Assessment of progress Sample Clauses

Assessment of progress. (1) The Monetary Council shall cause an independent review to be conducted annually to:
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Assessment of progress. The Board shall, every five years, conduct an independent review to -
Assessment of progress. 1. By 31 October 2021 and every second year thereafter, the Commission shall assess, in particular on the basis of the integrated national energy and climate progress reports, of other information reported under this Regulation, of the indicators and of European statistics and data where available: PE625.412v01-00 68/146 AG\1158794EN.docx EN
Assessment of progress. This assessment relates only to full-time students as the proportion of part-time undergraduate HEFCE-fundable students in our 2015 HESES return is 5.0% (238 students). Key measures which are regularly monitored are set out in the table below. Key indicators of our progress across the lifecycle are described in the narrative following the table. Stage of Lifecycle Measure Outreach % participants in primary and secondary schools outreach meeting at least one WP criterion Changes in aspirations of Year 6, Year 8 and Year 10 participants to progress to HE – before and after WP interventions Perceived usefulness of residential in informing HE progression decision Qualitative feedback from school staff including general comments and their assessment of whether participants have met outcomes set out in Learner Tracking of outreach participants – comparison of HE progression rates (when age- and qualification-ready) for POLAR3 Q1 and 2 participants with average young participation rates Recruitment % first degree students from state schools % first degree students in receipt of DSA % first degree students from low participation neighbourhoods (young) % first degree students from low participation neighbourhoods (mature) Number of first degree students from UK-domicile BME groups Number of males students recruited to ITT Number of BME students recruited to ITT Number of first degree care leavers Number of first degree young adult carers Retention Retention of young first degree students from low participation neighbourhoods Retention of mature first degree students from low participation neighbourhoods % first degree students leaving with no award analysed by sex % first degree students leaving with no award analysed by disability % first degree students leaving with no award analysed by ethnicity
Assessment of progress. THIS ASSESSMENT RELATES ONLY TO FULL-TIME STUDENTS AS THE PROPORTION OF PART-TIME UNDERGRADUATE HEFCE-FUNDABLE STUDENTS IN OUR 2015 HESES RETURN IS 5.8% (280 STUDENTS). KEY MEASURES WHICH ARE REGULARLY MONITORED ARE SET OUT IN THE TABLE BELOW. KEY INDICATORS OF OUR PROGRESS ACROSS THE LIFECYCLE ARE DESCRIBED IN THE NARRATIVE FOLLOWING THE TABLE. STAGE OFLIFECYCLE MEASURE OUTREACH % PARTICIPANTS IN SECONDARY SCHOOLS OUTREACH MEETING AT LEAST CHANGES IN ASPIRATIONS OF YEAR 8 AND YEAR 10 PARTICIPANTS TOPROGRESS TO HE – PERCEIVED USEFULNESS OF RESIDENTIAL IN INFORMING HE PROGRESSION QUALITATIVE FEEDBACK FROM SCHOOL STAFF INCLUDING GENERAL COMMENTS AND THEIR TRACKING OF OUTREACH PARTICIPANTS – COMPARISON OF HE PROGRESSION RATES (WHEN RECRUITMENT % FIRST DEGREE STUDENTS FROM STATE SCHOOLS % FIRST DEGREE STUDENTS IN RECEIPT OF DSA % FIRST DEGREE STUDENTS FROM LOW PARTICIPATION NEIGHBOURHOODS % FIRST DEGREE STUDENTS FROM LOW PARTICIPATION NEIGHBOURHOODS NUMBER OF FIRST DEGREE STUDENTS FROM UK-DOMICILE BME GROUPS NUMBER OF MALES STUDENTS RECRUITED TO ITT NUMBER OF BME STUDENTS RECRUITED TO ITT NUMBER OF FIRST DEGREE CARE LEAVERS NUMBER OF FIRST DEGREE YOUNG ADULT CARERS RETENTION RETENTION OF YOUNG FIRST DEGREE STUDENTS FROM LOW RETENTION OF MATURE FIRST DEGREE STUDENTS FROM LOWPARTICIPATION % FIRST DEGREE STUDENTS LEAVING WITH NO AWARD ANALYSED BY SEX % FIRST DEGREE STUDENTS LEAVING WITH NO AWARD ANALYSED BY % FIRST DEGREE STUDENTS LEAVING WITH NO AWARD ANALYSED BY DEGREE OUTCOMES % OF 1ST AND 2(I) DEGREES ANALYSED BY SEX
Assessment of progress. Assess the progress made overcall in the activity in achieving your project goal.
Assessment of progress. In furtherance of the goals stated above, OHSU, NMI, RCI and Block 39 will encourage their general contractors working on Contingent Projects in the Project Area to support the Workforce Diversity Strategy and will require such contractors to provide summary data reflecting minority and women workforce participation within the Project Area. The Parties also agree to annually assess the progress of the Workforce Diversity Strategy through review and analysis of workforce data collected from each Party’s respective contractors, trade unions and other sources. PDC, NMI, OHSU, RCI and Block 39 acknowledge that the Workforce Diversity Strategy may be modified over time based on this annual assessment, and the Parties agree to negotiate in good faith to address changes and amend this Agreement accordingly. All Parties will be bound by any material changes to the Workforce Diversity Strategy that are set forth in writing and signed by the Parties.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Assessment of progress

