Computational Overhead Analysis Sample Clauses

Computational Overhead Analysis. In this subsection, we analyze the computational overheads in terms of time taken for each step in the protocol run. To facilitate the evaluation of computation costs, we use a scale provided by Wu et al. [42]. They provided computation costs for a symmetric key operation (Th), an asymmetric key operation (TA), and an ECC point multiplication (TE) as 0.0000328 ms, 0.0214835 ms and 0.427576 ms, respectively. Although we used two fuzzy commitment functions in IoTMAKA, we consider them as the same as the hash function because of their similar nature. Table 4 and Figure 5 (a) show the computational cost comparisons of IoTMAKA and the related four protocols. Results from Table 4 show that IoTMAKA is more efficient than the protocols of Xxxx et al; Jiang et al; and Li et al. He et al.’s protocol is slightly more efficient than IoTMAKA but their protocol lacks many functional features as shown in Table 3. He et al.’s protocol is also vulnerable to many attacks. IoTMAKA keeps the efficiency of computations by reducing computational overheads by 25% on average and achieves most functional, security, and privacy features.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Computational Overhead Analysis. In this subsection, we analyze the computational overheads in terms of time taken for each step in the protocol run. To facilitate the evaluation of computation costs, we use a scale provided by Xxxxx et al. [2]. They provided computation costs as in Table 3 .Table 4 shows the computational cost comparisons of M2MAKA-FS and the related protocols. Results from Table 4 show that M2MAKA-FS is more efficient than Shuai et al.’s protocol and Li et al.’s protocol. Kapito et al.’s protocol is slightly more efficient than M2MAKA-FS but their protocol lacks SK agreement with FS feature which is very important in IoT environment. Although two protocols of Xxxxx et al. and Xxxx et al. are very efficient in computation cost, their protocols lack the security and privacy features as explained inTable 2. Xxxx et al.’s protocol does not provide anonymity and unlinkability and is also not resistant to various attacks whereas Xxxxx et al.’s protocol does not provide unlinkability.
Sample 1

Related to Computational Overhead Analysis

  • DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS The goal of this task is to collect operational data from the project, to analyze that data for economic and environmental impacts, and to include the data and analysis in the Final Report. Formulas will be provided for calculations. A Final Report data collection template will be provided by the Energy Commission. The Recipient shall: • Develop data collection test plan. • Troubleshoot any issues identified. • Collect data, information, and analysis and develop a Final Report which includes: o Total gross project costs. o Length of time from award of bus(es) to project completion. o Fuel usage before and after the project.

  • COMPENSATION ANALYSIS After the expiration of the second (2nd) Renewal Term of this Agreement, if any, a Compensation Analysis may be performed. At such time, based on the reported Total Gross Revenue, performance of the Concession, and/or Department’s existing rates for similarly- performing operations, Department may choose to increase the Concession Payment for the following Renewal Term(s), if any.

  • Financial Statement Audit If, during its fiscal year, Grantee expends less than $750,000 in Federal Awards, Grantee is subject to the following audit requirements:

  • Statistical Analysis 31 F-tests and t-tests will be used to analyze OV and Quality Acceptance data. The F-test is a 32 comparison of variances to determine if the OV and Quality Acceptance population variances 33 are equal. The t-test is a comparison of means to determine if the OV and Quality Acceptance 34 population means are equal. In addition to these two types of analyses, independent verification 35 and observation verification will also be used to validate the Quality Acceptance test results.

  • Financial Conditions Section 4.01. (a) The Recipient shall maintain or cause to be maintained a financial management system, including records and accounts, and prepare financial statements in a format acceptable to the Bank, adequate to reflect the operations, resources and expenditures in respect of the Project and each Sub-project (including its cost and the benefits to be derived from it).

  • Budget Narrative Services are strictly paid as cost reimbursement. No funds will be paid for services not provided.

  • Financial Condition There shall have been no material adverse change, as determined by Bank, in the financial condition or business of Borrower, nor any material decline, as determined by Bank, in the market value of any collateral required hereunder or a substantial or material portion of the assets of Borrower.

  • Pro Forma Statement The Receiver, as soon as practicable after Bank Closing, in accordance with the best information then available, shall provide to the Assuming Institution a pro forma statement reflecting any adjustments of such liabilities and assets as may be necessary. Such pro forma statement shall take into account, to the extent possible, (i) liabilities and assets of a nature similar to those contemplated by Section 2.1 or Section 3.1, respectively, which at Bank Closing were carried in the Failed Bank's suspense accounts, (ii) accruals as of Bank Closing for all income related to the assets and business of the Failed Bank acquired by the Assuming Institution hereunder, whether or not such accruals were reflected on the Accounting Records of the Failed Bank in the normal course of its operations, and (iii) adjustments to determine the Book Value of any investment in an Acquired Subsidiary and related accounts on the "bank only" (unconsolidated) balance sheet of the Failed Bank based on the equity method of accounting, whether or not the Failed Bank used the equity method of accounting for investments in subsidiaries, except that the resulting amount cannot be less than the Acquired Subsidiary's recorded equity as of Bank Closing as reflected on the Accounting Records of the Acquired Subsidiary. Any Loan purchased by the Assuming Institution pursuant to Section 3.1 which the Failed Bank charged off during the period beginning the day after the Bid Valuation Date to the date of Bank Closing shall be deemed not to be charged off for the purposes of the pro forma statement, and the purchase price shall be determined pursuant to Section 3.2.

  • Background and Narrative of Budget Reductions 2. Assumptions Used in the Deficit Reduction Plan: - EBF and Estimated New Tier Funding: - Equal Assessed Valuation and Tax Rates: - Employee Salaries and Benefits: - Short and Long Term Borrowing: - Educational Impact: - Other Assumptions: - Has the district considered shared services or outsourcing (Ex: Transportation, Insurance) If yes please explain: ESTIMATED LIMITATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS (School Districts Only) (For Local Use Only)

  • Mileage Measurement Where required, the mileage measurement for LIS rate elements is determined in the same manner as the mileage measurement for V&H methodology as outlined in NECA Tariff No. 4.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.