Comparisons of value Sample Clauses

Comparisons of value. The offer price under the Share Offer of HK$4.35 per Share represents:
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Comparisons of value. The cash offer price offered under the H Share Offer represents:
Sample 1
Comparisons of value. Under the Share Offer, the Share Offer Price represents:
Sample 1
Comparisons of value. The Scheme Consideration Price of HK$10.22 per Scheme Share represents: • a premium of approximately 23.43% over the closing price of HK$8.28 per Share on the Last Trading Day; • a premium of approximately 31.46% over the average closing price of approximately HK$7.77 per Share based on the daily closing prices as quoted on the Stock Exchange for the 5 trading days up to and including the Last Trading Day; • a premium of approximately 33.42% over the average closing price of approximately HK$7.66 per Share based on the daily closing prices as quoted on the Stock Exchange for the 10 trading days up to and including the Last Trading Day; • a premium of approximately 44.44% over the average closing price of approximately HK$7.08 per Share based on the daily closing prices as quoted on the Stock Exchange for the 30 trading days up to and including the Last Trading Day; • a premium of approximately 50.44% over the average closing price of approximately HK$6.79 per Share based on the daily closing prices as quoted on the Stock Exchange for the 60 trading days up to and including the Last Trading Day; • a premium of approximately 56.52% over the average closing price of approximately HK$6.53 per Share based on the daily closing prices as quoted on the Stock Exchange for the 90 trading days up to and including the Last Trading Day; • a premium of approximately 70.96% over the average closing price of approximately HK$5.98 per Share based on the daily closing prices as quoted on the Stock Exchange for the 180 trading days up to and including the Last Trading Day; and • a premium of approximately 10.01% over the audited consolidated net asset value per Share of approximately HK$9.29 per Share as at 31 December 2018. The Offeror will not increase the Scheme Consideration Price or the Share Award Offer Price. Shareholders and potential investors should be aware that, following the making of this statement, the Offeror will not be allowed to increase the Scheme Consideration Price or the Share Award Offer Price. The Offeror does not reserve the right to increase the Scheme Consideration Price or the Share Award Offer Price.
Sample 1

Related to Comparisons of value

  • Measurements and arithmetic conventions All measurements and calculations shall be in the metric system and calculations done to 2 (two) decimal places, with the third digit of 5 (five) or above being rounded up and below 5 (five) being rounded down.

  • Performance Evaluations 34.1. The Contractor is subject to an annual performance evaluation to be conducted by NYCDOT pursuant to the PPB Rules.

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • TEACHER EVALUATIONS A. Each teacher shall have the right, upon request, to review the contents of his/her personal file folder.

  • Values Our values act as guiding principles for how we do our work, the culture we aim to promote and a benchmark to measure behaviors and performance.

  • Annual Performance Evaluation On either a fiscal year or calendar year basis, (consistently applied from year to year), the Bank shall conduct an annual evaluation of Executive’s performance. The annual performance evaluation proceedings shall be included in the minutes of the Board meeting that next follows such annual performance review.

  • Comparison of Tenders 34.1 The Procuring Entity shall compare the evaluated costs of all substantially responsive Tenders established in accordance with ITT 33.2 to determine the Tender that has the lowest evaluated cost. The comparison shall be on the basis of total cost (place of final destination) prices for all goods and all prices, plus cost of inland transportation and insurance to place of destination, for goods manufactured within the Kenya, together with prices for any required installation, training, commissioning and other services.

  • Fees and Revenue a. The AGENCY shall report to the COUNTY all fees collected in the performance of this Contract on a quarterly basis. The AGENCY’S fees for programs or services funded by the COUNTY shall be reported on the quarterly report form and indicate all revenue generated from the collected fees. When such fees are changed, the COUNTY shall receive immediate notification in writing from the AGENCY with appropriate justification.

  • Evaluation and Comparison of Tenders 2.24.1 The Procuring entity will evaluate and compare the tenders which have been determined to be substantially responsive, pursuant to paragraph 2.22

  • TEACHER EVALUATION A. All monitoring or observation of the work performance of a teacher shall be conducted openly and with full knowledge of the teacher.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.