Capacity Performance Metric Sample Clauses

Capacity Performance Metric. (a) Capacity Test and Liquidated Damages. During commissioning, and for each Measurement Period following the Commercial Operations Date, the Facility shall be required to complete a Capacity Test, as more fully set forth in Attachment T (Facility Tests) to this Agreement. For each Measurement Period for which the Facility fails to demonstrate that it satisfies the Capacity Performance Metric, Seller shall pay, and Company shall accept, as liquidated damages for such shortfall, the amount set forth in the following table (on a progressive basis) upon proper demand at the end the Measurement Period in question: Capacity Ratio Liquidated Damage Amount Tier 1 For each one-tenth of one percent (0.001) that the Capacity Ratio is below 100% and is above 94.9%, an 95.0% - 99.9% amount equal to one-tenth of one percent (0.001) of the Lump Sum Payment for the Measurement Period in question; plus Tier 2 For each one-tenth of one percent (0.001) that the Capacity Ratio is below 95% and is above 84.9%, an 85.0% - 94.9% amount equal to one and a half-tenths of one percent (0.0015) of the Lump Sum Payment for the Measurement Period in question; plus Tier 3 For each one-tenth of one percent (0.001) that the Capacity Ratio is below 85% and is above 74.9%, an 75.0% - 84.9% amount equal to two-tenths of one percent (0.002) of the Lump Sum Payment for the Measurement Period in question; plus Tier 4 For each one-tenth of one percent (0.001) that the Capacity Ratio is below 75% and is above 59.9%, an 60.0% - 74.9% amount equal to two and a half-tenths of one percent (0.0025) of the Lump Sum Payment for the Measurement Period in question; plus Tier 5 For each one-tenth of one percent (0.001) that the Capacity Ratio is below 60% and is above 49.9%, an 50.0% - 59.9% amount equal to three-tenths of one percent (0.003) of the Lump Sum Payment for the Measurement Period in question; plus
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Capacity Performance Metric

  • Performance Metrics In the event Grantee fails to timely achieve the following performance metrics (the “Performance Metrics”), then in accordance with Section 8.4 below Grantee shall upon written demand by Triumph repay to Triumph all portions of Grant theretofore funded to and received by Grantee:

  • Ongoing Performance Measures The Department intends to use performance-reporting tools in order to measure the performance of Contractor(s). These tools will include the Contractor Performance Survey (Exhibit H), to be completed by Customers on a quarterly basis. Such measures will allow the Department to better track Vendor performance through the term of the Contract(s) and ensure that Contractor(s) consistently provide quality services to the State and its Customers. The Department reserves the right to modify the Contractor Performance Survey document and introduce additional performance-reporting tools as they are developed, including online tools (e.g. tools within MFMP or on the Department's website).

  • Performance Measures and Metrics This section outlines the performance measures and metrics upon which service under this SLA will be assessed. Shared Service Centers and Customers will negotiate the performance metric, frequency, customer and provider service responsibilities associated with each performance measure. Measurements of the Port of Seattle activities are critical to improving services and are the basis for cost recovery for services provided. The Port of Seattle and The Northwest Seaport Alliance have identified activities critical to meeting The NWSA’s business requirements and have agreed upon how these activities will be assessed.

  • Acceptance/Performance Test 4.7.1 Prior to synchronization of the Power Project, the SPD shall be required to get the Project certified for the requisite acceptance/performance test as may be laid down by Central Electricity Authority or an agency identified by the central government to carry out testing and certification for the solar power projects.

  • Performance Levels (a) The Performance Levels which apply to the performance by the respective Parties of their obligations under this Agreement are set out in Part 1 of Schedule 5. A failure by either Party to achieve the relevant Performance Level will not constitute a breach of this Agreement and the only consequences of such failure as between the Parties shall be the consequences set out in this Clause 5.6.

  • Annual Performance Evaluation On either a fiscal year or calendar year basis, (consistently applied from year to year), the Bank shall conduct an annual evaluation of Executive’s performance. The annual performance evaluation proceedings shall be included in the minutes of the Board meeting that next follows such annual performance review.

  • Performance Measurement Satisfactory performance of this Contract will be measured by:

  • Key Performance Indicators 10.1 The Supplier shall at all times during the Framework Period comply with the Key Performance Indicators and achieve the KPI Targets set out in Part B of Framework Schedule 2 (Goods and/or Services and Key Performance Indicators).

  • Registry Performance Specifications Registry Performance Specifications for operation of the TLD will be as set forth in Specification 10 attached hereto (“Specification 10”). Registry Operator shall comply with such Performance Specifications and, for a period of at least one (1) year, shall keep technical and operational records sufficient to evidence compliance with such specifications for each calendar year during the Term.

  • Performance Targets Threshold, target and maximum performance levels for each performance measure of the performance period are contained in Appendix B.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.