Approach and Methodology. ARS will study experimental culture conditions for the ARS-PICM-19 cell line, its derivative cell lines, or other pig epiblast-derived liver cell lines (as described under ARS patent #5,532,156, “Hepatocyte Cell Line Derived from the Epiblast of Pig Blastocysts”) so as to optimize their hepatocyte functions for use as an in-vitro liver model, for their use in an artificial liver device, and for their use in the in-vitro assay of metabolic, toxic, or carcinogenic responses. Specific project objectives are the following:
Approach and Methodology. Provide a description of how the work will be performed and provide the proposed project schedule. Include any additional information or description of unique resources that are planned to be used to produce the deliverables. Include any proprietary technologies, methods or approaches that will be used on this project to improve quality or efficiency. If the proposal is for an IDIQ contract, the consultant should review the scope of services in Attachment A to the advertisement to obtain a general understanding of what a typical task order would entail. Based upon that understanding, the consultant should provide a sample schedule that identifies the major milestones, deliverables, tasks, etc., to demonstrate sufficient understanding of a typical task order. The duration of the task order is not required. This section shall be limited to four pages. If more than four pages are included, all pages after the fourth page will not be evaluated. If the consultant has information it believes is proprietary, label it accordingly. All South’s proposed Approach and Methodology to the CE&I of for Grafton Drive Pavement Rehabilitation is summarized in the graphic below, and detailed more extensively in this Section. Assumed Complete: Project Design and Bidding CE&I Task 1: Internal Review with DOTD CE&I Task 2: Pre-Construction Activities CE&I Task 3: Construction Activities CE&I Task 4: Construction Completion CE&I Task 5: Post-Constr. Acitivities CE&I Task 1: Internal Review with DOTD All South’s plan begins with an Internal Review with DOTD. This first step is essential toward ensuring DOTD receives the outcome they desire. This Task is intended to establish confirm project goals and objectives and set project expectations. All South will request an advanced copy of the project plans and specifications from the DOTD project engineer and will take this opportunity to initially familiarize ourselves with the project particulars prior to meeting with DOTD. All South will conduct a plan-in-hand walk-through prior to meeting. All South will prepare a list of questions and observations based on this review and will use this list as draft topics for discussion during an initial meeting with DOTD. All South intends to finalize project goals and objectives during this meeting. Initial goals established during design may need to be refined prior to construction start. Project expectations will be established related to performance, reporting, communication, chain-of-command...
Approach and Methodology. The Tender Committee will in particular consider the following: Is the proposed approach and methodology robust and adequate to meet the objectives of the assignment? Is the description clear and concise and is the description tailored specifically to the assignments? Does the Tenderer show understanding for the need to engage TRA in the solutions and do the Tenderer propose adequate methods to ensure the engagement of TRA? Does the approach and methodology reflect command of the subject matter, both in terms of knowledge and understanding of the current context? Further more, when relevant, the evaluation will consider whether potential challenges or special issues have been identified, and whether the solutions for overcoming these are satisfactory Technical Cases The Tender Committee will in particular consider the following: Does the description show that the Tenderer proposes technically adequate methods when identifying the challenges stipulated in the cases? Does the description show, that the Tenderer is able to identify the challenges and propose adequate and realistic solutions to the challenges? Does the description show that the Tenderer understands and carefully consider the maturity of TRA? Does the description show, that the Tenderer is able to balance the effort required by TRA and the need for progress in the projects? Organization: The Tender Committee will in particular consider the following: The proposed organization (for the solution of the technical cases) is efficient with clear lines of responsibility and communication both internally (at the Tenderer itself) and in relation to the recipient The completed Schedule 2.2 will be considered when evaluating the proposed Organization.
Approach and Methodology. ARS will study culture conditions for the ARS-PICM-19 cell line, its derivative cell lines, or other pig epiblast-derived liver cell lines (as described under ARS patent #5,532,156, “Hepatocyte Cell Line Derived from the Epiblast of Pig Blastocysts”) so as to optimize their hepatocyte functions for use as an in vitro liver model, for their use in a flow-through bioreactor (“HepaLife bioreactor”), a multicompartment flow-through hollow-fiber bioreactor currently manufactured by Stem Cell Systems GmbH, Germany, or any other bioreactor design designated by HepaLife Biosystems, Inc., and for their use in the in vitro assay of metabolic or toxic responses.
Approach and Methodology. Provide a detailed description of your approach and methodology to provide the TMS as described in Section 2.0 – Scope of Services. Ensure your responses include a project plan with timelines, a detailed explanation for accomplishing the specific work and deliverables. The response shall include information that will provide DHS with a clear understanding that your agency has the ability to meet or exceed the services requested in this WOS, at a minimum, describe how your agency will provide the following:
Approach and Methodology. (Be sure to cover the activities of both ARS and COOPERATOR.)
Approach and Methodology. The following is a summary of the approach and methodology to be applied:
Approach and Methodology. One dominating part of the evaluation approach has been to get the understanding, comments, and proposals directly from the beneficiaries, from central to local level including the children and youth themselves. This is because without this ‘stakeholder participation’ it would not be possible to analyze the usefulness of the project in the short and long term. The bulk of information collected relied on meetings, interviews, in-depth interviews and group discussions with a great number of representatives, from GOV officials in Hanoi to children with disabilities in Ninh Xxxx and Xxxxx Xxx. Briefings were held with representatives of CRS and WCDO. The team visited 4 out of 6 project districts in Ninh Xxxx and Xxxxx Xxx: Xxx Xxxx and Yen Mo in Ninh Xxxx and Xxxx Xxx and Xxx Xxxxx in Xxxxx Xxx. However, the main time and emphasis were devoted to Xxx Xxxx and Xxxx Xxx only.
Approach and Methodology. The general approach and methodology are outlined in the TOR. This chapter is a further elaboration, reflecting the thoughts and way of work of the consultants.
Approach and Methodology. The Offeror shall:
