Capacity Shortfall Sample Clauses

Capacity Shortfall. (a) If Seller elects to commence Commercial Operation with a Generating Facility size of less than Generating Facility Nameplate Capacity, Seller shall use commercially reasonable efforts to cause the Generating Facility to achieve full Generating Facility Nameplate Capacity of [ ]. The difference, measured in [MWAC] [MWDC], between the actual facility size and the Generating Facility Nameplate Capacity is referred to as the “Capacity Shortfall”.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Capacity Shortfall of greater than five days If ARTC expects that an event resulting in a Capacity Shortfall will be for a duration of more than five days or an event resulting in a Capacity Shortfall subsequently has a duration of more than five days, and there will be insufficient Capacity to meet all remaining unconditional Capacity entitlements held by all access holders in that Month after taking into account likely usage of access holders with an allocation period of a Quarter, ARTC will allocate the Capacity available in accordance with the following principles: Deleted: ,
Capacity Shortfall. If, after determining the Demonstrated Firm Capacity as provided in Section 5.1(E) (Capacity Test), the Demonstrated Firm Capacity is less than the Contract Firm Capacity, the Capacity Charge payment to Seller shall be reduced by a factor of 1.2 multiplied by each one percentage point (1%), rounded up to the nearest one percentage point (1%) when the fraction of the percentage is between 0.5 inclusive and the next integer, by which the Demonstrated Firm Capacity is less than the Contract Firm Capacity, down to a maximum of ten percentage points (10%) below the Contract Firm Capacity in accordance with Section 2(iv) of Attachment W (Capacity Test Procedures).
Capacity Shortfall. If, after determining the Demonstrated Firm Capacity as provided in Section 5.1(E) (Capacity Test), the Demonstrated Firm Capacity is less than the Contract Firm Capacity, the Capacity Charge payment to Seller shall be reduced in accordance with Section 4 of Attachment W (Capacity Test Procedures).
Capacity Shortfall. 11.4.1.1 In the event that, at any time after the Date of Commercial Operation and before the Phase II Date of Commercial Operation, the CNDC is reduced below 95% of the INDC determined pursuant to Section 7.2.1, then, as Liquidated Damages, Seller will pay the Company $50 per kilowatt of the difference between 95% of the original INDC and the CNDC. This amount shall be escalated monthly using the Gross Domestic Product Implicit Price Deflator ("GDPIPD") beginning with the Effective Date. In the event that Seller pays Liquidated Damages pursuant to this Section, the INDC determined pursuant to Section 7.2.1 shall be reduced to the level of 105.263% of the CNDC upon which the Liquidated Damages assessment has been based for purposes of subsequent Liquidated Damages assessments pursuant to this Section and Section 11.4.2. Additionally, the Design Rating for Phase II, as set forth in Section 7.1 and Section 7.2.2 shall be reduced by the percentage difference between the Phase I INDC and the CNDC upon which Liquidated Damages have been assessed pursuant to this Section. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, Seller may, upon twelve (12) month's prior written notice to the Company, which notice must be provided at any time up to two (2) years after Seller becomes obligated to pay Liquidated Damages pursuant to this Section, reinstate the CNDC of the Facility up to the INDC, and such reinstated CNDC shall be the CNDC for the purposes of calculating Capacity Payments and subsequent Liquidated Damages assessments pursuant to this Section.
Capacity Shortfall 

Related to Capacity Shortfall

  • Shortfall If, on any date, the Outstanding Advances shall exceed the Maximum Advance Amount (such excess, the "Shortfall Amount"), then the Customer shall on such date prepay the Outstanding Advances in an amount equal to such Shortfall Amount.

  • Cost Allocation Cost allocation of Generator Interconnection Related Upgrades shall be in accordance with Schedule 11 of Section II of the Tariff.

  • Excess Costs If the Permitted Costs exceeds the Finish Allowance, then Tenant shall pay all such excess costs (“Excess Costs”), provided, however, Landlord will, prior to the commencement of construction of Tenant’s Improvements, advise Tenant of the sum of the Contract Sum and the Construction Management Fee (the “Cost Estimate”). Tenant shall have five (5) business days from and after the receipt of such advice within which to approve or disapprove the Contract Sum and Cost Estimate. If Tenant fails to approve same by the expiration of the fifth such business day, then Tenant shall be deemed to have approved the Proposed Contract Sum and Cost Estimate. If Tenant disapproves the Contract Sum and Cost Estimate within such five (5) business day period, then Tenant shall either reduce the scope of Tenant’s Improvements such that the Contract Sum and Construction Management Fee do not exceed the Finish Allowance or, at Tenant’s option, Landlord shall obtain two (2) additional bids, provided that each day beyond such five (5) business day period and until the rebid is accepted by Tenant shall constitute a Tenant Delay hereunder. The foregoing process shall continue until a Contract Sum and Cost Estimate are accepted or deemed accepted by Tenant. Landlord and Tenant must approve (or be deemed to have approved) the Contract Sum for the construction of Tenant’s Improvements in writing prior to the commencement of construction.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.