Conclusion of the Evaluation Sample Clauses

Conclusion of the Evaluation. A copy of all final signed evaluation documents shall be given to the unit member, and a copy shall be placed in the unit member's personnel file, excluding any student evaluations, by no later than the last day of the academic semester in which the evaluation took place. The unit member and the administrative evaluator may extend this deadline by mutual consent. In the event the unit member being evaluated receives what s/he considers to be a negative evaluation, the evaluation team and the unit member shall discuss the matter at the post-observation conference. The administrative evaluator shall specify on the evaluation form the reasons for the alleged deficiencies. The administrative evaluator and the unit member shall meet within fifteen (15) workdays of the post-observation conference to develop a written, detailed plan for remediation of the deficiencies upon which the negative evaluation was based. All documents placed into the unit member’s personnel file must follow the policies and procedures of this article and of Article 3 of this agreement.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (6)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Conclusion of the Evaluation. A copy of all final signed evaluation documents shall be given to the unit member, and a copy shall be placed in the unit member's personnel file, excluding any student evaluations, by no later than the last day of the academic semester in which the evaluation took place. The unit member and the administrative evaluator may extend this deadline by mutual consent. All documents placed into the unit member’s personnel file must follow the policies and procedures of this article and of Article 3 of this agreement.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
Conclusion of the Evaluation. A copy of all final signed evaluation documents shall be given to the unit member, and a copy shall be placed in the unit member's personnel file, excluding any student evaluations, within one week of the final evaluation conference. The unit member and the administrative evaluator may extend this deadline by mutual consent. In the event the unit member being evaluated receives what s/he considers to be a negative evaluation; the administrative evaluator and the unit member shall discuss the matter at the final evaluation conference. The administrative evaluator shall document on the evaluation form the specific reasons for any rating of needs improvement or unsatisfactory. A unit member may submit to the appropriate Vice-President a written response to his/her evaluation. The written response shall be attached to the evaluation and included in his/her personnel file. The unit member may, but is not required to, submit the written response to one or both of the evaluators or the area xxxx. The administrative evaluator and the unit member shall meet within the first four weeks of the following semester to develop a written, detailed plan for remediation of the deficiencies upon which the negative evaluation was based (form Q). All documents placed into the unit member’s personnel file must follow the policies and procedures of this article and of Article 3 of this agreement.
Sample 1Sample 2
Conclusion of the Evaluation. 1. After the conclusion of the financial evaluation, the Competent Body shall proceed to establish the final ranking of Tenders in decreasing order of their final xxxx: L = Τ * 80% + C * 20% where: Τ = the Technical Offer evaluation xxxx, and C = the relative cost of the Financial Offer.
Sample 1
Conclusion of the Evaluation. A copy of all final signed evaluation documents shall be given to the unit member, and a copy shall be placed in the unit member's personnel file, excluding any student evaluations, within one week of the final evaluation conference. The unit member and the administrative evaluator may extend this deadline by mutual consent. In the event the unit member evaluated receives what they consider to be a negative evaluation; the administrative evaluator and the unit member shall discuss the matter at the final evaluation conference. The administrative evaluator shall document on the evaluation form the specific reasons for any rating of needs improvement or unsatisfactory. A unit member may submit to the appropriate Vice-President a written response to their evaluation. The written response shall be attached to the evaluation and included in their personnel file. The unit member may, but is not required to, submit the written response to one or both of the evaluators or the area xxxx. The administrative evaluator and the unit member shall meet within the first four weeks of the following semester to develop a written, detailed plan for remediation of the deficiencies upon which the negative evaluation was based (form Q). All completed and signed evaluations and written responses will be forwarded to Human Resources for tracking, scheduling, and filing. All documents placed into the unit member’s personnel file must follow the policies and procedures of this article and of Article 3 of this agreement.
Sample 1
Conclusion of the Evaluation. A copy of all final signed evaluation documents shall be given to the unit member, and a copy shall be placed in the unit member's personnel file, excluding any student evaluations, within one week of the final evaluation conference by no later than the last day of the academic semester in which the evaluation took place. The unit member and the administrative evaluator may extend this deadline by mutual consent. In the event the unit member being evaluated receives what s/he considers to be a negative evaluation; the administrative evaluator evaluation team and the unit member shall discuss the matter at the final evaluation post-observation conference. The administrative evaluator shall document specify on the evaluation form the specific reasons for any rating of needs improvement or unsatisfactory the alleged deficiencies. A unit member may submit to the appropriate Vice-President a written response to his/her evaluation. The written response shall be attached to the evaluation and included in his/her personnel file. The unit member may, but is not required to, submit the written response to one or both of the evaluators or the area xxxx. The administrative evaluator and the unit member shall meet within the first four weeks of the following semester fifteen (15) workdays of the post-observation conference to develop a written, detailed plan for remediation of the deficiencies upon which the negative evaluation was based (form Q). All documents placed into the unit member’s personnel file must follow the policies and procedures of this article and of Article 3 of this agreement.
Sample 1

Related to Conclusion of the Evaluation

  • Response to Evaluation The teacher shall have the right to make a written response to the evaluation and to have it attached to the evaluation report to be placed in the teacher's personnel file. A copy, signed by both parties, shall be provided to the teacher.

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • Re-evaluation a) When a job has moved to a higher group as a result of re-evaluation, the resulting rate shall be retroactive from the date that Management or the employee has applied to the Plant Job Review Committee for re-evaluation.

  • Written Evaluation The Superintendent in consultation with the Board shall review and assess the Administrator’s performance on or before February 1 of each year. The Administrator shall be formally evaluated in writing annually by the Superintendent on or before February 1 of each year. The evaluation shall include a description of the Administrator’s duties and responsibilities and the standards to which the Administrator is to perform. It shall consider the Administrator’s specific duties, responsibilities, management and competence as an Administrator; specify the Administrator’s strengths and weaknesses with supporting reasons; align with research based standards established by the Illinois State Board of Education and use data and indicators on student growth as a significant factor in rating performance. The evaluation shall also consist of a review of the Administrator’s progress toward meeting established professional, student performance and academic goals set forth in Appendix A and a review of the Administrator’s leadership and management performance relative to his current assignment. The written evaluation shall be signed by both the Superintendent and the Administrator. The Administrator may respond to the evaluation in writing and such response shall be attached to and included in the Administrator’s personnel file.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and xxxx them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. No response TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Yes - No Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • Evaluation of Tenders 33.1 The Procuring Entity shall use the criteria and methodologies listed in this ITT and Section III, Evaluation and Qualification criteria. No other evaluation criteria or methodologies shall be permitted. By applying the criteria and methodologies, the Procuring Entity shall determine the Lowest Evaluated Tender. This is the Tender of the Tenderer that meets the qualification criteria and whose Tender has been determined to be:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.