Alternative Evaluator Sample Clauses

Alternative Evaluator. On request, teachers shall be assigned an alternative evaluator. Requests must be submitted in writing by October 1st.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Alternative Evaluator. Request for an alternative evaluator must be submitted in writing by October 5, along with the rationale for the request, to the building principal. Should the request be denied, the teacher may request a meeting with Human Resources and may be accompanied by an Association representative to discuss concerns and any possible solutions.
Alternative Evaluator. A teacher may submit, by October 1st, a written request to the Superintendent, to be assigned an alternative evaluator. If the request is denied, the Superintendent shall put the reason(s) for such denial in writing within ten (10) days of the request.
Alternative Evaluator. On request, teachers may be assigned an alternative evaluator. Requests must be submitted to the Superintendent in writing by September 15th.
Alternative Evaluator. On request, teachers shall be assigned an alternative evaluator. Requests must be submitted in writing by October 30th. Email from the employee’s district network account is considered a written request.
Alternative Evaluator. Upon request a certificated employee may be assigned an alternative evaluator. Requests must be submitted in writing by October 1st.
Alternative Evaluator. On request, a teacher may be assigned an alternative evaluator. Such request must be made in writing prior to the first formal observation. Should an evaluator determine that a certificated employee on a focused evaluation should be moved to a comprehensive evaluation for that school year, the certificated employee must be informed of this decision in writing at any time on or before November 1. Should a certificated teacher request a transfer from a focused evaluation to a comprehensive evaluation, that request must also be made prior to November 1.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Alternative Evaluator. In the event an employee receives an evaluation the he/she considered to be negative, that employee may request and shall be granted a meeting with the evaluator’s supervisor and an Association member if the employee so chooses. At the meeting, the administrator shall determine if there is reasonable basis for the employee to be granted a new evaluation. In the event the administrator makes such a finding for the employee the employees shall be granted a new evaluation to be conducted by a district administrator other than the employee’s original evaluator.
Alternative Evaluator. Any certificated employee who receives a negative evaluation shall, upon request, be entitled to at least one (1) additional observation, conference and written evaluation as prescribed above. At the employee’s request, the additional observation and subsequent evaluation shall be performed by a different administrator as assigned by the Human Resources Department in consultation with UTR.

Related to Alternative Evaluator

  • Summative Evaluation An evaluation used to arrive at a rating on each standard, an overall rating, and as a basis to make personnel decisions. The summative evaluation includes the Evaluator’s judgments of the Educator’s performance against Performance Standards and the Educator’s attainment of goals set forth in the Educator’s Plan.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and xxxx them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. No response TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Yes - No Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • Comprehensive Evaluation The Comprehensive evaluation is a growth-oriented, teacher/evaluator collaborative process that requires teachers to be evaluated on the eight (8) state criteria. A teacher must complete a Comprehensive evaluation once every four (4) years. Subsequent years they will be evaluated on a Focused evaluation.

  • Self-Evaluation Each regular faculty member shall provide a self-evaluation. It shall address, among other items, the faculty member's fulfillment of professional responsibilities as referenced in Section 18.2.3 and an assessment of his or her own performance. The faculty member will share the self-evaluation with the Faculty Evaluation Committee and the first-level manager or designee. The self-evaluation will become part of the evaluation report.

  • TEACHER EVALUATION A. All monitoring or observation of the work performance of a teacher shall be conducted openly and with full knowledge of the teacher.

  • Focused Evaluation The Focused Evaluation is used when a teacher is not evaluated using the Comprehensive Evaluation process, and will include evaluation of one of the eight state criteria (student growth impact required). If a non-provisional teacher has scored at Proficient or higher the previous year, they may be moved to Focused Evaluation. The teacher may remain on the Focused Evaluation for five (5) years before returning to the Comprehensive Evaluation. The teacher or the evaluator can initiate a move from the Focused to the Comprehensive Evaluation. A decision to move a teacher from a Focused to a Comprehensive Evaluation must occur by December 15.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.