Assumptions and Risks. Any assumption or risk external to the Program that underlies the accomplishment of the Program Objective, Project Objectives and Activity outcomes and outputs. However, such assumptions and risks will not excuse any Party’s performance unless otherwise expressly agreed to in writing by the Parties.
Assumptions and Risks. The programme assumes that the beneficiary countries will maintain their efforts to ensure a high level of nuclear safety and to implement the recommendations of the June 2001 Council Report on Nuclear Safety in the Context of Enlargement. The Peer Review Status Report, established by the Council’s Atomic Questions Group and its ad-hoc formation Working Party on Nuclear Safety on 5 June 2002, found that candidate countries are clearly committed to fulfil the recommendations set out in the Council Report, both for nuclear power plants and other types of installations. The status report also noted that all candidate countries had accepted the recommendations. This programme assumes that the beneficiary countries will continue to pay sufficient attention and devote appropriate effort to implementing the supported projects also – where and when applicable – under the EDIS in a time frame reaching beyond accession. Whilst there are no identifiable risks inherent in the tasks to be fulfilled under the various projects, an overall risk to the programme is that continued nuclear safety assistance involves the danger to create dependency on this side of the beneficiary. Special regard has to be directed towards the way in which the beneficiary organisations will sustain the results of the projects. In the cases of regulatory assistance, emphasis needs to be laid on the value of transferring know-how to the recipient and avoiding the replacement of functions in the sphere of responsibility of the beneficiary organisation through activities of the contractor.
Assumptions and Risks. Any assumption or risk external to the Program that underlies the accomplishment of the Program Objective, Project Objective and Activity outcomes and outputs.
Assumptions and Risks. To produce the expected results, in line with the project specific and overall objectives, the intervention rested on a number of key assumptions identified in the Description of Action. These assumptions were constantly monitored by the project management team through internal monitoring frameworks.
Assumptions and Risks. The M&E Plan will also outline key assumptions and risks that underlie the program logic. However, such assumptions and risks will not excuse any Party’s performance unless otherwise expressly agreed to in writing by the other Party. The known assumptions and risks include: 1 As used in this Compact, the term “beneficiary” has the meaning described MCC’s Guidelines for Economic and Beneficiary Analysis.
Assumptions and Risks. To produce the expected results, in line with the project specific and overall objectives, the intervention rested on a number of key assumptions identified in the Description of Action. These assumptions were constantly monitored by the project management team through internal monitoring frameworks. Assumption 1 The Government of the Republic of Moldova continues to pursue its EU integration related wider reform agenda Assumption 2 The Government of the Republic of Moldova continues to facilitate access by the EU High Level Policy Advisers to the key decision-makers (Ministers, Deputy Ministers, Directors) within the line Ministries and State Agencies Assumption 3 The policy advice delivered by the EUHLPAM is reflected in the policies adopted by the Government of the Republic of Moldova; the legislation enacted by the Parliament and is promoted, implemented and enforced by the relevant State structures Assumptions are assessed as remaining valid at the report date.
Assumptions and Risks. The Government of Tanzania and the International Development Partners including FAO have worked together to develop, and formulate the project starting with the expressed national need for NAFORMA information and demonstration of interest of partners to support the project. The project was designed under the assumptions that: − All Development Partners remains committed to support financially and technically to the project. − GoT remains committed to creating all the necessary conditions for the implementation of the NAFORMA project and its sustainability in the long term. In particular GoT works to: o link the project to the national policy processes (nfp, PRS, sectoral policy, etc). o build legitimacy (partners and stakeholders acceptance) for NAFORMA, through wide participation during planning and implementation of the project. o create synergies between the project and other related ongoing initiatives. o ensure NAFORMA is institutionalised and be part of the annual work and budget plan of the Government during and beyond the end of the project. o engage intersectoral policy dialogue. − Government and national stakeholders can develop a common ‘frame of reference’ to legitimise NAFORMA programme − National stakeholders are engaged in the harmonization of the forest/land use classification and forest related information framework − FBD coordinates and supervises project activities. Particularly FBD works to ensure timely inputs from all partners and stakeholders, and cost-effectiveness of the project activities. − Consensus is reached on a national list of forest and tree variables, assessment approach and methods that will help generate the needed information to all users. There are many risks that the project team should be aware of and act to minimise them. Among the major risks identified, the following are put in a matrix:
Assumptions and Risks. 3.3.1 General Assumptions and Risks Use or disclosure of data on this page is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 4
Assumptions and Risks. In this year of intervention, the agreement has some intrinsic risks because it is the beginning of the implementation, the stage of understanding and when the beneficiary population is chosen. To minimize the risks, the intervention experiences of Xxxxx Chocolate were taken in 1 USAID Cacao Strategy the planning, including the most recent where in conjunction with the PTP, 329 hectares were rehabilitated in Tumaco. On the other hand, there are also security risks due to the conflict situation between illegal armed groups in the Lower Cauca area. To minimize these risks the PMA experience will be taken, a program that is currently being implemented with USAID in the same area. In the AMELP there is an analysis of all the risks of the agreement, in this space only the main risks specific to this first phase are analyzed: RISK MITIGATION
Assumptions and Risks. Details have been removed from the public document for business confidentiality and competitiveness reasons.
