Concerns to be Addressed Sample Clauses

Concerns to be Addressed. The power peaking operation of the Cabinet Gorge and Noxon Rapids Projects have had and will continue to have adverse impacts on native fish populations and their habitat in the river reach between Cabinet Gorge Dam and Lake Pend Oreille. This is particularly true for migratory, native salmonid populations that historically used the Xxxxx Fork River as a travel corridor between Lake Pend Oreille and tributary spawning and rearing habitats located upstream of the dams. Two such species, bull trout and westslope cutthroat trout, have experienced substantial declines in distribution and numbers throughout their range, resulting in the recent Endangered Species Act listing of bull trout as threatened and the current consideration of listing westslope cutthroat trout. Concern for the status of these native salmonids and the effects of the Cabinet Gorge and Noxon Rapids Projects to the river habitat and migratory corridor of the lower Xxxxx Fork River were identified by relicensing participants as significant issues needing to be addressed at the earliest stages of this collaborative relicensing process (see Initial Stage comment letters and various Xxxxx Fork Relicensing Team and Fisheries Work Group Meeting Summaries).
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Concerns to be Addressed. Concern for the status of native salmonids, particularly bull trout and westslope cutthroat trout, and the effects of the Cabinet Gorge and Noxon Rapids Projects to the river habitat and migratory corridor of the lower Xxxxx Fork River, were identified by relicensing participants as significant issues needing to be addressed at the earliest stages of this collaborative relicensing process (see Initial Stage comment letters and various Xxxxx Fork Relicensing Team and Fisheries Work Group Meeting Summaries). In addition, MFWP and several other participants expressed concern about the impacts of the projects to the existing and historical recreational fisheries occurring along the lower Xxxxx Fork River. Lastly, virtually all participants in the relicensing have identified concerns that implemented measures be monitored and evaluated to determine if they are achieving the desired results or whether efforts should be modified or better directed to new or different programs.
Concerns to be Addressed. Prior to the construction of dams on the Xxxxx Fork River, a number of adfluvial (freshwater, migratory fish that spawn and rear in streams but complete maturity and live as adults in lakes) fish species, including bull trout and westslope cutthroat trout, utilized the Xxxxx Fork River as a migratory corridor between Lake Pend Oreille and upstream tributary spawning, nursery, and rearing habitat. Cabinet Gorge and Noxon Rapids dams are impassable barriers that block access to approximately 58 miles of the Xxxxx Fork River and the associated tributaries for adfluvial fish in Lake Pend Oreille. Recently, concern over declines in the range and numbers of both bull trout and westslope cutthroat trout have resulted in the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) listing of bull trout as threatened (pursuant to the Endangered Species Act) throughout the Columbia River watershed, and the currently ongoing consideration of listing the westslope cutthroat trout as well. Fragmentation of historically larger, more interconnected populations, and isolation of the remaining populations due in part to the construction of dams, has been implicated in the decline of bull trout. The continued operation of the Noxon Rapids and Cabinet Gorge Projects, without provisions for fish passage, will continue to isolate adfluvial fish. These concerns are addressed by this PM&E measure through the implementation of a variety of fish passage related programs, focused initially on bull trout and westslope cutthroat trout, that will provide for a comprehensive evaluation of the feasibility, desirability, and the most appropriate and beneficial methodologies for accomplishing fish passage. The PM&E measure provides for an ongoing WWP commitment to fish passage evaluation and programs, and a funding mechanism to provide for the necessary fish passage facilities and programs as they are further defined or as may be identified in the future.
Concerns to be Addressed. Bull trout are a key target resource associated with the relicensing of the Cabinet Gorge and Noxon Rapids Projects. The populations associated with the Lake Pend Oreille - Xxxxx Fork River (LPO-CFR) system have been listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act. The State of Idaho identified the illegal harvest of bull trout in spawning streams as a significant threat to Lake Pend Oreille bull trout with the potential to effectively wipe out the entire spawning run in a stream. They presented evidence to the Fisheries Work Group (FWG), at the June 11-12, 1997, meeting concerning the magnitude of the problem which may range into the “hundreds of fish lost annually,” and requested support for an enhanced law enforcement effort and public education program beyond the limited resources currently available. Without such a program, there is concern that gains realized through other efforts (e.g. fish passage, tributary habitat protection and enhancement, etc.) could be nullified by illegal harvest or habitat disturbances. Given the limited number of natal streams supporting the Lake Pend Oreille bull trout population, the potential loss of any component of that population or even individual fish in some of the smaller spawning runs would represent a significant blow to the goal of maintaining the long-term population health and viability.
Concerns to be Addressed. There appears to be little question the operation of hydroelectric projects has an impact on the indigenous aquatic life inhabiting rivers and streams. The Cabinet Gorge and Noxon Rapids Projects have had and will continue to have impacts to stream and riverine habitats and the indigenous aquatic life that inhabit them (Beak 1997, 1998a, 1998b; Lang 1997). Concerns were expressed early on in the consultation process that Washington Water Power (WWP) should attempt to eliminate, minimize, or mitigate for these impacts, and this measure was one of those sponsored by the Fisheries Work Group (FWG) to help meet these objectives.
Concerns to be Addressed. Excessive nutrient levels and the resulting productivity enrichment problems have been reported as significant water quality concerns in the Xxxxx Fork River (Xxxxxx 1992, USEPA 1992). However, these concerns are most acute in the upper portions of the river, and due to dilution by tributary inflow and other factors, nutrient concentrations in the lower Xxxxx Fork River are generally low and algae blooms are uncommon (Xxxxxxx and Xxxxxxx 1988; ND&T 1994; WWP 1995, 1996). Heavy metals contamination resulting from extensive mining activities in the headwaters and upper Xxxxx Fork River basin has resulted in establishment of several Superfund sites, although they are located over 100 miles upstream of the Noxon Rapids and Cabinet Gorge Projects. With the focus on these concerns confined largely to the upper basin, relatively little hard data was available on nutrient and metals conditions in the vicinity of the projects prior to Washington Water Power’s (WWP) recent evaluations. However, earlier conclusions and the results of the recent evaluations have indicated that the two project reservoirs do serve as sediment sinks, and therefore do retain nutrients and metals. The relative effectiveness of the reservoirs to serve in this capacity appears to be highly variable depending on loading and river flow conditions, but at least some benefit through net annual retention is provided by the Projects to Lake Pend Oreille (X. Xxxxxxx, Xxxx, pers. comm. to WRWG). Given the high priority of these concerns in the LPO-CFR system, a better understanding of trends in water quality in project waters, and the influence of the projects on downstream water quality, remains an interest of participants in the relicensing process.
Concerns to be Addressed. This measure will address the concern of whether Xxxxx Reservoir stratification and low oxygen conditions at near-bottom depths are resulting in remobilization of nutrients and/or metals that have accumulated in reservoir sediments. This information will be provided to the Management Committee and appropriate technical committees for further consideration and possible action.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Concerns to be Addressed

