CERTIFICATION REVIEW Sample Clauses

CERTIFICATION REVIEW. 5.1. Following receipt of Your Application, GBCI will initiate its review, which includes review of the Application and all accompanying documentation You submit therewith, and administration of Your Project to determine if it is eligible for WELL Certification (and if so, the appropriate level of WELL Certification to be conferred) and/or review of the results of an on-site performance assessment and performance testing (with such performance testing and performance review and assessment collectively referred to as “WELL Performance Verification” or “Performance Verification”). During a review, GBCI may request additional documentation, resubmission of calculations and any other information or factors that GBCI deems relevant. GBCI will strive to meet any review timelines set forth in the Certification Guidebook (each, a “Review Timeline”); however, the Review Timelines are estimates only. The failure of GBCI to meet any Review Timeline will not be considered a breach of this Agreement and You will not be entitled to any remedy, including a refund of any portion of any Fees paid by You under this Agreement as a result of such failure; provided, however, You will be accorded additional time to respond to GBCI commensurate with any delay caused by GBCI’s failure to meet a Review Timeline.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
CERTIFICATION REVIEW. 7.1 Upon receipt of Your project submission for Audit, GBCI will send confirmation to the EDGE Auditor to begin the audit process. If You have not contracted with an approved Auditor at the time of submitting Your project, You have an additional 30 calendar days to directly contract with an EDGE Auditor or you may elect to have GBCI assign an EDGE Auditor to your project. No review will begin until an EDGE Auditor is identified with Your Project. A list of approved EDGE Auditors is available in the Auditor Database on the website: xxxxx://xxxx.xxxx.xxx/certification#select. During an audit and subsequent review by GBCI, the Auditor and/or GBCI may request additional documentation, resubmission of calculations and any other information deemed relevant. GBCI will strive to meet the review timelines set forth in the Guide to EDGE Certification (each, a “Review Timeline”). However, the Review Timelines are estimates only. GBCI’s failure to meet any Review Timeline will not be considered a breach of this Agreement and You will not be entitled to any remedy, including a refund of any portion of any Fees paid by You under this Agreement. Further, GBCI’s failure to meet any Expedited Review Timeline provided in the Guide to EDGE Certification will not be considered a breach of this Agreement and You will not be entitled to any remedy under this Agreement; however, GBCI will refund any premium fees paid by You to expedite the review.
Sample 1Sample 2
CERTIFICATION REVIEW. CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for providing certification review hearings for patients in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. CONTRACTOR shall contact COUNTY Patients’ Rights Advocate, the Public Defender’s Office and a person approved by COUNTY to serve as a Certification Review Hearing Officer immediately upon certification of any patient and in no event later than one business day before certification hearing. COUNTY and CONTRACTOR will share in the responsibility to provide doctors or other professionals to provide testimony or evidence at any such hearing.
Sample 1Sample 2
CERTIFICATION REVIEW. 4.1 Upon receipt of Your Application for a Project, GBCI will initiate its review, which includes review of the Application, and all accompanying documentation You submit therewith to determine if the Project is eligible for Certification. During a review, GBCI may request additional documentation, resubmission of calculations and any other information or factors that GBCI deems relevant, including, at GBCI’s discretion, a site visit to confirm the accuracy of the documentation which You will allow, provided GBCI has given You advance notice and made a reasonable attempt to conform to Your schedule. GBCI will use all reasonable efforts to meet any review timelines set forth in the Guide to Certification (each, a “Review Timeline”); however, such Review Timelines are estimates only. The failure of GBCI to meet any Review Timeline will not be considered a material breach of this Agreement and You will not be entitled to any refund of any portion of any Fees paid by You under this Agreement as a result of such failure, provided, however, You will be accorded additional time to respond to GBCI commensurate with any delay related to GBCI’s failure to meet a Review Timeline.
Sample 1
CERTIFICATION REVIEW. 7.1 Upon receipt of Your project submission for EDGE Zero Carbon Certification, GBCI will initiate its review to determine if Your Project is eligible for Zero Carbon Certification. During a review, GBCI may request additional documentation, resubmission of calculations and any other information GBCI deems relevant. GBCI will strive to meet the review timelines set forth in the Guide to EDGE Certification (each, a “Review Timeline”). However, the Review Timelines are estimates only. GBCI’s failure to meet any Review Timeline will not be considered a breach of this Agreement and You will not be entitled to any remedy, including a refund of any portion of any Fees paid by You under this Agreement. Further, GBCI’s failure to meet any Expedited Review Timeline provided in the Guide to EDGE Certification will not be considered a breach of this Agreement and You will not be entitled to any remedy under this Agreement; however, GBCI will refund any premium fees paid by You to expedite the review.
Sample 1
CERTIFICATION REVIEW. In order to become a Certified NetFlex Partner Application Provider, NetFlex Partner’s Certified Partner Application must pass a set of minimum compatibility and quality tests in strict compliance with NetSuite’s Certification Standards, which are available for review on the NetFlex portal at xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxx.xxx/portal/partner/netflex/main.shtml, and which are hereby incorporated by reference. NetSuite reserves the right to change its Certification Standards at any time in its sole discretion.
Sample 1
CERTIFICATION REVIEW. 7.1 Upon receipt of Your Application, GBCI will initiate its review to determine if Your Project is eligible for Parksmart Certification, and if so, the appropriate level of Parksmart Certification to be conferred. During a review, GBCI may request additional documentation, resubmission of calculations and any other information GBCI deems relevant. GBCI will strive to meet the review timelines set forth in the Certification Guide (each, a “Review Timeline”); however, the Review Timelines are estimates only. GBCI’s failure to meet any Review Timeline will not be considered a breach of this Agreement and You will not be entitled to any remedy, including a refund of any portion of any Fees paid by You under this Agreement. Further, GBCI’s failure to meet any Expedited Review Timeline, if any, provided in the Certification Guide will not be considered a breach of this Agreement and You will not be entitled to any remedy under this Agreement; however, GBCI will refund any premium fees paid by You to expedite the review.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
CERTIFICATION REVIEW. This is a Keep-or-Drop review by CDE. During this review, the performance tasks are reviewed for their fidelity to the final text agreed upon at the Alpha draft task build text (see above) and for the final functionality as agreed in the Alpha draft task build functionality mockup.
Sample 1
CERTIFICATION REVIEW. 5.1 Upon receipt of Your Application for a Project, GBCI Canada will initiate its review, which includes review of the Application, and all accompanying documentation You submit therewith to determine if the Project is eligible for Certification (and if so, the appropriate level of Certification to be conferred). During a review, GBCI C a n a d a may request additional documentation, resubmission of calculations and any other information or factors that GBCI Canada deems relevant, including, at GBCI Canada’s discretion, a site visit to confirm the accuracy of the documentation which You will allow, provided GBCI Canada has given You advance notice and made a reasonable attempt to conform to Your schedule. GBCI Canada will use all reasonable efforts to meet any review timelines set forth in the Certification Guidebook (each, a “Review Timeline”); however, such Review Timelines are estimates only. The failure of GBCI Canada to meet any Review Timeline will not be considered a material breach of this Agreement and You will not be entitled to any refund of any portion of any Fees paid by You under this Agreement as a result of such failure, provided, however, You will be accorded additional time to respond to GBCI Canada commensurate with any delay related to GBCI Canada’s failure to meet a Review Timeline.
Sample 1