  • Payment of Project Activities County will reimburse Subrecipient for eligible project-related costs only. Subrecipient shall submit requests for reimbursement to County on a monthly basis beginning on August 1, 2021, and must provide adequate documentation as required by County in accordance with the OC Community Resources Contract Reimbursement Policy, as set forth in Exhibit 1, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. In addition, Subrecipient will provide a progress Grantee Performance Report (“GPR Information Form”) for the time period covered, as prescribed by County. Failure to provide any of the required documentation and reporting will cause County to withhold all or a portion of a request for reimbursement, or return the entire reimbursement package to Subrecipient, until such documentation and reporting has been received and approved by County.

  • Environmental Assessment and Mitigation Development of a transportation project must comply with applicable environmental laws. The party named in article 1, Responsible Parties, under AGREEMENT is responsible for the following:

  • Assessment and updates 12.1 Various opportunities are provided to keep you up to date with your child’s progress. You will receive two comprehensive written reports each year and arrangements will be made for at least one interview where you can discuss your child’s development with their teacher. In addition, you can always contact the School to arrange a meeting if you have any concerns or wish to receive an update on progress.

  • ASSESSMENT REPORT Within 120 days following the general election held on November 2nd 2003, the returning officer of the munici- pality shall forward, in accordance with section 659.3 of the Act respecting elections and referendums in munici- palities (R.S.Q., c. E-2.2), an assessment report to the Chief Electoral Officer and the Minister setting out relevant ways to improve the trial and addressing, in particular, the following points : — the preparations for the election (choice of the new method of voting, communications plan, etc.) ; — the conduct of the advance poll and the poll ; — the cost of using the electronic voting system : – the cost of adapting election procedures ; – non-recurrent costs likely to be amortized ; – a comparison between the actual polling costs and the estimated polling costs using the new methods of voting and the projected cost of holding the general election on November 2nd 2003 using traditional methods ; — the number and duration of incidents during which voting was stopped, if any ; — the advantages and disadvantages of using the new method of voting ; — the results obtained during the addition of the votes and the correspondence between the number of ballot paper cards issued to the deputy returning officers and the number of ballot paper cards returned used and unused ; — the examination of rejected ballot papers, if it has been completed.

  • Payment of Project Costs The Grantee agrees that it will provide for payment of its full share of Project costs and that all costs connected with the Project will be paid by the Grantee on a timely basis.

  • Assessment Center A promotional candidate may not appeal or dispute the Assessment Center or scoring of the Assessment Center to an administrative or judicial body except for fraud committed by an assessor.

  • Assessment of Performance The assignment of a teacher to a TLS position will be subject to review by the school district’s administration at least annually. The first review must be completed no later than five (5) work days before the beginning of the transfer process. The review shall include peer feedback on the effectiveness of the teacher’s performance of duty specific to the teacher’s TLS position. A teacher who completes an assignment in a TLS position may apply for assignment to a new TLS position.

  • Scope of Project i. The work to be performed under this Agreement for the Rapid City Metropolitan Transportation Planning Process will be conducted in accordance with the CY 2018 Unified Planning Work Program incorporated in this agreement by reference as Attachment D, and the 2018 Unified Planning Work Program Amendment 2018-01, incorporated in and attached to this agreement as Attachment F.

  • OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET (OMB) AUDIT REQUIREMENTS The parties shall comply with the requirements of the Single Audit Act of 1984, P.L. 98-502, ensuring that the single audit report includes the coverage stipulated in 2 CFR 200.

  • Risk Assessments a. Risk Assessment - Transfer Agent shall, at least annually, perform risk assessments that are designed to identify material threats (both internal and external) against Fund Data, the likelihood of those threats occurring and the impact of those threats upon the Transfer Agent organization to evaluate and analyze the appropriate level of information security safeguards (“Risk Assessments”).

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.