  • Notices and Addresses All notices, offers, acceptance and any other acts under this Agreement (except payment) shall be in writing, and shall be sufficiently given if delivered to the addressees in person, by Federal Express or similar overnight next business day delivery, or by facsimile delivery followed by overnight next business day delivery, as follows: The Optionee: Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx 0000 Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxx, XX 00000 Facsimile: (000) 000-0000 The Company: UItraStrip Systems, Inc. 0000 X.X. Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, XX 00000 Attention: Xxxxxxxxxx XxXxxxx Facsimile: (000) 000-0000 or to such other address as either of them, by notice to the other may designate from time to time. The transmission confirmation receipt from the sender’s facsimile machine shall be conclusive evidence of successful facsimile delivery. Time shall be counted to, or from, as the case may be, the delivery in person or by mailing.

  • Notice in Writing and Addressed Notice will be in writing and will be delivered by email, postage-prepaid mail, personal delivery, or fax, and will be addressed to the Province and the Recipient respectively as provided for Schedule “B”, or as either Party later designates to the other by Notice.

  • Notices; Xxxxxxxx’s Physical Address All notices given by Borrower or Lender in connection with this Security Instrument must be in writing.

  • Notices and Change of Address Any required notice regarding this Xxxx XXX will be considered effective when we send it to the intended recipient at the last address that we have in our records. Any notice to be given to us will be considered effective when we actually receive it. You, or the intended recipient, must notify us of any change of address.

  • address Refers to IPv4 or IPv6 addresses without making any distinction between the two. When there is need to make a distinction, IPv4 or IPv6 is used.

  • Notice Addresses A notice, request, direction, consent, waiver or other communication must be addressed to the recipient at its address stated in Schedule B to the Sale and Servicing Agreement, which address the party may change by notifying the other party.

  • Notices and Communications Any legal notice under this Agreement shall be in writing to the other party at such address as the other party may designate from time to time for the receipt of such legal notice and shall be deemed to be received on the earlier of the date actually received or on the fourth day after the postmark if such legal notice is mailed first class postage prepaid. In relation to communications other than legal notices under this Agreement, each party may communicate with and provide information to the other party in whatever medium deemed appropriate. This may include the use of e-mail, the internet or other electronic means, in the place of paper communications.

  • NOTICES AND ADDRESS OF RECORD 13.1. All notices required or made pursuant to this Agreement to be given by the CONTRACTOR to the OWNER shall be in writing and shall be delivered by hand or by United States Postal Service Department, first class mail service, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the following OWNER's address of record: City of Naples 000 Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxx 00000-0000 Attention: Xx. Xxxxxx X. Lee, City Manager

  • IP Addresses Authorized Users shall be identified and authenticated by the use of Internet Protocol ("IP") addresses provided by the Licensee to the Distributor. The use of proxy servers by the Licensee or the Participating Institutions is authorized as long as any proxy server IP addresses provided limit remote or off- campus access to the Authorized Users. Authorized IP Addresses are listed in Appendix C. An updated list will be sent to the Distributor on an annual or as- needed basis without the need to amend this Agreement. Alternatively, if the Publisher is utilizing its own and/or third-party system for IP range change notification (such as e.g. IP Registry), then an updated list may be sent via such system instead. The Distributor shall ensure that the Publisher shall use reasonable efforts to cooperate with the Participating Institutions in the implementation of new authentication protocols and procedures (such as Shibboleth) as they are developed during the term of this Agreement. Both the Licensee and the Distributor will provide cooperation to coordinate or facilitate this process but they will not be liable for correct implementation of such authentication protocols and procedures (which remain the full responsibility of the Publisher and the respective Participating Institution).

  • REPRESENTATIVE; ADDRESSES 6.01. The Recipient’s Representative is the Minister of Finance.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.