Related to CERTIFICATION REVIEW

  • Validation Review In the event OIG has reason to believe that: (a) Good Shepherd’s Claims Review fails to conform to the requirements of this CIA; or (b) the IRO’s findings or Claims Review results are inaccurate, OIG may, at its sole discretion, conduct its own review to determine whether the Claims Review complied with the requirements of the CIA and/or the findings or Claims Review results are inaccurate (Validation Review). Good Shepherd shall pay for the reasonable cost of any such review performed by OIG or any of its designated agents. Any Validation Review of Reports submitted as part of Good Shepherd’s final Annual Report shall be initiated no later than one year after Good Shepherd’s final submission (as described in Section II) is received by OIG. Prior to initiating a Validation Review, OIG shall notify Good Shepherd of its intent to do so and provide a written explanation of why OIG believes such a review is necessary. To resolve any concerns raised by OIG, Good Shepherd may request a meeting with OIG to: (a) discuss the results of any Claims Review submissions or findings; (b) present any additional information to clarify the results of the Claims Review or to correct the inaccuracy of the Claims Review; and/or (c) propose alternatives to the proposed Validation Review. Good Shepherd agrees to provide any additional information as may be requested by OIG under this Section III.D.3 in an expedited manner. OIG will attempt in good faith to resolve any Claims Review issues with Good Shepherd prior to conducting a Validation Review. However, the final determination as to whether or not to proceed with a Validation Review shall be made at the sole discretion of OIG.

