Collaboration Board Sample Clauses

Collaboration Board. 6.1 The Collaboration Board shall be composed of a senior representative of each party. The parties may appoint a proxy.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Collaboration Board. 5.1 The Collaboration Board, with due respect to the Grant Agreement including Annex I (Description of Work) thereto, shall in particular:
Sample 1
Collaboration Board. 5.2.1 The Collaboration Board is the highest decision-making body. It defines the Research Programme of the Collaboration including the number and topics of the Research Lines.
Sample 1
Collaboration Board. The Collaboration Board (CB) is composed of one nominated Institute Representative (IR) per Institute. The spokesperson(s) and/or his/her deputy, the CB chair and his/her deputy, the Research Line Conveners, the Budget Holder of the CCF and the CERN contact person attend the CB as ex-officio members; the CB chair can invite additional experts as ex-officio members.
Sample 1
Collaboration Board. The Collaboration Board is the principal governing body of the collaboration. It is the final deciding body of the collaboration. The Collaboration Board is basically the assembly of the representatives of all institutes in the collaboration, thus ensuring proper representation of all collaboration members. Its mandate is to take strategic decisions on the experiment and the construction of further telescopes, and to supervise the actions of the Executive Board.
Sample 1
Collaboration Board. Signatories will meet periodically in a Collaboration Board. CB to meet... bianually? The effort dedicated by each partner will be recorded and this is understood to represent a proportional influence on project direction. How should decisions be taken in practise - Voting? “Proportional consensus”? Activities of the CB: • Develop (approve?) roadmap and program of work • Approve project lead • Review the pledges and responsibilities of the members • Accept new members. • Amend the collaboration agreement. • Seek funding?
Sample 1
Collaboration Board. The Collaboration Board is the governing body concerned with scientific and technical aspects of the Collaboration. It deals with issues including governance of the Collaboration, scientific policy, its new members and institutions, publication policy and monitoring the construction and, operation and decommissioning of the Xxxxxx Xxxxx Observatory to ensure that the scientific objectives of the project are met. The members of the Collaboration Board are appointed by their home institutions from among the scientists participating in the Xxxxxx Xxxxx Collaboration. The chairperson and the secretary of the Collaboration Board are elected from the membership for a renewable two-year term. Details on organization of the Collaboration Board are described in the Xxxxxx Xxxxx Collaboration Board bylaws contained in the Xxxxxx Xxxxx Project Management Plan.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Collaboration Board. The Collaboration Board is the highest decision-making body of the collaboration, and it ultimately defines the Research Program of the Collaboration. Participation in CB meetings is limited to one IR per Institute, and to the two co-Spokespersons and the CB Chair as ex-officio members; additional experts may be invited. In case an IR cannot attend an CB meeting, he/she can nominate an IR delegate representing the Institute: in this case the CB Chair shall be informed by the IR in advance of the meeting. Attendance to CB meetings can be live or remote, e.g. via videoconference. The CB elects the CB Chair among the members of the Collaboration. Meetings of the CB should take place at least once every six months, or more frequently if requested by the CB Chair. Decisions and Elections Decisions shall be agreed by consensus whenever possible and it shall be the responsibility of the co- Spokespersons and the CB Chair to build such a consensus. However, in absence of a consensus, the issue will be decided by vote. Elections shall always be decided by vote. The voting is made by voice or show of hands unless: one or more CB members ask for a secret ballot; if voting regards a person or an Institute in which case those concerned must leave the meeting room during the discussion preceding the vote, and during the vote. Only IR’s, or IR delegates notified before the meeting, by letter or electronic mail to the CB Chair, are allowed to participate in a vote. In principle decisions are taken by simple majority vote of those present and having voting right, always provided that the subject matter is included in the agenda of the meeting. However, important issues ("Important Issues") and elections shall be announced at least four weeks in advance by the CB chair, and such decisions requires two-thirds majority of the Institutes. A sample list of Important Issues is listed below: other Issues may be declared Important by the CB Chair, if raised by at least one Institute, one Spokesperson or by the CB Chair himself. Examples of Important Issues • Amendments of the MoU (see Article 12) • Revision of the Research Program and on relative priorities in its execution • Decision on the membership of the collaboration and participation of new Institutes (see Annex 4) • Decision on terminating WGs or forming new ones • Decision on the amount of contribution to the Collaboration Common Fund and the approval of the Annual Financial Plan • Election of the CB Chair • Election of t...
Sample 1
Collaboration Board. The Collaboration Board is the policy- and decision-m aking body of the ATLAS Collaboration. Typical tasks of the Collaboration Board will be: • decisions on the global detector design; • policy matters (guidelines for the interaction with the LHC Committee and the CERN Management, publications, presentations etc.); • financial and human resources; • elections; • ATLAS organization; • ATLAS membership. Members of the Collaboration Board are: • in general one representative per institution; however, institutions may have, at their discretion, up to two representatives; • members of the Executive Board ( ex officio). Each participating institution has one and only one vote. Decisions require a 2 / 3 majority of the institutions represented during the vote. A quorum of 50% (including procurations) is required. Voting representatives can carry not more than 2 procurations in addition to their own vote. In case a 2 / 3 majority cannot be obtained another vote has to be arranged for a later date with the aim of obtaining a 2 / 3 majority at that time. If this majority still cannot be obtained a further vote with a relative majority (abstentions not counted) will decide. Elections will follow the subsequent procedure:
Sample 1

