Competed Services Award Criteria Sample Clauses

Competed Services Award Criteria. Lot Number Criterion
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Competed Services Award Criteria. This Framework provides for the option for using Further Competition by applying the following sub-criteria. The percentages can be set to suit the call-off being undertaken. The questions or method statements used to assess the call-off submissions must be appropriate and proportionate to the contract being procured. Project Methodology % Team Being Proposed for the Contract Delivery % Price % To be set by customer conducting Further Competition SCHEDULE 3 PRICING MATRICES Refer to 5 Pricing Submission submitted by the Supplier Pricing revisions: The price offered by the Applicant in 5 Pricing Submission must be firm and fixed for the duration of the Framework.
Sample 1
Competed Services Award Criteria. When a Competed Service is ordered the Award Criteria used for Mini-Competition may differ from the Award Criteria used to set up the Framework Agreement, but they have to be derived from the original Award Criteria. The Service Purchaser may use one or more of the Award Criteria shown in the tables below and shall make this Award Criteria and related weightings known to the Provider when a Competed Service is ordered. Criterion Number Award Criteria Sub criteria Percentage Weightings (or rank order of importance where applicable) 1 Delivery to be set by Service Purchaser conducting mini-competition to be set by Service Purchaser conducting mini-competition 2 Social Value to be set by Service Purchaser conducting mini-competition to be set by Service Purchaser conducting mini-competition 3 Quality Assurance to be set by Service Purchaser conducting mini-competition to be set by Service Purchaser conducting mini-competition 4 Technical Merit to be set by Service Purchaser conducting mini-competition to be set by Service Purchaser conducting mini-competition The Service Purchaser can vary the weightings between quality and price to reflect the type of Service being ordered as set out below. The Service Purchaser also has the option of competing solely on the basis of price. Range Percentage Weightings Quality 0-100% to be set by the Service Purchaser conducting mini- competition Price 0-100% to be set by Service Purchaser conducting mini- competition SCHEDULE 3 ORDER FORM TEMPLATE Orders will be completed using the order form template set out in this Schedule 3. The template can be used for Order of both Standard Services and Competed Services. Each Order comprises: • Part A, the Independence Plan, used to complete details of FACS-eligible Service Users; otherwise it is left blank; • Part B, the Order details, to be completed for each Order • Part C, the Order acknowledgement which, if instructed, the Provider must sign and return to the Authority; • Part D, which attaches the Call-Off Terms and Conditions, the Services Specifications and any other documents that are relevant to the provision of the Services, such as an Other Contracting Body’s contract management procedures. The Authority reserves the right to modify the order form template from time to time. ORDER FOR SERVICES - PART A Personal Support Division MY INDEPENDENCE PLAN Your Independence Plan is where your agreed outcomes, support and services are set out. See the attached booklet - “Guidance o...
Sample 1
Competed Services Award Criteria. Criterion number Criterion Percentage weightings (or rank order of importance where applicable) 1 Quality To be set by customer conducting mini-competition 2 Price To be set by customer conducting mini-competition Schedule 3 Pricing Matrices [INSERT RELEVANT PRICING MATRICES SUBMITTED IN SERVICE PROVIDER'S TENDER FOR THE SERVICES FOR EACH OF THE SERVICE PROVIDER'S LOTS] Pricing revisions The prices contained in the Pricing Matrix are subject to revision on an annual basis with effect from each anniversary of the Commencement Date in line with the percentage increase in the Consumer Prices Index in the preceding 12-month period. The first such increase shall take effect at the beginning of the second Framework Year and shall be based on the latest available figure for the percentage increase in the Consumer Prices Index at the beginning of the last month of the previous Framework Year. Schedule 4 Order Form Framework Agreement FROM Customer: Service address: Invoice address:
Sample 1
Competed Services Award Criteria. Not Applicable – as this a single supplier framework, call-off award criteria is not required. SCHEDULE 3 PRICING MATRICES Pricing Schedule JEGS Practitioner Training Our pricing model for the delivery of JEGS Practitioner Training for the period of the framework agreement i.e. Dec 2013 to Nov 2017, is set out in Table 1 overleaf: [Detailed pricing – redacted re: Section 43 Commercial Interests of the Freedom of Information Act] Payment profile Delivery – payment will be monthly in arrears for work undertaken i.e. on completion of each course /learning event. Cancellation by or caused by the Authority Notice given 0ver 10 calendar days 10% 5-10 calendar days 50% Fewer than 5 calendar days 100% Cancellation caused by the Contractor Notice given Charges applied Over 10 calendar days 5-10 calendar days Payment of any unavoidable costs incurred Fewer than 5 calendar days Payment of any unavoidable costs incurred plus course to be provided at nil charge at a later date. DWP TRAVEL AND SUBSISTENCE POLICY Travel and subsistence expenses will be reimbursed only where delivery staff are required to travel outside normal daily travelling distance/time. Travel and subsistence expenses shall be by prior approval of DWP in accordance with the current policy and rates. These rates may be subject to change. Where applicable, expenses as incurred shall be reimbursed in accordance with the following policy: Rail Travel Supplier staff shall be entitled to standard class travel only. Air Claims for domestic air travel is not permitted unless the flight is over 300 miles. This limit is for one-way flights within the British mainland. In particular, for travel between the destinations shown below air travel is not permitted, journeys must be taken by rail: Newcastle and London Birmingham and Newcastle Manchester and London Where travel by air is the only mode of travel suitable, for a domestic journey that is more than 300 miles, Econonmy Class only must be booked regardless of the length/duration of the journey. Taxis Taxi fares may be reimbursed where their use is reasonable in the circumstances. In case of doubt the Authority’s Representative should be consulted prior to undertaking the relevant journey. Actual fares only can be claimed and in the following circumstances:  where there is no other suitable method of public transport;  in exceptional and infrequent circumstances where the saving of official time is important;  when heavy luggage has to be handled;  when t...
Sample 1

