After the Evaluation Sample Clauses

After the Evaluation. 16.5.1 The Supervisor shall recommend the retention or termination from the position of the probationary employee by a check mark in the appropriate box. (This section is for probationary employees only).
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
After the Evaluation. None of the Parties will seek to instruct the NEvaluator or PIcArbs (or any employee or representative of PIcArbs) as a consultant or arbitrator in any litigation or arbitration in relation to the Dispute and the NEvaluator and PIcArbs will not act voluntarily in any such capacity without the written agreement of all the Parties. ______________________________ SCHEDULE OF NEvaluator’s & PIcArbs’ fees Effective from November 2018. These rates are agreed between the Parties as the recoverable rates 4 hours = a half day; 8 hours = a full day PARTIES AGREED RECOVERABLE HOURLY RATES/FEES: NE Type Reading and researching Providing Evaluation NEvaluator’s Fees QC £ + vat Junior £ + vat Written Evaluation Half day Half day 3,600 2,400 1 day 1 day 7,200 4,800 more Please discuss this with us Meeting Evaluation Half day Half day 3,600 2,400 1 day 1day 7,200 4,800 Meeting rooms The Parties arrange these and pay the cost Travel of NEvaluator To be agreed with the NEvaluator’s clerks PIcArbs Fees: Appointment and e-filing fee: £500 + VAT Parties request to remove NEvaluator fee: £300 + VAT PIcArbs NEvaluators’ Fees: Additional hourly work: QC: £450 ph; Junior: £300 ph; Cancellation fees: Case settled &/or meeting cancelled over 2 months b4: £0 per diary day “ meeting cancelled 22 dys – 2 months b4: 25% “ meeting cancelled 21 - 15 days b4: 35% “ meeting cancelled 14 - 8 days b4: 50% “ meeting cancelled 7 days or less b4: 100% __________________________________________ Guidance Notes on this NE Agreement Please download this standard form agreement from xxx.xxxxxxx.xx.xx, then both parties sign it. Then both Parties must register at xxxx://xxxxxxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx. Then the Claimant starts the new case e-file from his/her home page and uploads the signed NE Agreement. PIcArbs will appoint a Neutral Evaluator who will sign the Agreement and upload it onto the e-file. The Evaluator will then communicate with the Parties through the e-filing system. Guidance on Neutral Evaluation There are 3 forms of ADR: Mediation, Neutral Evaluation and Arbitration. To use any form the Parties need to agree to choose that way forwards for resolving their dispute. Under a Mediation agreement a meeting is arranged between the parties and the independent mediator. With the mediator’s neutral facilitation the parties seek to reach agreement. The mediator does not evaluate the issues and does not need to be an expert in the field of law of the dispute. Under a Neutral Evaluation agreemen...
Sample 1
After the Evaluation. Make a note of any candidates who fail the evaluation. • Complete and return all Skills Evaluation Packages, the Evaluation Sign-in sheet, and the Evaluator Agreement (this document) to the Government of Alberta. • DO NOT inform the testing host or the candidate(s) of their results. The Government of Alberta will deliver the results. DECLARATION Legal name only — NO nicknames I have complied with all of the evaluation procedures listed in this agreement and confirm that I have read these procedures before the start of the evaluation. I confirm that I have ensured the safety of all candidates and have treated all candidates fairly and with respect in accordance with the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Alberta Human Rights Act. I understand that all evaluations and assessment material are subject to audit by Alberta Municipal Affairs and failure to follow these procedures may result in suspension of privileges as an evaluator for the Government of Alberta. Signature: Date: The evaluator must read the following rules to the candidate(s) BEFORE beginning the evaluation. Evaluation Rules Infractions of the evaluation rules will not be tolerated. If you violate these rules, you will be required to leave the evaluation area and will not be allowed to complete the evaluation. • The grading system is Pass or Fail. • You must pass all skills listed on the Skills Sheets to pass the evaluation. • All personal electronic data storage devices are prohibited in the evaluation area. These include, but are not limited to, USB keys, cell phones, electronic diaries, recording or filming devices, cameras and fitness devices. • Other prohibited items in the examination area include: o computers, tablets and iPads o books, notebooks, post-its and reference material o watches, smart watches and fitness trackers o computer bags, purses, briefcases, backpacks o personal belongings including coats, gloves, hats or other articles of clothing • You will not be able to leave the evaluation area once the evaluation has started. If you do, you will not be allowed to continue. • You must not communicate with others while you are being evaluated, except where it is part of the task under evaluation. You must not coach other candidates while they are being evaluated. • No candidate is allowed to watch or listen to the evaluations of other candidates, unless completing a team or partner task. • Do not ask the evaluator to coach you. • If you cannot complete the skill without...
Sample 1

