exhibit A -Pricing page. Bids that fail to provide every item listed on the Pricing Page shall be deemed non-Responsive and shall not be considered for award. Agency shall award the Price Agreement to the lowest Responsive and Responsible Bidder whose bid substantially complies with the requirements and criteria set forth in this Section. For Bid evaluation purposes, the total estimated annual gas cost will be calculated using the following method: For each item listed in Attachment A, Exhibit A - Pricing Page, Items 1-11, the estimated annual usage amount, provided by Agency, will be multiplied by the price per one Standard Cubic Foot (“SCF”), liters, or pounds as provided by the Bidder. The total estimated annual price of all items will result in the total estimated annual gas cost. For Bid evaluation purposes, the total estimated annual fees and other costs by using the following procedure: For each item listed in Attachment A, Exhibit A - Pricing Page, the estimated frequency, provided by Agency, and multiplied by cost provided by bidder. The total for all items will be calculated by adding together resulting in the total estimated annual amount for fees and other related costs. The total dollar amounts from Exhibit A are to be added together to obtain the total Bid price. DAS PS will evaluate Offers to identify the lowest responsive Offer submitted by a responsible Offeror and not otherwise disqualified. (Refer to ORS 279B.100) Adjustments made to account for reciprocal preferences and percentage of recycled materials incorporated into the Goods will be for Offer evaluation purposes only. (Refer to Section 7.5) No such adjustments shall operate to amend Offeror’s Offer or any Price Agreement awarded pursuant thereto.
Cost Comparison. If an Incremental Energy Bid or Minimum Generation Bid submitted on behalf of a NYCA Resource exceeds $1,000/MWh and complies with the requirements of Sections 23.7.3 (for Generators) or 23.7.4 (for Demand Side Resources) below, then the ISO shall compare the Bid to a cost-based reference level developed in accordance with Sections 23.3.1.4.1.3 and/or 23.3.1.4.2.1, and 23.3.1.4.6 of these Mitigation Measures for Generators, or in accordance with Section 23.7.4 for Demand Side Resources, to determine if it must apply a Bid Restriction.
Cost Comparison. As an Intermediate Procurement, Agency shall award the Price Agreement in accordance with ORS 279B.070, awarding Price Agreements to the Offeror/s whose bid/s will best serve the interests of the Agency, taking into account price as well as considerations including, but not limited to, experience, expertise, product functionality, suitability for a particular purpose and contractor responsibility under ORS 279B.110. At Agencies discretion,
Cost Comparison. Authorized Purchaser may conduct a Product or Service specific comparison based upon price. Small Purchases, Contractor Selection Process: For purchases under $10,000, Authorized Purchasers may select the Contractor of its choice in compliance with applicable statute and rule.
