Contractor Review Sample Clauses

Contractor Review. A copy of the evaluation will be provided to the contractor as soon as practicable after completion of the evaluation. The contractor shall submit comments, rebutting statements, or additional information to the Contracting Officer within 30 calendar days after receipt of the evaluation.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (12)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Contractor Review. Contractor shall cooperate with Owner Parties to develop an internet-based system to provide an up-to-date Submittal log. The Submittal log shall include proposed submittal dates and review time for each item, and the approval status of each Submittal. Contractor shall prepare, review, approve, and submit to Owner Parties, with reasonable promptness and in such sequence as to cause no Delay in the Work or in the work of Owner’s Separate Contractors, all Submittals and mock-ups required by the Contract Documents. All Submittals shall be delivered in sufficient time to allow reviewing parties reasonable time for consideration and Contractor adequate time for resubmission if required. Contractor shall cooperate with Owner Parties and coordinate Contractor’s Submittals with those of Owner’s Separate Contractors. Prior to Contractor’s submission to Owner Parties, Contractor shall cause all Submittals to conform to the Contract Documents, and shall confirm and evidence such conformity with Contractor’s review stamp marked “approved.” Owner Parties will annotate, correct, and stamp the Submittals as necessary, indicating what further action is necessary and appropriate, and return each Submittal to Contractor. Submittals corrected by Contractor and resubmitted for review and approval containing changes other than those indicated by Owner Parties shall have such additional, new changes, clearly marked to bring them to Owner Parties’ attention as well as fully explained in a contemporaneous writing. In the event a Submittal is not approved, Contractor will be notified of the reasons for disapproval and Contractor shall timely re-submit the revised unapproved Submittal until approved. By presenting each Submittal to Owner Parties, Contractor represents that it has determined, verified, and approved all Materials and field measurements and criteria related to that Submittal and has confirmed each such Submittal meets the requirements of the Contract Documents. If a Submittal requires professional design services or certifications under the Contract Documents, Owner Parties will specify all performance and design criteria of such Submittal. Contractor shall cause a properly licensed design professional to deliver such services or certifications, and each affected Submittal document shall bear the signature and seal of that professional, as licensed in the state where the Project is located. Owner Parties shall be entitled to rely upon Contractor’s design professionals...
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (10)
Contractor Review. The Contractor shall comply with the requirements of the design embodied in the Contract. Prior to submission of plans, calculations and designs to MDC or any regulatory agency as part of this Contract, the Contractor must have them reviewed and stamped by a registered Professional Engineer (PE) licensed by one of the 50 states of the United States or the District of Columbia. It is the responsibility of the PE to ensure that he or she does not exceed the scope of his or her PE license. The PE stamp must appear on the certified document itself.
Sample 1Sample 2
Contractor Review. The Contractor must review all construction submittals to ensure that the materials and proposed method of construction are compatible with the existing site conditions. The Contractor’s work plan must be developed to allow Railroad traffic to remain in service per Railroad requirements and C&M Agreement.
Sample 1Sample 2
Contractor Review. The Contractor shall review and compare the list of all drawings identified in Schedule "D" - Technical Specifications with the drawings received by the Contractor and notify the Owner immediately of any shortages, inconsistencies in drawing numbers, revisions and omissions and discrepancies in these drawings.
Sample 1
Contractor Review. Contractor may conduct its customary and usual programs for quality improvement and utilization review upon Covered Persons. The findings of such reviews of Covered Persons shall be provided to RME to the extent allowed by Colorado law.
Sample 1
Contractor Review. A. Review submittals prior to transmittal; determine and verify Engineer’s dimensions, field measurements, field construction criteria, manufacturers’ catalog numbers and conformance of submittal with requirements of Contract Documents.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Contractor Review

  • Contractor If COUNTY elects to renegotiate this Agreement due to reduced or terminated 20 funding, CONTRACTOR shall not be obligated to accept the renegotiated terms.

  • Contract Review Agent shall have reviewed all material contracts of Borrowers including, without limitation, leases, union contracts, labor contracts, vendor supply contracts, license agreements and distributorship agreements and such contracts and agreements shall be satisfactory in all respects to Agent;

  • Subcontractor Any vendor, subcontractor or other Person that is not responsible for the overall servicing (as “servicing” is commonly understood by participants in the mortgage-backed securities market) of Mortgage Loans but performs one or more discrete functions identified in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB with respect to Mortgage Loans under the direction or authority of the Servicer or a Subservicer.

  • Review Scope The parties confirm that the Asset Representations Review is not responsible for (a) reviewing the Receivables for compliance with the representations and warranties under the Transaction Documents, except as described in this Agreement or (b) determining whether noncompliance with the representations and warranties constitutes a breach of the Eligibility Representations. For the avoidance of doubt, the parties confirm that the review is not designed to determine why an Obligor is delinquent or the creditworthiness of the Obligor, either at the time of any Asset Review or at the time of origination of the related Receivable. Further, the Asset Review is not designed to establish cause, materiality or recourse for any Test Fail (as defined in Section 3.05).

  • Contractor Responsibilities 19.1. Contractor shall perform national criminal history checks for Ohio, Indiana, and Kentucky, and 10-panel drug screening tests on all prospective employees performing work under this RFP or coming onto a CMHA property and any resulting contract and provide summaries of the results to the Authority if requested. For the purposes of this section, the term “employees” includes contractor. Prospective employees whose criminal background check discloses a misdemeanor or felony involving crimes of moral turpitude, sexual offenses or harm to persons or property shall not be employed to perform work under this RFP or any resulting contract. Contractor is required to perform drug screening of all employees and to ensure acceptable test results. Criminal history and drug screening checks will be completed at the sole expense of the contractor. Any employee of the Contractor suspected of being under the influence of drugs and or alcohol will be reported to the appropriate personnel at CMHA and/or other local law enforcement. If the employee is determined to be under the influence of drugs or alcohol in any form or manner, or believed by proper authority to be dealing in illicit sale of alcohol or drugs they will be removed and shall not be allowed to return to any job site on the Authority’s property. The Contractor’s contract may be suspended and/or terminated should such a situation occur or if the Contractor fails to submit results pursuant to this section.

  • Quality Assurance The parties endorse the underlying principles of the Company’s Quality Management System, which seeks to ensure that its services are provided in a manner which best conforms to the requirements of the contract with its customer. This requires the Company to establish and maintain, implement, train and continuously improve its procedures and processes, and the employees to follow the procedures, document their compliance and participate in the improvement process. In particular, this will require employees to regularly and reliably fill out documentation and checklists to signify that work has been carried out in accordance with the customer’s specific requirements. Where necessary, training will be provided in these activities.

  • Periodic Review The General Counsel shall periodically review the Procurement Integrity Procedures with OSC personnel in order to ascertain potential areas of exposure to improper influence and to adopt desirable revisions for more effective avoidance of improper influences.

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • Periodic Reviews During January of each year during the term hereof, the Board of Directors of the Company shall review Executive's Annual Salary, bonus, stock options, and additional benefits then being provided to Executive. Following each such review, the Company may in its discretion increase the Annual Salary, bonus, stock options, and benefits; however, the Company shall not decrease such items during the period Executive serves as an employee of the Company. Prior to November 30th of each year during the term hereof, the Board of Directors of the Company shall communicate in writing the results of such review to Executive.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.