Collaborative Project. The European Union (the "Union"), represented by the European Commission (the "Commission"), of the one part, and UNIVERSITAET SIEGEN, established in HERRENGARTEN 3, 57072 SIEGEN - GERMANY, represented by Xx Xxxxxx XXXXXXXXX, Rektor and/or Xx Xxxxxx Xxxxx XXXXXXX, Xxxxxxx, or their authorised representative, the beneficiary acting as coordinator of the consortium (the "coordinator" ), ("beneficiary n° 1"), of the other part HAVE AGREED to the following terms and conditions including those in the following annexes, which form an integral part of this grant agreement (the "grant agreement”). Annex I - Description of Work Annex II - General conditions Xxxxx XXX - Non applicable Xxxxx XX - Form A – Accession of beneficiaries to the grant agreement Annex V - Form B – Request for accession of a new beneficiary to the grant agreement Annex VI - Form C – Financial statement per funding scheme Annex VII - Form D – Terms of reference for the certificate on the financial statements and Form E - Terms of reference for the certificate on the methodology
Collaborative Project. The Broken Hill Health Service eICU service aims to develop, implement and maintain a collaborative intensive care service model with a suitably qualified tertiary health facility within NSW. This networked service will ensure consistency with the role delineation of the Broken Hill Health Service. The eICU service will provide appropriate diagnosis and treatment of patients in need of the most critical care by remote intensivists using telehealth technology. The collaborative service will provide: opportunity for earlier interventions for critically ill patients; decrease inter-hospital transfers; increase awareness of high acuity patients for proactive monitoring; and support care and compliance for patients before transfer decisions.
Collaborative Project. Provider is named in recipient’s proposal to CI and CI has expressly approved the provider in the award to the recipient.
Collaborative Project. Contents 1 Concept and objectives, progress beyond state-of-the-art, S/T methodology and work plan 3 1.1 Concept and project objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.1.1 Long-term vision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.1.2 Breakthroughs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 1.1.3 Concrete Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 1.2 Progress beyond the state of the art . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 1.2.1 State of the Art . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 1.2.2 Baseline of the project . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 1.2.3 Advances and Performance/research indicators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 1.2.4 Vision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 1.2.5 Novelty of the proposal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 1.3 S/T methodology and associated work plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 1.3.1 Overall strategy and general description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 1.3.2 Timing of work packages and their components . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 2 Implementation 21 2.1 Management structure and procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 2.1.1 Structure of the management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 2.1.2 Management procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 2.1.3 Access to documents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 2.2 Beneficiaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 2.2.1 Participant 1. IUAV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 2.2.2 Participant 2. IRCAM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 2.2.3 Participant 3. KTH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 2.2.4 Participant 4. GENESIS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 2.3 Consortium as a whole . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 2.4 Resources to be committed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 3 Impact 3...
Collaborative Project. Contents B1 Concept and objectives, progress beyond state-of-the-art, S/T methodology and work plan 2 B1.1 Concept and project objective(s) 2 B1.2 Progress beyond the state-of-the-art 6 B1.3 S/T methodology and associated work plan 12 B1.3.1 Overall strategy and general description 12 B1.4 Timing of work packages and their components 16 B2 Implementation 17 B2.1 Management structure and procedures 17 B2.2 Beneficiaries 20
Collaborative Project. Table of Contents B1. CONCEPT AND OBJECTIVES, PROGRESS BEYOND STATE-OF-THE-ART, S/T METHODOLOGY AND WORK PLAN 2 B1.1 CONCEPT AND PROJECT OBJECTIVE(S) 2
Collaborative Project
