Conducting Evaluations Sample Clauses

Conducting Evaluations. 13.1.1 The University retains the right to evaluate adjunct professors, including use of student and/or administrative evaluations.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (6)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Conducting Evaluations. Evaluations shall be conducted in accordance with established District protocols.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
Conducting Evaluations. The performance of a Unit B Member shall be observed openly and with the full knowledge of the Unit B Member. No adverse comments shall be made to a Unit B Member in the presence of pupils, parents or other non-Unit B Members. Any issues, concerns, or opportunities for improvement shall be brought to the attention [verbally] of the Unit B Member within a reasonable time. APPENDIX “B” UNIT B TIMELINE Unit B Members will be evaluated every year. All Unit B administrators will have four goals as part of their evaluation. The Management/Operations standard (2) may be substituted with the teaching All Students Standard (2) according to the State Evaluation Rubric. If needed, can be discussed at goals meetings. • By September 30 – Unit B Members will be informed about the Evaluation Procedure. • By October 31 – Goals meeting based on Individual Professional Development Plan (IPDP) and School and District Improvement Plans will occur. • By February 15– Mid-year goals’ meetings will be held. • By the June 15– Year end goals’ meetings will be held. • By the June 30 – Final evaluation narratives will be completed by evaluators. Important Terms Final Evaluation – A narrative, written by the evaluator, discussing the Unit B Members annual performance in light of specific goals. Goals’ Meetings – Meetings held at the beginning, middle, and end of the school year for the purpose of Unit B Members and evaluators determining, discussing, and monitoring annual goals Individual Professional Development Plan (IPDP) – A plan developed by Unit B Members, monitored by administrators, and required by the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education for professional development planning, certification, and licensure. Specific, Measureable, Attainable, Realistic, Timely (XXXXX) Goals – Characteristics of the annual goals developed by teachers. Teachers with Non-professional Status – Teachers who have worked in the Xxxxxxx-Xxxxxx Regional School District for a period of time less than three complete school years with each school year of employment beginning on the first day of school for teachers and ending on the last day of school. APPENDIX “C” UNIT A SALARY SCHEDULES
Sample 1
Conducting Evaluations. 1. Non-Probationary ESP’s shall be given a minimum of one written evaluation to be conducted biannually.
Sample 1
Conducting Evaluations. Project Manager per day/per hour Senior Evaluator/Team leader per day Evaluation Specialist per day Subject matter expert (Education, Health, etc) per day Data collectors/field workers per day Type of service Method of pricing Price in USD Translators per page Quality assurace support per hour Editorial support per page/per hour Graphic designer (if applicable) per day
Sample 1
Conducting Evaluations. The performance of a Unit B Member shall be observed openly and with the full knowledge of the Unit B Member. No adverse comments shall be made to a Unit B Member in the presence of pupils, parents or other non-Unit B Members. Any issues, concerns, or opportunities for improvement shall be brought to the attention [verbally] of the Unit B Member within a reasonable time. APPENDIX “B” UNIT B TIMELINE Unit B Members will be evaluated every year. All Unit B administrators will have four goals as part of their evaluation. The Management/Operations standard (2) may be substituted with the teaching All Students Standard
Sample 1

Related to Conducting Evaluations

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • Student Evaluations Student evaluations shall be completed by the end of the 12th week of the fall semester.

  • TEACHER EVALUATIONS A. Each teacher shall have the right, upon request, to review the contents of his/her personal file folder.

  • Focused Evaluation The Focused Evaluation is used when a teacher is not evaluated using the Comprehensive Evaluation process, and will include evaluation of one of the eight state criteria (student growth impact required). If a non-provisional teacher has scored at Proficient or higher the previous year, they may be moved to Focused Evaluation. The teacher may remain on the Focused Evaluation for five (5) years before returning to the Comprehensive Evaluation. The teacher or the evaluator can initiate a move from the Focused to the Comprehensive Evaluation. A decision to move a teacher from a Focused to a Comprehensive Evaluation must occur by December 15.

  • Formal Evaluations The employer shall undertake formal evaluations of an employee’s performance of the various duties and responsibilities of a position only if one or more of the following conditions is present: • employee request • mutual agreement of hiring unit and employee • recommendation arising from informal evaluation • decision of Chair, Xxxx, Director or designate resulting from the processing of a complaint in accordance with Article 8.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and xxxx them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. No response TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Yes - No Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Self-Evaluation Each regular faculty member shall provide a self-evaluation. It shall address, among other items, the faculty member's fulfillment of professional responsibilities as referenced in Section 18.2.3 and an assessment of his or her own performance. The faculty member will share the self-evaluation with the Faculty Evaluation Committee and the first-level manager or designee. The self-evaluation will become part of the evaluation report.

  • Project Monitoring Reporting Evaluation A. The Project Implementing Entity shall monitor and evaluate the progress of its activities under the Project and prepare Project Reports in accordance with the provisions of Section 5.08(b) of the General Conditions and on the basis of indicators agreed with the Bank. Each such report shall cover the period of one

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.