Capacity Benchmarking Sample Clauses

Capacity Benchmarking. Westcoast will report to the TTTF in a timely fashion any positive or negative changes in the contractible capacity of any pipeline segment in Zones 3 and 4 of more than 20 MMcf/d on a cumulative basis compared to the contractible capacity of that segment as of the date of this Agreement. Westcoast will also post any such cumulative change on its bulletin board as a critical notice together with a brief explanation for the change.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Capacity Benchmarking. Westcoast will report to the TTTF in a timely fashion any positive or negative changes in the contractible capacity of any pipeline segment in Zones 3 and 4 of more than 20 MMcf/d on a cumulative basis compared to the contractible capacity of that segment as of the date of this Agreement. Westcoast will also post any such cumulative change on its bulletin board as a critical notice together with a brief explanation for the change. Westcoast will also make a presentation to the TTTF by November 30 of each year of the term of this Agreement of the relevant parameters that go into Westcoast’s decision making process for setting contractible and daily capacities in Zones 3 and 4. Westcoast confirms that it will at the time of such presentation act in good faith to implement reasonable suggestions from the TTTF as to ways to enhance the decision making process for setting contractible and daily available capacities in Zones 3 and 4.
Sample 1
Capacity Benchmarking. Westcoast will by August 31, 2008 provide to the TTTF a detailed up to date reconciliation from January 2004 of changes to the contractible capacity in Zones 3 and 4 on a segment by segment basis. Westcoast will discuss this reconciliation with the TTTF and, to the extent that the parties acting in good faith agree, Westcoast will adjust the current level of contractible capacity in Zones 3 and 4 on a segment by segment basis. Westcoast will report to the TTTF in a timely fashion any positive or negative changes in the contractible capacity of any pipeline segment in Zones 3 and 4 of more than 20 MMcf/d on a cumulative basis compared to the contractible capacity of that segment as of the date of this Agreement. Westcoast will also post any such cumulative change on its bulletin board as a critical notice together with a brief explanation for the change. Westcoast will also make a presentation to the TTTF by November 30 of each year of the term of this Agreement of the relevant parameters that go into Westcoast’s decision making process for setting contractible and daily available capacities in Zones 3 and 4. Westcoast confirms that it will at the time of such presentation act in good faith to implement reasonable suggestions from the TTTF as to ways to enhance the decision making process for setting contractible and daily available capacities in Zones 3 and 4.
Sample 1

Related to Capacity Benchmarking

  • Benchmarking 19.1 The Parties shall comply with the provisions of Framework Schedule 12 (Continuous Improvement and Benchmarking) in relation to the benchmarking of any or all of the Goods and/or Services.

  • Benchmarks 2.1 Benchmarks set forth the overall scope and level of responsibility and the typical duties by which jobs or positions are distinguished and classified under the Classification System.

  • Benchmarking Process 2.2.1 The Supplier shall produce and send to the Authority for Approval, a draft plan for the Benchmark Review.

  • Scope of Interconnection Service 1.3.1 The NYISO will provide Energy Resource Interconnection Service to Interconnection Customer at the Point of Interconnection.

  • GSA Benchmarked Pricing Additionally, where the NYS Net Price is based upon an approved GSA Supply Schedule:

  • Service Level In the event that League InfoSight discovers or is notified by you of the existence of Non-Scheduled Downtime, we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine the source of the problem and attempt to resolve it as quickly as possible.

  • Interconnection Customer Compensation If the CAISO requests or directs the Interconnection Customer to provide a service pursuant to Articles 9.6.3 (Payment for Reactive Power) or 13.5.1 of this LGIA, the CAISO shall compensate the Interconnection Customer in accordance with the CAISO Tariff.

  • Service Level Expectations Without limiting any other requirements of the Agreement, the Service Provider shall meet or exceed the following standards, policies, and guidelines:

  • Interconnection Customer (1) Interconnection Customer shall construct and, unless otherwise indicated, shall own, the following Interconnection Facilities: None

  • Service Levels Annex 1 to this Part A of this Call Off Schedule sets out the Service Levels the performance of which the Parties have agreed to measure. The Supplier shall monitor its performance of this Call Off Contract by reference to the relevant performance criteria for achieving the Service Levels shown in Annex 1 to this Part A of this Call Off Schedule (the Service Level Performance Criteria) and shall send the Customer a Performance Monitoring Report detailing the level of service which was achieved in accordance with the provisions of Part B (Performance Monitoring) of this Call Off Schedule. The Supplier shall, at all times, provide the Services in such a manner that the Service Levels Performance Measures are achieved. If the level of performance of the Supplier of any element of the provision by it of the Services during the Call Off Contract Period: is likely to or fails to meet any Service Level Performance Measure or is likely to cause or causes a Critical Service Failure to occur, the Supplier shall immediately notify the Customer in writing and the Customer, in its absolute discretion and without prejudice to any other of its rights howsoever arising including under Clause 12 of this Call Off Contract (Service Levels and Service Credits), may: require the Supplier to immediately take all remedial action that is reasonable to mitigate the impact on the Customer and to rectify or prevent a Service Level Failure or Critical Service Level Failure from taking place or recurring; and if the action taken under paragraph (a) above has not already prevented or remedied the Service Level Failure or Critical Service Level Failure, the Customer shall be entitled to instruct the Supplier to comply with the Rectification Plan Process; or if a Service Level Failure has occurred, deduct from the Call Off Contract Charges the applicable Service Level Credits payable by the Supplier to the Customer in accordance with the calculation formula set out in Annex 1 of this Part A of this Call Off Schedule; or if a Critical Service Level Failure has occurred, exercise its right to Compensation for Critical Service Level Failure in accordance with Clause 13 of this Call Off Contract (Critical Service Level Failure) (including subject, for the avoidance of doubt, the proviso in Clause 13.1.2 of this Call Off Contract in relation to Material Breach). Approval and implementation by the Customer of any Rectification Plan shall not relieve the Supplier of any continuing responsibility to achieve the Service Levels, or remedy any failure to do so, and no estoppels or waiver shall arise from any such Approval and/or implementation by the Customer. SERVICE CREDITS Annex 1 to this Part A of this Call Off Schedule sets out the formula used to calculate a Service Credit payable to the Customer as a result of a Service Level Failure in a given service period which, for the purpose of this Call Off Schedule, shall be a recurrent period of [one Month] during the Call Off Contract Period (the Service Period).

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.