Contextualised Admissions Sample Clauses

Contextualised Admissions. 3. We are proud of our leadership of work on contextualised admissions over the last decade, our generous scholarship provision and our outreach programmes. Under the University’s widening participation pledge we welcome applications from students with diverse backgrounds. We are committed to admitting the very best students who demonstrate the potential to benefit from, and contribute to, the academic experience we offer. Equality of opportunity is entrenched in our selection process and we recognise that applicants have different backgrounds and experiences and that not everyone has an equal opportunity to demonstrate their potential with their school or college qualifications alone. It is for this reason that we consider certain data and information in our selection process to help us identify applicants whose academic grades may not be a true reflection of their potential to succeed at university.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Contextualised Admissions. We publish our standard and minimum entry requirements for undergraduate programmes in our University prospectus and on our website. The prospectus includes information presented in simple, clear language and developed in accordance with the ‘Common Language’ guidelines produced by Universities Scotland: xxxxx://xxxxxx.xxxxxx.xxx/qmu-2022-ug- prospectus/06431 89001620143847?short We commit to making offers at the published minimum entry requirements to identified groups where we recognise that a range of factors has influenced attainment. These groups include: • Living in an area of deprivation, as defined by the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD), and in particular, SIMD 20 and SIMD 40. • Care experienced. • Eligible for the Lothian Equal Access Programme for Schools (LEAPS). The following groups are also identified, but as the contextual information is not currently captured in the UCAS application process, we rely on applicants disclosing the information through the personal or referee statement. • Caring responsibilities • Estranged from their family • Armed forces/ex-military veteran. QMU has a very similar percentage of males to females to the national picture (differences of 1%). The data on mature students shows that the gender split is far less pronounced, and the conversion rates are much higher, which may be evidence of the work QMU staff are doing with applicants entering QMU through alternative routes. We will continue to address this issue as part of outcomes set out in our Mainstreaming Report and Equality Outcomes. Sections 6 and 8 of this Agreement describe progress in and our continued commitment to advancing the position of women in Research and through our governance structures.
Contextualised Admissions. The University has employed the use of contextualised admissions for a number of years, with minimum entry requirements published for all degree programmes. However, over the course of 2017/18 significant steps are being taken to enhance the provision of contextualised offers, with immediate impact in 2018, but more substantially, in relation to applicant knowledge, in 2019. Work will shortly be finalised on updating the information, to be published in the 2019 Prospectus, and in turn, published online. New access thresholds are also being developed, which will allow two sets of minimum offers to be published. This will specifically allow easy identification of the offer that those who meet eligible widening access criteria need to meet, setting it aside from standard minimum requirements.
Contextualised Admissions. The University adjusted its contextualised undergraduate admissions policy in 2016 following evaluation that showed previous practice, based on school performance, was not sufficiently effective in improving access for students from lower participation neighbourhoods. As a result, we amended our policy ahead of confirmation and clearing, to take account of an applicant’s neighbourhood in addition to the performance of their school/college to allow a more considered assessment of each application now that this information is available through UCAS. Although introduced late in the cycle, amending our approach has resulted in a very significant improvement in the recruitment of students from low participation neighbourhoods, with a 20% improvement from 4.4% to 5.3% in 16/17. This has enabled us to meet our target. This change in approach has been rolled out to the 2017 cycle and is used as part of our contextualised offer-making strategy which takes into consideration an applicant’s neighbourhood, carer status, extenuating circumstances and if they have attend an access programme. We anticipate the proportion of LPN Q1 students will increase further in 17/18. We are keen to refine our approach in 18/19 to take account of a range of indicators of disadvantage. We have been working with UCAS to define multiple equality measures on which to base a more sophisticated contextualised admissions process going forward, but progress has been slower than expected due to issues relating to access to data. We will continue to work on this approach with the aim of revising our admissions policy for future recruitment cycles.
