Block’s Challenges to Typicality Sample Clauses

Block’s Challenges to Typicality. Block challenges Plaintiffs’ proof of the typicality requirement in several respects. Initially, the Court notes that Block has advanced several arguments which are not directed to any specific class certification factor, but rather, are in actuality merits arguments. The Court will discuss these arguments now. Block contended at oral argument that it did not receive license fees from its franchisee offices, as opposed to Block-owned offices. If true, this would significantly reduce the size of the Class, since the vast majority of Block’s offices in Alabama are franchisee-owned. However, whether Block received license fees from its franchisee offices is a merits issue, not a certification issue, and hence is not germane at this stage of the proceedings. Whether Plaintiffs can actually prove their claims against Block, one element of which is whether Block received license fees for its RALs during the Class Periods, is not an issue during class certification. Pursuant to Ala, Code 1975 § 6-5-641 (c), all discovery directed to the merits of Plaintiffs’ claims has been stayed. Thus, whether Block received license fees from its franchisee offices has not been fully developed, and is not ripe for adjudication in any event. Moreover, the Court notes that the deposition of Hxxxx X. Xxxxxxx (Plaintiffs’ Supplemental Notice of Filing, Exh. 9, p. 135) indicates that Block did receive license fees from its franchisee-owned offices.6 Similarly, whether Block received any license fees before 1992 is a merits issue, and has not been fully developed because merits discovery has been stayed. Block also contends that it, as opposed to its franchisees, did not participate in pooling agreements in Alabama during the Class Period. Whether or not Block profited directly from the pooling agreements is a merits question. Moreover, even if only Block’s franchisees directly participated in pooling agreements, that does not necessarily mean that Block did not ultimately profit from those pooling agreements, which could constitute a breach of the fiduciary duty alleged by Plaintiffs, Again, this is a merits question, which has not been fully developed. Block also contends that the breach of contract claim is defective because Plaintiffs’ Complaint supposedly shows that Plaintiffs have not been damaged in this respect. This contention is based upon the following: with respect to their breach of contract claim, Plaintiffs allege that had Block not received license fees from lending i...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Block’s Challenges to Typicality

  • Presentation of Potential Target Businesses The Company shall cause each of the Initial Shareholders to agree that, in order to minimize potential conflicts of interest which may arise from multiple affiliations, the Initial Shareholders will present to the Company for its consideration, prior to presentation to any other person or company, any suitable opportunity to acquire an operating business, until the earlier of the consummation by the Company of a Business Combination or the liquidation of the Company, subject to any pre-existing fiduciary obligations the Initial Shareholders might have.

  • SERVICE XXXX USE A. Controlled Affiliate recognizes the importance of a comprehensive national network of independent BCBSA licensees which are committed to strengthening the Licensed Marks and Name. The Controlled Affiliate further recognizes that its actions within its Service Area may affect the value of the Licensed Marks and Name nationwide.

  • Illegal Activities Seller shall not engage in any conduct or activity that could subject its assets to forfeiture or seizure.

  • Know-How Necessary for the Business The Intellectual Property Rights are all those necessary for the operation of the Company’s businesses as it is currently conducted or as represented, in writing, to the Purchasers to be conducted. The Company is the owner of all right, title, and interest in and to each of the Intellectual Property Rights, free and clear of all liens, security interests, charges, encumbrances, equities, and other adverse claims, and has the right to use all of the Intellectual Property Rights. To the Company’s knowledge, no employee of the Company has entered into any contract that restricts or limits in any way the scope or type of work in which the employee may be engaged or requires the employee to transfer, assign, or disclose information concerning his work to anyone other than of the Company.

  • Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Xxx 0000 No term of this Agreement is enforceable under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Xxx 0000 by a person who is not a party to this Agreement.

  • Notification of Threatened Action Each Party will immediately notify the other Party of any information it receives regarding any threatened or pending action, inspection or communication by any Regulatory Authority, which may affect the safety or efficacy claims of any Licensed Product or the continued marketing of any Licensed Product. Upon receipt of such information, the Parties will consult with each other in an effort to arrive at a mutually acceptable procedure for taking appropriate action.

  • Assistance with Valuation The Sub-Adviser will provide reasonable assistance to the Adviser and the Custodian, Administrator or similar party designated by the Adviser in assessing the fair value of securities or other instruments held in the Allocated Portion for which market quotations are not readily available or for which the Adviser or the Board has otherwise determined to fair value such portfolio holdings.

  • Data Subjects Rights The Participant may have a number of rights under the data privacy laws in the Participant’s country of residence. For example, the Participant’s rights may include the right to (i) request access or copies of personal data the Company processes, (ii) request rectification of incorrect data, (iii) request deletion of data, (iv) place restrictions on processing, (v) lodge complaints with competent authorities in the Participant’s country of residence, and/or (vi) request a list with the names and addresses of any potential recipients of the Participant’s personal data. To receive clarification regarding the Participant’s rights or to exercise his or her rights, the Participant should contact his or her local human resources representative.

  • Material Changes; Undisclosed Events, Liabilities or Developments Since the date of the latest audited financial statements included within the SEC Reports, except as set forth on Schedule 3.1(i), (i) there has been no event, occurrence or development that has had or that could reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect, (ii) the Company has not incurred any liabilities (contingent or otherwise) other than (A) trade payables and accrued expenses incurred in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice and (B) liabilities not required to be reflected in the Company’s financial statements pursuant to GAAP or disclosed in filings made with the Commission, (iii) the Company has not altered its method of accounting, (iv) the Company has not declared or made any dividend or distribution of cash or other property to its stockholders or purchased, redeemed or made any agreements to purchase or redeem any shares of its capital stock and (v) the Company has not issued any equity securities to any officer, director or Affiliate, except pursuant to existing Company stock option plans. The Company does not have pending before the Commission any request for confidential treatment of information. Except for the issuance of the Securities contemplated by this Agreement or as set forth on Schedule 3.1(i), no event, liability, fact, circumstance, occurrence or development has occurred or exists or is reasonably expected to occur or exist with respect to the Company or its Subsidiaries or their respective businesses, prospects, properties, operations, assets or financial condition that would be required to be disclosed by the Company under applicable securities laws at the time this representation is made or deemed made that has not been publicly disclosed at least 1 Trading Day prior to the date that this representation is made.

  • Non-Ministerial Matters (i) With respect to matters that in the reasonable judgment of the Administrator are non-ministerial, the Administrator shall not take any action unless within a reasonable time before the taking of such action, the Administrator shall have notified the Owner Trustee of the proposed action and the Owner Trustee shall not have withheld consent or provided an alternative direction. For the purpose of the preceding sentence, "non-ministerial matters" shall include, without limitation:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.