Related to Competed Services Award Criteria

  • Award Criteria 40.1 The Procuring Entity shall award the Contract to the successful tenderer whose tender has been determined to be the Lowest Evaluated Tender in accordance with procedures in Section 3: Evaluation and Qualification Criteria.

  • Selection Criteria for Awarding Task Order The Government will award to the offeror whose proposal is deemed most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment using the evaluation criteria. The Government will evaluate proposals against established selection criteria specified in the task order RFP. Generally, the Government's award decision will be based on selection criteria which addresses past performance, technical acceptability, proposal risk and cost. Among other sources, evaluation of past performance may be based on past performance assessments provided by TO Program Managers on individual task orders performed throughout the life of the contract. The order of importance for the factors will be identified in the RFP for the specified task order.

  • PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES 4.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) sets out-

  • Performance Goals A. The Trust and State Street have developed mutually acceptable performance goals dated March 1, 2011 , and as may be amended from time to time, regarding the manner in which they expect to deliver and receive the services under this Agreement (hereinafter referred to as “Service Level Agreement”). The parties agree that such Service Level Agreement reflects performance goals and any failure to perform in accordance with the provisions thereof shall not be considered a breach of contract that gives rise to contractual or other remedies. It is the intention of the parties that the sole remedy for failure to perform in accordance with the provisions of the Service Level Agreement, or any dispute relating to performance goals set forth in the Service Level Agreement, will be a meeting of the parties to resolve the failure pursuant to the consultation procedure described in Sections V. B. and V.C. below. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties hereby acknowledge that any party’s failure (or lack thereof) to meet the provisions of the Service Level Agreement, while not in and of itself a breach of contract giving rise to contractual or other remedies, may factor into the Trust’s reasonably determined belief regarding the standard of care exercised by State Street hereunder.

  • Performance Criteria The Performance Criteria are set forth in Exhibit A to this Agreement.

  • Performance Schedule The Parties will perform their respective responsibilities in accordance with the Performance Schedule. By executing this Agreement, Customer authorizes Motorola to proceed with contract performance.

  • Further Competition Award Criteria 1. Where a Contracting Body may require Suppliers to develop proposals or a solution in respect of its Statement of Requirements or need to amend or refine the terms of the Call-Off Contract to reflect its Statement of Requirements to the extent permitted by and in accordance with applicable laws (including procurement laws and all necessary guidance), the following criteria shall be applied to the Services set out in the Framework Service Providers' compliant tenders submitted through the Further Competition Procedure:

  • Performance Measures and Metrics This section outlines the performance measures and metrics upon which service under this SLA will be assessed. Shared Service Centers and Customers will negotiate the performance metric, frequency, customer and provider service responsibilities associated with each performance measure. Measurements of the Port of Seattle activities are critical to improving services and are the basis for cost recovery for services provided. The Port of Seattle and The Northwest Seaport Alliance have identified activities critical to meeting The NWSA’s business requirements and have agreed upon how these activities will be assessed.

  • Performance Measures The System Agency will monitor the Grantee’s performance of the requirements in Attachment A and compliance with the Contract’s terms and conditions.

  • Performance Standards The Contractor agrees to perform all tasks and provide deliverables as set forth in the Contract. The Department and the Customer will be entitled at all times, upon request, to be advised as to the status of work being done by the Contractor and of the details thereof.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.