Contextualised Admissions. 8.2.1 Access is not always about socio-economic deprivation as described by the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation. Barriers to higher education are found in many other forms. This is why the contextual admissions process in place at St Xxxxxxx is not reliant on a single measure but uses multiple access markers to enable us to put into context the achievements of all applicants and assess potential. This contextual admissions process is research-based14 and seeks to ensure that the University employs a more comprehensive and sophisticated understanding of deprivation than SIMD measures alone. Access Codes used for 2016-17 entry applications A1 Student who have been out of education for more than 3 years without ever attending university A2A SWAP access applicant A3 Xxxxxx Trust Summer School applicant A4 Applicant from low progression school X0X Xx Xxxxxxx specific access initiative A6ARC Applicant from an ARC region. Rural Access Project A6 Applicant from SHEP programmes A6R REACH applicants A720 Applicant identified disadvantaged (SIMD20) A740 Applicant identified disadvantaged (SIMD20/40) A7C Applicant has spent time in care
Contextualised Admissions. Our recruitment and admissions strategy is an important element of our commitment to increase applicants and entrants from non-traditional groups. Our Contextual Admissions Policy was developed in 2014, and takes into account the context of an applicant’s academic achievement, giving consideration to a range of factors that may have impacted on attainment. Data from a range of sources informs decision making, including wider contextual data provided by the Scottish Government, UCAS and partner widening participation programmes, and information provided by the applicant. Our contextualised admissions policy is based on the following key principles: • Fairness – we will strive to use admission assessment methods that are reliable and valid. • Transparency – details of our entry requirements will be published in our prospectus and on our website and will be clear and transparent to applicants and their advisers. • Reflect our community – we are committed to admitting as wide a range of applicants as possible to reflect our community. • Encourage participation – we will minimise barriers to applicants and encourage student persistence, progression and retention through our targeted pre-entry and transition support services. The policy ensures that each application received by the University is considered carefully on its own merits, taking into account educational, professional and personal experience. We will continue to identify and share best practice in the use of contextual admissions in a way that supports our aspirations, informs decision-making and encourages more applications from all backgrounds. As noted in Section
Contextualised Admissions. The University welcomes the SFC’s recognition of the importance of using contextual data in admissions. The University of Edinburgh was one of the first in the UK, and the first in Scotland, to use contextual data in admissions, having done so since 2004. We remain at the forefront of developments in contextualised admissions. The University is represented on the National Contextual Data Group chaired by Supporting Professionalism in Admissions (SPA) and is one of 11 case studies in the SPA research reportFair Admissions to Higher Education: the use of contextual data in admissions at a sample of universities and colleges in the UK’ (2012). We recognise that not all applicants have had an equal opportunity to evidence their academic potential. Through our use of contextual data in admissions, we seek to identify those from different social, economic, cultural and educational backgrounds who have the potential to succeed at Edinburgh. The University regularly refines its use of contextual data in admissions on the basis of internal evidence and the findings of UK research. We are currently investigating the potential use in admissions of geodemographic data relating to socio-economic status indicators, including the ACORN, POLAR2 and Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) classifications. This analysis is being carried out in order to inform the potential use of geodemographic data alongside other contextual data already used in the admissions processes at the University of Edinburgh. The timeline for the work is therefore dictated by the admissions cycle. The initial work regarding SIMD will be completed by September 2012, in time for the start of the 2013/14 admissions cycle. Further work on SIMD and ACORN will be done by September 2013, ahead of the 2014/15 admissions cycle. We also work collaboratively to share good practice in this area. For example, the LEAPS partners signed up voluntarily to an admissions pledge in 1995. The LEAPS admissions pledge can be found here: xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx/admissions- pledge.html. We highlight our admissions principles on our website and in our prospectus here xxxx://xxx.xx.xx.xx/studying/undergraduate/applications-admissions/principles and here xxxx://xxx.xx.xx.xx/studying/undergraduate/applications- admissions/selection/select Target groups SIMD20 We are analysing the reasons for SIMD 20 applicants that do not convert. We will develop an evidence base of the reasons behind this (e.g. declining our offe...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Contextualised Admissions. The University has a new contextualised admissions policy (available here) to underpin efforts in this area. It has employed the use of contextualised admissions for a number of years, with minimum entry requirements published for all degree programmes. However, over the course of 2017/18 significant steps are being taken to enhance the provision of contextualised offers, with immediate impact in 2018, but more substantially, in relation to applicant knowledge, in 2019. Work will shortly be finalised on updating the information, to be published in the 2019 Prospectus, and in turn, published online. New access thresholds are also being developed, which will allow two sets of minimum offers to be published. This will specifically allow easy identification of the offer that those who meet eligible widening access criteria need to meet, setting it aside from standard minimum requirements.

