Conclusions and actions Sample Clauses

Conclusions and actions. Based on the above rationale, all Regulatory Authorities request an amendment to the CRIDA proposal. This amendment should contain the following elements:
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Conclusions and actions. Based on the above rationale, all Regulatory Authorities request an amendment to the CRIDA proposal. This amendment should contain the following elements: - Some elements regarding the principle that the recalculated capacity should be allocated first during an auction in order to allow for an efficient pricing (point III.4 of this RfA) ; - an adaptation of the geographical scope of the CRIDA proposal (ie: the Italy-Switzerland border shall not be part of this proposal) ; - an alignment when necessary of the CRIDA proposal with the IDCZCP one, notably regarding the timings of the intraday auctions ; - some details within the CRIDA proposal regarding the gate opening time for bid submission as well as the deadline for bid submission for each CRIDA ; - an implementation timeline adapted/revised, which specifies notably that the launch of SIDC within Italy and the borders of the LIP 14 is a prerequisite to the launch of the CRIDA proposal at the bidding zone borders concerned (regarding the Greece/Italy border, as the SIDC implementation to this bidding zone border is not yet planned, the concerned NRAs consider that the CRIDA auctions, even though they should complement the continuous trading, could be implemented before the SIDC is extended to this border ; - allowance the SIDC for all the MTUs of the day, independently of the number of CRIDA auctions proposed in the methodology ; - a limitation of the interruption of the SIDC of 10 minutes max as foreseen in the Article 63(2) of the CACM Regulation or a justification of any deviation to these 10 min max interruption (accompanied with the incompressible timings and with a roadmap to stick at the 10 minutes interruption) ; - some precisions regarding what an interruption of the SIDC coupling means. The concerned NRAs want to be sure that only the available transmission capacity (ATC) of the borders participating to the CRIDA will be set at 0 in the XBID capacity management module during each CRIDA (but that internal trades or cross border trades on other bidding zones border remain possible) ; - the possibility for the concerned NEMOs and TSOs to envisage a third auction at the Italian borders, around the IDCZGOT following Article 59 of CACM Regulation, which is set at 15:00 D-1 (and the consequent potential split of the CRIDA proposal depending on the bidding zone borders willing to participate to this optional auction). Concerned NRAs would expect such auction to be operative at least on the Greece/Italy, ...
Sample 1
Conclusions and actions. Based on the above rationale, concerned Regulatory Authorities request an amendment to the CRIDA proposal. This amendment should contain the following elements: - The proposal shall be adapted, addressing only the Italy North region. Moreover, NEMOs and TSOs are requested to split the proposal into sub-regions that are homogeneous compared to the contents of the proposal; - an alignment of the CRIDA proposal with the ACER decision on IDCZCP, notably regarding the timings of the intraday pan-European mandatory auctions; - The concerned NRAs request that only the available transmission capacity of the bidding zone borders participating in the CRIDA will be set to zero in the XBID CMM during each CRIDA. Cross-zonal capacity on bidding zone borders not involved in the CRIDA can be allocated by XBID and the continuous trading within the bidding zones that are not involved in the auction and shall not be interrupted. Interruption of the continuous trading within the bidding zones involved in the CRIDA may be considered, according to the national market rules; - NRAs request the concerned NEMOs and TSOs to allow the SIDC for all the MTUs of the day, independently of the number of CRIDA auctions proposed in the methodology. This provision shall be included in the proposal; - The timescale for implementation of the methodology shall be made contingent to pre- requisites, depending on the specific bidding zone borders, as presented under point 4;
Sample 1
Conclusions and actions. On 16 August 2018, the members of CERRF did not reach a unanimous agreement to either approve the proposals, to request the Agency to extend the deadline for decision or to request the Agency to adopt a decision on the amended Core DA and ID CCM proposals pursuant to Article 21 et seqq. of the CACM Regulation. In that case, the Rules of Procedure of CERRF require the CERRF Chair to refer the decision to the Agency – in accordance with Article 9(12) of the CACM Regulation – on behalf of the Core NRAs. Nevertheless, Core NRAs agree to provide this non-paper to the Agency to give an indepth view on common and on dissenting opinions of Core NRAs to contribute to the letter by the CERRF Chair. Core NRAs anticipate that the Agency will, when adopting its decision, give utmost consideration on Core NRAs’ and Core TSOs assessment of all elements of the amended proposals for DA and ID CCM, especially those that were identified and presented in this paper. Core NRAs are ready to assist the Agency to develop and adopt its decision and would highly welcome the set-up of a dedicated taskforce to facilitate a continuous exchange between NRAs and the Agency throughout the decision process. Based on the above rationale, NRAs agree that the amended proposals for the DA and ID CCM do not meet all requirements of the CACM Regulation, are far from being enforceable and as such cannot be approved by all Core NRAs. Summarizing the above, the proposals still do not contain:  detailed, consistent and fully CACM-compliant descriptions (see points raised in this document)
Sample 1
Conclusions and actions. All relevant Regulatory Authorities have assessed, consulted and closely cooperated to reach an agreement on the CRIDA proposal. On 13 May 2019 the Italy North NRAs agreed that the CRIDA proposal attached to the present paper meets the requirements of Regulation 2015/1222 and as such can be approved.
Sample 1
Conclusions and actions. All relevant Regulatory Authorities have assessed, consulted and closely cooperated to reach an agreement on the CRIDA proposal. On 18 April 2019, the Greece-Italy NRAs agreed that the CRIDA proposal meets the requirements of Regulation 2015/1222 and as such can be approved. On the basis of this agreement each Regulatory Authorities will subsequently adopt a decision to approve the CRIDA proposal by 19 April 2019. The CRIDA proposal shall be subject to an amendment at a later stage once more details are available and this amendment shall be initiated by the concerned NEMOs and TSOs following Art. 9(13) of CACM Regulation.
Sample 1

