Common use of AUTHORIZING SIGNATURES Clause in Contracts

AUTHORIZING SIGNATURES. 7a. Project Manager Date 7b. Section Head Date EXHIBIT G Section II SPECIFIC RATING DESIGN EVALUATION EXCELLENT SATISFACTORY POOR N/A CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT EVALUATION EXCELLENT SATISFACTORY POOR N/A Plans/Specifications accuracy Drawing reflect existing conditions Plans/Specs coordination As-Built drawings Plans/Specs properly formatted Quality design Code Requirements covered Change orders due to design deficiencies are minimized Adherence to City design standards Timely responses Attitude toward Client and review bodies Attitude toward Client and review bodies Follows direction and chain of responsibility Follows direction and chain of responsibility Work product delivered on time Timeliness in notifying City of major problems COMPLIANCE WITH CONTRACT & BUDGET EXCELLENT SATISFACTORY POOR N/A Resolution of Field problems Reasonable agreement negotiation Value Engineering Analysis Adherence to fee schedule Adherence to project budget Timely responses Timeliness in notifying City of major issues Work product delivered on time

AUTHORIZING SIGNATURES. 7a. Project Manager Date 7b. Section Head Deputy Director Date EXHIBIT G (4/91) TURN OVER Consultant Performance Evaluation 1 of 2 01-18-13 Section II SPECIFIC RATING DESIGN EVALUATION PLANS / SPECIFICATION ACCURACY EXCELLENT SATISFACTORY POOR N/A CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT EVALUATION RESPONSIVENESS TO CITY STAFF EXCELLENT SATISFACTORY POOR N/A PlansPlan/Specifications accuracy Drawing reflect existing conditions Specification clear and precise Timely Responses Plans/Specs coordination As-Built drawings Coordination Attitude toward Client and review bodies Plans/Specs properly formatted Quality design Follows direction and chain of responsibility Code Requirements covered Work product delivered on time Adhered to City Standard Drawings/Specs Timeliness in notifying City of major problems Drawings reflect existing conditions Resolution of Field problems As-Built Drawings CONSISTENCY WITH BUDGET EXCELLENT SATISFACTORY POOR N/A Quality Design Reasonable Agreement negotiation Change orders Orders due to design deficiencies are minimized Adherence to City design standards Timely responses Attitude toward Client and review bodies Attitude toward Client and review bodies Follows direction and chain of responsibility Follows direction and chain of responsibility Work product delivered on time Timeliness in notifying City of major problems COMPLIANCE WITH CONTRACT & BUDGET EXCELLENT SATISFACTORY POOR N/A Resolution of Field problems Reasonable agreement negotiation Value Engineering Analysis Adherence to fee schedule Adherence to project budget Timely responses Timeliness in notifying City of major issues Work product delivered on timeValue Engineering Analysis

AUTHORIZING SIGNATURES. 7a. Project Manager Date 7b. Section Head Date EXHIBIT G Section II SPECIFIC RATING DESIGN EVALUATION EXCELLENT SATISFACTORY POOR N/A CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT EVALUATION EXCELLENT SATISFACTORY POOR N/A Plans/Specifications accuracy Drawing reflect existing conditions Plans/Specs coordination As-Built drawings Plans/Specs properly formatted Quality design Code Requirements covered Change orders due to design deficiencies are minimized Adherence to City design standards Timely responses Attitude toward Client and review bodies Attitude toward Client and review bodies Follows direction and chain of responsibility Follows direction and chain of responsibility Work product delivered on time Timeliness in notifying City of major problems COMPLIANCE WITH CONTRACT & BUDGET EXCELLENT SATISFACTORY POOR N/A Resolution of Field problems Reasonable agreement negotiation Value Engineering Analysis Adherence to fee schedule Adherence to project budget Timely responses Timeliness in notifying City of major issues Work product delivered on time

AUTHORIZING SIGNATURES. 7a. Project Manager Date 7b. Section Head Deputy Director Date (4/91) TURN OVER EXHIBIT G F3 Section II SPECIFIC RATING DESIGN EVALUATION PLANS / SPECIFICATION ACCURACY EXCELLENT SATISFACTORY POOR N/A CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT EVALUATION RESPONSIVENESS TO CITY STAFF EXCELLENT SATISFACTORY POOR N/A PlansPlan/Specifications accuracy Drawing reflect existing conditions Specification clear and precise Timely Responses Plans/Specs coordination As-Built drawings Coordination Attitude toward Client and review bodies Plans/Specs properly formatted Quality design Follows direction and chain of responsibility Code Requirements covered Work product delivered on time Adhered to City Standard Drawings/Specs Timeliness in notifying City of major problems Drawings reflect existing conditions Resolution of Field problems As-Built Drawings CONSISTENCY WITH BUDGET EXCELLENT SATISFACTORY POOR N/A Quality Design Reasonable Agreement negotiation Change orders Orders due to design deficiencies are minimized Adherence to City design standards Timely responses Attitude toward Client and review bodies Attitude toward Client and review bodies Follows direction and chain of responsibility Follows direction and chain of responsibility Work product delivered on time Timeliness in notifying City of major problems COMPLIANCE WITH CONTRACT & BUDGET EXCELLENT SATISFACTORY POOR N/A Resolution of Field problems Reasonable agreement negotiation Value Engineering Analysis Adherence to fee schedule Adherence to project budget Timely responses Timeliness in notifying City of major issues Work product delivered on timeValue Engineering Analysis