Related to Collaboration Board

  • Joint Steering Committee [***] following the Effective Date [***], a joint steering committee (the “JSC”) will be established by the Parties to provide oversight and to facilitate information sharing between the Parties with respect to the activities under this Agreement.

  • Collaboration We believe joint effort toward common goals achieves trust and produces greater impact for L.A. County’s youngest children and their families.

  • Steering Committee The Project Manager shall set up a Steering Committee for the Project, consisting of representatives from the Department, the Contractor, and any other key organisations whom the project will impact on, to be agreed between the parties. The function of the Steering Committee shall be to review the scope and direction of the Project against its aims and objectives, monitor progress and efficiency, and assess, manage and review expected impact and use of the findings from the Project. The Committee shall meet at times and dates agreed by the parties, or in the absence of agreement, specified by the Department. The Contractor’s representatives on the Steering Committee shall report their views on the progress of the Project to the Steering Committee in writing if requested by the Department. The Contractor’s representatives on the Steering Committee shall attend all meetings of the Steering Committee unless otherwise agreed by the Department.

  • Local Negotiating Committee (a) A negotiating committee of four (4) employee representatives appointed by the union including the bargaining unit president.

  • Project Steering Committee (a) The Recipient shall maintain at all times until the completion of the Project, the Project Steering Committee with a composition, mandate and resources satisfactory to the World Bank.

  • Study Committee The parties shall utilize the Benefits Advisory Committee, with equal membership by the State and the VSEA, for the purpose of reviewing all issues related to health care and prescription drugs, and recommending changes to the bargaining committees. The parties shall also establish a special study committee to evaluate the current health plans, and make recommendations to the bargaining committees of the State and employees for sustainable savings in the health care plans.

  • Staffing Committee A. Responsibilities. The Nurse Staffing Committee (“NSC”) shall be responsible for determining the Institute’s staffing plan and resolving complaints raised by nurses regarding the implementation of the plan as well as those activities required of it under RCW 70.41, et seq and its successors.

  • Training Committee The parties to this Agreement may form a Training Committee. The Training Committee will be constituted by equal numbers of Employer nominees and ETU employee representatives and have a charter which clearly states its role and responsibilities. It shall monitor the clauses of this Agreement which relate to training and ensure all employees have equal access to training.

  • Curriculum Committee The Curriculum Committee shall consist of sixteen (16) members of the bargaining unit, three (3) students, and three (3) administrators; provided, however, that in the case of the Massachusetts College of Art and Design, the Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts and the Massachusetts Maritime Academy, the Curriculum Committee shall be composed of ten (10) members of the bargaining unit, two (2) students, and two (2) administrators.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.