Related to Conclusions and actions

  • Conclusions and Recommendations The demonstration and evaluation process provided an opportunity to test community specific tools with a range of end users from the memory institution domain and to gain greater insight into both the current and future evolution of the SHAMAN prototypes for preservation, access and re-use. Xxxx et al. (2000) in their user evaluation study of the Alexandria Digital Library which incorporated the evaluation of a Web prototype by earth scientists, information specialists and educators raised four key questions in relation to their findings that SHAMAN may be well advised to consider, they are paraphrased here with our conclusions from the investigations. What have we learned about our target organizations and potential users?  Memory institutions are most definitely not a homogenised group; their needs and requirements differ greatly across the domain.  Representatives of the archives community are agreed on the benefits of SHAMAN‟s authenticity validation function.  The representatives of government information services remained unconvinced as to the need or benefit of grid technologies or distributed ingest while librarians saw the value of grid access as an asset of the framework. What have we learned about the evaluation approach for digital preservation?  Within the limits of the exercise, in terms of time-frame and resources, the approach adopted has generated useful information for the further development of demonstrators and for the development of the SHAMAN framework overall. What have we learned about the SHAMAN ISP1 demonstrator?  Respondents to the evaluation questionnaires and the focus groups indicate that, overall, the presentation of the demonstrator worked effectively and that, in general, participants in the demonstration and evaluation events were able to understand the intentions of the demonstration and to apply the ideas presented to their own context. What have we learned about the applicability of the SHAMAN framework to memory institutions?  Respondents to the questionnaires and participants in the focus groups readily identified the value of the SHAMAN framework to their own operations. The majority had not yet established a long-term digital preservation policy, but recognized the need. Generally, the concepts of distributed ingest and grid operations found favour.  Virtually all practitioners in the focus groups, however, drew attention to need of a lower level demonstration that would be closer to their everyday preservation troubles, especially for digital preservation to be applied to non-textual materials, such as film, photographs and sound archives. In addition to the criteria suggested by Xxxx et al., we can add a further project-related question: What have we learned that has implications for the training and dissemination phase of the Project?  It was not part of the remit of the demonstration and evaluation specifically to discover information of relevance to the training and dissemination function. However, a number of factors will affect the efficacy of any training programme in particular. o First, no common understanding of digital preservation can be assumed of the potential target audiences for training. Consequently, it is likely that self-paced learning materials will be most effective in presenting the SHAMAN framework. o Secondly, the aims of SHAMAN as a project must be conveyed clearly: specifically, that it is a kind of „proof-of-concept‟ project and is not intended to deliver a package of programs capable of being implemented by institutions. o Thirdly, it needs to be emphasised that the SHAMAN framework is not limited to text documents; it can be applied to materials of all kinds. However, the demonstrations relate to bodies of material that were actually available for use. o Fourthly, the existing presentation materials are capable of being adapted for use in training activities. o Finally, the target audiences will appreciate the possibility of online access to the demonstrator, which will need to have very great ease of access in order that people with diverse backgrounds are able to use it with equal facility. We believe that, overall, WP14 has met its aims and objectives in this demonstration and evaluation of ISP1. Valuable lessons have been learnt by all parties involved, which will be transferred to the evaluation of ISP2 in the coming months.