  • Certification Regarding Lobbying Applicable to Grants, Subgrants, Cooperative Agreements, and Contracts Exceeding $100,000 in Federal Funds Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction and is imposed by section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that: (1) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of a Federal contract, the making of a Federal grant, the making of a Federal loan, the entering into a cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of a Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. (2) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal grant or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, “disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,” in accordance with its instructions. (3) The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all covered subawards exceeding $100,000 in Federal funds at all appropriate tiers and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. I HAVE NOT Lobbied per above If you answered "I HAVE lobbied" to the above Attribute Question If you answered "I HAVE lobbied" to the above Attribute question, you must download the Lobbying Report "Standard From LLL, disclosure Form to Report Lobbying" which includes instruction on completing the form, complete and submit it in the Response Attachments section as a report of the lobbying activities you performed or paid others to perform. Subcontracting with Small and Minority Businesses, Women's Business Enterprises, and Labor Surplus Area Firms. Do you ever anticipate the possibility of subcontracting any of your work under this award if you are successful? IF NO, DO NOT ANSWER THE NEXT ATTRIBUTE QUESTION. . IF YES, and ONLY IF YES, you must answer the next question YES if you want a TIPS Member to be authorized to spend Federal Grant Funds for Procurement. NO

  • Classification Review (a) An Employee who has reason to believe that they are improperly classified due to a substantial change in job duties, may apply to the Department Director, or designate, to have the Employee’s classification reviewed. The Director, or designate, will review the Employee’s application and advise the Employee of the Employer’s decision.

  • Contractor Certification Regarding Ethics The Contractor certifies that the Contractor is now, and shall remain, in compliance with Chapter 42.52 RCW, Ethics in Public Service, throughout the term of this Contract.

  • Position Review ‌ The Employer may initiate a position review for a position it believes is improperly classified, and will inform the Union in writing when it has initiated a reallocation process for a bargaining unit position. An individual employee who believes that their position is improperly classified may request a review according to the following procedure:

  • Recertification Upon expiration of the time period which the health care provider originally estimated that the employee needed for his/her own serious health condition, the City may require the employee to obtain recertification if additional leave is requested.

  • Utilization Review We review health services to determine whether the services are or were Medically Necessary or experimental or investigational ("Medically Necessary"). This process is called Utilization Review. Utilization Review includes all review activities, whether they take place prior to the service being performed (Preauthorization); when the service is being performed (concurrent); or after the service is performed (retrospective). If You have any questions about the Utilization Review process, please call the number on Your ID card. The toll-free telephone number is available at least 40 hours a week with an after-hours answering machine. All determinations that services are not Medically Necessary will be made by: 1) licensed Physicians; or 2) licensed, certified, registered or credentialed health care professionals who are in the same profession and same or similar specialty as the Provider who typically manages Your medical condition or disease or provides the health care service under review. We do not compensate or provide financial incentives to Our employees or reviewers for determining that services are not Medically Necessary. We have developed guidelines and protocols to assist Us in this process. Specific guidelines and protocols are available for Your review upon request. For more information, call the number on Your ID card or visit Our website at xxx.xxxxxxx.xxx.

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances

  • Drug-Free Workplace Certification As required by Executive Order No. 90-5 dated April 12, 1990, issued by the Governor of Indiana, the Contractor hereby covenants and agrees to make a good faith effort to provide and maintain a drug-free workplace. The Contractor will give written notice to the State within ten (10) days after receiving actual notice that the Contractor, or an employee of the Contractor in the State of Indiana, has been convicted of a criminal drug violation occurring in the workplace. False certification or violation of this certification may result in sanctions including, but not limited to, suspension of contract payments, termination of this Contract and/or debarment of contracting opportunities with the State for up to three (3) years. In addition to the provisions of the above paragraph, if the total amount set forth in this Contract is in excess of $25,000.00, the Contractor certifies and agrees that it will provide a drug-free workplace by:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.