Related to After the Evaluation

  • Re-evaluation a) When a job has moved to a higher group as a result of re-evaluation, the resulting rate shall be retroactive from the date that Management or the employee has applied to the Plant Job Review Committee for re-evaluation.

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • Self-Evaluation Each regular faculty member shall provide a self-evaluation. It shall address, among other items, the faculty member's fulfillment of professional responsibilities as referenced in Section 18.2.3 and an assessment of his or her own performance. The faculty member will share the self-evaluation with the Faculty Evaluation Committee and the first-level manager or designee. The self-evaluation will become part of the evaluation report.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and xxxx them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. No response TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Yes - No Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • MANAGEMENT OF EVALUATION OUTCOMES 12.1 The evaluation of the Employee’s performance will form the basis for rewarding outstanding performance or correcting unacceptable performance.

  • Summative Evaluation An evaluation used to arrive at a rating on each standard, an overall rating, and as a basis to make personnel decisions. The summative evaluation includes the Evaluator’s judgments of the Educator’s performance against Performance Standards and the Educator’s attainment of goals set forth in the Educator’s Plan.

  • Written Evaluation The Superintendent in consultation with the Board shall review and assess the Administrator’s performance on or before February 1 of each year. The Administrator shall be formally evaluated in writing annually by the Superintendent on or before February 1 of each year. The evaluation shall include a description of the Administrator’s duties and responsibilities and the standards to which the Administrator is to perform. It shall consider the Administrator’s specific duties, responsibilities, management and competence as an Administrator; specify the Administrator’s strengths and weaknesses with supporting reasons; align with research based standards established by the Illinois State Board of Education and use data and indicators on student growth as a significant factor in rating performance. The evaluation shall also consist of a review of the Administrator’s progress toward meeting established professional, student performance and academic goals set forth in Appendix A and a review of the Administrator’s leadership and management performance relative to his current assignment. The written evaluation shall be signed by both the Superintendent and the Administrator. The Administrator may respond to the evaluation in writing and such response shall be attached to and included in the Administrator’s personnel file.

  • PROGRESS EVALUATION Engineer shall, from time to time during the progress of the Engineering Services, confer with County at County’s election. Engineer shall prepare and present such information as may be pertinent and necessary, or as may be reasonably requested by County, in order for County to evaluate features of the Engineering Services. At the request of County or Engineer, conferences shall be provided at Engineer's office, the offices of County, or at other locations designated by County. When requested by County, such conferences shall also include evaluation of the Engineering Services. County may, from time to time, require Engineer to appear and provide information to the Xxxxxxxxxx County Commissioners Court. Should County determine that the progress in Engineering Services does not satisfy an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, then County shall review same with Engineer to determine corrective action required. Engineer shall promptly advise County in writing of events which have or may have a significant impact upon the progress of the Engineering Services, including but not limited to the following:

  • Focused Evaluation The Focused Evaluation is used when a teacher is not evaluated using the Comprehensive Evaluation process, and will include evaluation of one of the eight state criteria (student growth impact required). If a non-provisional teacher has scored at Proficient or higher the previous year, they may be moved to Focused Evaluation. The teacher may remain on the Focused Evaluation for five (5) years before returning to the Comprehensive Evaluation. The teacher or the evaluator can initiate a move from the Focused to the Comprehensive Evaluation. A decision to move a teacher from a Focused to a Comprehensive Evaluation must occur by December 15.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.