  • Certifications and Audits Company shall promptly complete and return to BNYM any certifications which BNYM in its sole discretion may from time to time send to Company, certifying that Company is using the Licensed System in strict compliance with the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. BNYM may, at its expense and after giving reasonable advance written notice to Company, enter Company locations during normal business hours and audit Company’s utilization of the Licensed System, the number of copies of the Documentation in Company’s possession, and the scope of use and information pertaining to Company’s compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. The foregoing right may be exercised directly by BNYM or by delegation to an independent auditor acting on its behalf. If BNYM discovers that there is any unauthorized scope of use or that Company is not in compliance with the aforementioned provisions, Company shall reimburse BNYM for the full costs incurred in conducting the audit.

  • EXCLUSIONS AND EXCEPTIONS 12.1 DBS shall not be responsible or liable to the Cardmember or any Cardholder for any loss or damage incurred or suffered as a consequence of:

  • REVISIONS AND AMENDMENTS Any revisions or amendments to this Agreement must be made in writing and signed by both parties.

  • Exceptions to Informal Negotiations and Arbitration The Parties agree that the following Disputes are not subject to the above provisions concerning informal negotiations and binding arbitration: (a) any Disputes seeking to enforce or protect, or concerning the validity of, any of the intellectual property rights of a Party; (b) any Dispute related to, or arising from, allegations of theft, piracy, invasion of privacy, or unauthorized use; and (c) any claim for injunctive relief. If this provision is found to be illegal or unenforceable, then neither Party will elect to arbitrate any Dispute falling within that portion of this provision found to be illegal or unenforceable and such Dispute shall be decided by a court of competent jurisdiction within the courts listed for jurisdiction above, and the Parties agree to submit to the personal jurisdiction of that court. CORRECTIONS There may be information on the Site that contains typographical errors, inaccuracies, or omissions, including descriptions, pricing, availability, and various other information. We reserve the right to correct any errors, inaccuracies, or omissions and to change or update the information on the Site at any time, without prior notice.

  • PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS AND ASSIGNMENTS (In 2011, the Florida Legislature passed statutory changes eliminating the granting of new Professional Service Contracts and prohibiting the School Board from following the requirements outlined in Sections 14.1, 14.1-1, 14.1-2, and 14.1-3 of the contract below. These provisions are therefore placed in abeyance until all legal challenges have been resolved. All other Sections beginning with 14.2 remain in full force and effect.)

  • - ISSUE IDENTIFICATION AND INFORMAL DISCUSSION The employee shall discuss the issue with the immediate supervisor on an informal basis to identify and attempt resolution of the employee’s issue within ten (10) business days following the day the issue arose. The employee shall have the affirmative responsibility to inform the supervisor that the issue is being raised pursuant to this grievance procedure. The immediate supervisor shall meet with the employee, secure clarification of the issue, consider the employee’s proposed solution, and discuss possible alternative solutions and/or other administrative remedies. The immediate supervisor shall inform the department’s personnel office, and the personnel director shall inform the union of the grievance. The immediate supervisor shall respond verbally within ten (10) business days following the meeting with the employee. Failure of the supervisor to respond within the time limit shall entitle the employee to process the issue to the next step.

  • Determinations and Actions by the Board of Directors All actions, calculations and determinations (including all omissions with respect to the foregoing) which are done or made by the Board of Directors in good faith pursuant to this Agreement, shall not subject the Board of Directors to any liability to the holders of the Rights.

  • Third-Party Certifications and Audits Upon Customer’s written request at reasonable intervals, and subject to the confidentiality obligations set forth in the Agreement and this DPA, Data Processor shall make available to Customer (or Customer’s independent, third-party auditor that is not a competitor of Data Processor) a copy of Data Processor’s then most recent third-party audits or certifications, as applicable (provided, however, that such audits, certifications and the results therefrom, including the documents reflecting the outcome of the audit and/or the certifications, shall only be used by Customer to assess compliance with this DPA and/or with applicable Data Protection Laws and Regulations, and shall not be used for any other purpose or disclosed to any third party without Data Processor’s prior written approval and, upon Data Processor's first request, Customer shall return all records or documentation in Customer's possession or control provided by Data Processor in the context of the audit and/or the certification). With respect to audits and inspections, the parties shall discuss in good faith and agree on the scope, timing and details of the audits and inspections. To the extent that Data Processor’s obligations in this section involve more than 8 hours/man of work, Customer shall bear the costs and expenses of complying with this clause.

  • Conclusion and Recommendations D. Evaluations for Offenders without a sex offense conviction shall answer the following additional referral questions in the evaluations:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.