Related to Contextualised Admissions

  • Complaints and Feedback 15.3.1 The primary responsibility for receiving feedback and investigating complaints promptly and thoroughly in respect of the Services will rest with the Provider. The Provider will have procedures in place including but not limited to a complaints framework, which are acceptable to the Department, to gather and act upon feedback and complaints from Learners and/or their representatives and employers and the wider community. The Provider must also keep a log of the complaints received which will be accessible to the Department upon request.

  • Errors, Questions, and Complaints a. In case of errors or questions about your transactions, you should as soon as possible contact us as set forth in Section 6 of the General Terms above.

  • Third Party Billing If, prior to the Effective Date or at any time during the term of this IA LFAC contracts with a third party billing company to submit claims to the Federal health care programs on behalf of LFAC, LFAC must certify to OIG that he or it does not have an ownership or control interest (as defined in 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-3(a)(3)) in the third party billing company and is not employed by, and does not act as a consultant to, the third party billing company. LFAC also shall obtain (as applicable) a certification from any third party billing company that the company: (i) has a policy of not employing any person who is excluded from participation in any Federal health care program to perform any duties related directly or indirectly to the preparation or submission of claims to Federal health care programs; (ii) screens its prospective and current employees against the Exclusion List; and (iii) provides training in the applicable requirements of the Federal health care programs to those employees involved in the preparation and submission of claims to Federal health care programs. If applicable, a copy of these certifications shall be included in LFAC’s Implementation Report and each Annual Report required by Section V below.

  • Feedback and Complaints 34.1. The primary responsibility for receiving feedback and investigating complaints promptly and thoroughly in respect of the Services shall rest with the Contractor. The Contractor shall have procedures in place, which are acceptable to the ESFA, to gather and act upon feedback and complaints from Learners and/or their representatives and employers and the wider community.

  • Suggestions and Feedback If you provide us with any suggestions, feedback or input (“Customer Input”) related to our Services, we (and our corporate group entities) will own all right, title and interest in and to the Customer Input, even if you have designated the Customer Input as confidential. We and our corporate group entities will be entitled to use the Customer Input without restriction. You assign to us all right, title and interest in and to the Customer Input and agree to provide us with any assistance we may require to document, perfect and maintain our rights in the Customer Input. For this purpose the word: “assign” is legal term which means legally transferring the benefit, such as you legally transferring the benefit of the Customer Input to us.

  • Technical or Contractual Problems Contractor shall meet with the Department's personnel, or designated representatives, to resolve technical or contractual problems occurring during the contract term or to discuss the progress made by Contractor and the Department in the performance of their respective obligations, at no additional cost to the Department. The Department may request the meetings as problems arise and will be coordinated by the Department. The Department shall provide Contractor a minimum of three full working days notice of meeting date, time, and location. Face-to-face meetings are desired; however, at Contractor's option and expense, a conference call meeting may be substituted. Contractor’s consistent failure to participate in problem resolution meetings, Contractor missing or rescheduling two consecutive meetings, or Contractor’s failure to make a good faith effort to resolve problems may result in termination of the contract.

  • ROYALTIES AND FEES FOR TECHNICAL SERVICES 1. Royalties and fees for technical services arising in a Contracting State and paid to a resident of the other Contracting State may be taxed in that other State.

  • Research Questions The study addresses the following questions.

  • Reviewing your bill (a) If you disagree with the amount you have been charged, you can ask us to review your bill in accordance with our standard complaints and dispute resolution procedures.

  • Notice and contest of claims In the event that either Party receives a claim or demand from a third party in respect of which it is entitled to the benefit of an indemnity under this Article 38 (the "Indemnified Party") it shall notify the other Party (the "Indemnifying Party") within 15 (fifteen) days of receipt of the claim or demand and shall not settle or pay the claim without the prior approval of the Indemnifying Party, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. In the event that the Indemnifying Party wishes to contest or dispute the claim or demand, it may conduct the proceedings in the name of the Indemnified Party, subject to the Indemnified Party being secured against any costs involved, to its reasonable satisfaction.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.